New JT powering selfrunning E-light

[kooler]

hey,
i found one of these on a eletronic parts website somewere

http://www.frontgate.com/jump.jsp?itemID=13363&itemType=PRODUCT&iProductID=13363&path=1%2C2%2C113%2C578

[resonanceman]

I hope that there is a lesson here,

Lets see if I can sum it  up.

Gadget tried to make  alot of money  with some very  good ideas .

He did makre some money  but is now wondering  if he  has compromised   the safety of himself  and his daughter .,


ANY device that  proves OU is  possable  puts   the  many billions of dollars  of energy related  profits at risk.

Does anyone   think  that  all the people making all this money  will just roll  over  and play dead  when there profits are threatened?

If  the company  that is  going to manufacture  the eternity light now  keeps  a low profile , they probably  will make it to market .
Once they  get to market  I  would give them a month at the most .
If  the  eternity light  is seen as a risk to current energy dogma  there  will  be people studying  the situation, people and companys involved
Once  a weakness is found  that weakness  will  be exploited .
Chances are good that  the company  trying to manufacture the lights  will be stopped  by something  as simple  as a bigshot making a phone call and asking for a favor .
We  will never know  how  the company is stopped ......... but  just watch .........I am sure that they  will be stopped.

ANy one  person or one company  can be stopped.
Applying  for a patant  and  making a bunch  of money  with  a OU energy device is  almost  like  painting  a big bullseye  on your back.

OU  has to be  a grass roots movement
It has to grow relativerly slowly  all around the world
We can not afford to leave any country  out .
We can not   afford to get greedy because  the greedy  become targets of  the super  greedy,

I truly  hope that Gadget  wins the OU prize

Winning  thre prize should  open alot of peoples eyes  and get them building.
Once enough people are building  we will be unstoppable


gary

[Pirate88179]

Gary:

I agree with you 100%!  Great post.

Bill

[tinu]

I hope that there is a lesson here,

Lets see if I can sum it  up.

Gadget tried to make  alot of money  with some very  good ideas .

He did makre some money  but is now wondering  if he  has compromised   the safety of himself  and his daughter .,


ANY device that  proves OU is  possable  puts   the  many billions of dollars  of energy related  profits at risk.

Does anyone   think  that  all the people making all this money  will just roll  over  and play dead  when there profits are threatened?

If  the company  that is  going to manufacture  the eternity light now  keeps  a low profile , they probably  will make it to market .
Once they  get to market  I  would give them a month at the most .
If  the  eternity light  is seen as a risk to current energy dogma  there  will  be people studying  the situation, people and companys involved
Once  a weakness is found  that weakness  will  be exploited .
Chances are good that  the company  trying to manufacture the lights  will be stopped  by something  as simple  as a bigshot making a phone call and asking for a favor .
We  will never know  how  the company is stopped ......... but  just watch .........I am sure that they  will be stopped.

ANy one  person or one company  can be stopped.
Applying  for a patant  and  making a bunch  of money  with  a OU energy device is  almost  like  painting  a big bullseye  on your back.

OU  has to be  a grass roots movement
It has to grow relativerly slowly  all around the world
We can not afford to leave any country  out .
We can not   afford to get greedy because  the greedy  become targets of  the super  greedy,

I truly  hope that Gadget  wins the OU prize

Winning  thre prize should  open alot of peoples eyes  and get them building.
Once enough people are building  we will be unstoppable


gary

Well, I fully agree with your post with one remark: it would hold true if the original device was OU.
But for the case here, I’d sum it up “slightly” different:

1. The device is not OU. (If it was OU it would run on caps, remember? OU would then have been long proved beyond any doubts.)
2. The inventor knows his device is not OU but he plays naively. (If he does not know it, he is dumb, which is clearly not the case. The other only way is the environment is so RF polluted a LED with a piece of wire will light up â€" but that case, which I consider very improbable, is also on the burden of the inventor to investigate. Nevertheless, excuses, invoke of MIBs and fear and ultimately withdraw from the path is part of the game at this stage.)
3. A whole forum was exploited and manipulated for profits. (But if that’s ok with Stefan so be it.)
4. Don’t believe everything you read and see, especially on the internet. Ask for proofs. Indirect proofs may work too (certification from independent testers or even friends or witnesses; running from caps; in-out measurements conducted on a “black-box“ approach etc. etc. Point is there are countless ways of providing proofs and to divulge absolutely nothing!)
5. When a man has to make for a living, some things are excusable while others are not…

Cheers,
Tinu

[Groundloop]

@Tinu,

1. There is no way to categorically state that his circuit setup is OU or not without
    testing the circuit. I plan to test the circuit setup.

2. The inventor got fear and was driven away by the share volume of shit thrown at him
    by people on this forum.

3. It is pure speculation to say that a whole forum was exploited and manipulated for
    profits.

4. Agree.

5. Again, I agree, but what does this have to do with the said inventor?

Groundloop.