Experiments designing a BLDC Acyclical Generator

[leeanderthal]

Hi All,
I hope I am not in the wrong place with this topic.  I am trying to build an acyclical machine and a homopolar generator is acyclical so, here we go.

I have read lots of conflicting info regarding axially rotated magnets and their fields.  Does the field rotate with the magnet or not?  If not, then designing my machine would be a piece of cake.  This was my first experiment (see attachment). There was no current produced,  I guess the field remains stationary  when the magnets rotate.  Then I wondered, would the effect of the Lorentz force cause the field to rotate.  If it did, then I could have a motionless generator or maybe a DC transformer.  So, I made a second coil and placed it along side of the original coil.  While leaving the cylindrical magnet arrays stationary, I applied a current to the original coil and tried to detect a current in the new coil which would indicate that the EMF of the first coil was causing the field to rotate. No such luck.
I now conclude that axially rotated magnets won't work. In experiment #2 I reconfigured the magnets and got a current.  Of course, it was pulsing , but it was juice
In the third experiment I used a helical configuration in an effort to overcome the pulsing and get constant DC.  The helixes were arranged so that N and S were spiraled in opposite directions. (See Pic) I also used four cylindrical magnet arrays and 2 coils to eliminate as much dead wire as possible.  Now both halves of the coil were in the presence of the rotating field and since two coils were used both ends of the magnet arrays were used as well. The helical design also eliminated nearly all of the cogging. This was successful.  It produced a fairly smooth DC.  As the RPM's approached 1000 the pulsing was undectectable with my analog equipment.
With experimentation and more precise construction, this may turn out to be something.  The gap between the cylinders was pretty large (7/16").  The magnets were small.  Could have used more magnets/helixes.  It is very labor intensive and expensive to build.
I would appreciate some input from some of you brainiacs. 

[leeanderthal]

Here's a pic that did't make it.

[leeanderthal]

Here's a better one.

[Magluvin]

This is different than I have ever seen indeed. From what is said, you are having a change of field from one place to the next as it goes. Depalma said that the fields in place all around us, is the flux that cuts the copper, so if the copper is stationary, the field would have to be altering due to magnet pole position change in space as compared to the stationary position of the copper(or conductor of any kind). This is why the claims that the copper needs to be the mover. I have thought of this, that maybe a couple of toroid magnets , opposite poles facing, that have alterenating levels of strength could be used to overcome the said paradox of the copper being stationary. Or even alternating magnets causing a very good AC component. Not sure yet. Just thoughts at this point

Magluvin

[leeanderthal]

Thanks Magluvin for the comments.
To all the lurkers:
This is amazing to me.  For many years the HPG has been known to have many drawbacks. Namely, brushes, high current/low voltage, large eddy currents.  I offer a design which I believe  has the possibility to overcome all of these.  Am I delusional?  If you think so, please tell me.  I can take it. If not then you need to get on board and establish as much prior art as possible before it's to late. 
As a bonus, I also believe it may be possible that if this configuration (or any other for that matter) could be designed with a uniform field Lenz's law could be overcome. I know that is debatable.  Let's stay away from that for now.