Pulsed DC Transformer with Embedded Magnets

[quarktoo]

XS
Yours is" MAKE BELIEVE" it runs on Fairy dust [easy.... Buzz].

This one is real ,it runs on Nickles and secret sause!!

http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=10230.msg271240#new

Chet

Make believe? Now shipping.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nyNc-97ZFhM&feature=related

[ramset]

Sorry for my ignorance XS NRG
Thanks Q2
Chet

[quarktoo]

Sorry for my ignorance XS NRG
Thanks Q2
Chet

No apology needed Chet. Ignorance is what this thread is all about. It is not only encouraged, it is demanded.

I went over to POINT99's place and started reading Larry's new thread and noticed two things:

1. Larry didn't get past his first post before he got nailed by .99 for making an OU claim without meeting the undefined standard as Rosemary pointed out. Larry's post was not just deleted, it was modified by .99. Haven't seen that kind of nazism since oupower and before that Hitler himself.

2. The second thing I noticed was that PhysicsProfesser can't seem to form his next thought without someone else telling him what to do.

Just because someone was a physics professor doesn't mean they know anything about electronics. That will be a crack in the dam people use to discredit Larry if people start looking behind the wizards curtain and asking hard questions.

A calorimeter would be the only way to ultimately test that device and the output is so low, even that will be in question or impossible.

If an electronic device is OU, it should be able to run itself. If it can't, then it fails the law of economics and is rather pointless.

The only thing PhysicsProfesser is going to get out of all this is a bloody nose from both sides of the argument. Everything to lose and nothing to gain. He should have stuck around and learned to take the word "phenomenon" out of the definition of electricity and learned an experiment that would put classic EM in defense mode until they figure out a way to put vacuum energy into the equations. That would have had value to him and you are not going to learn that from someone that was classically trained in electronics. It is like a religion with them - behold the power of programming.

e·lec·tric·i·ty  (-lk-trs-t, lk-)
1.
a. The physical phenomena arising from the behavior of electrons and protons that is caused by the attraction of particles with opposite charges and the repulsion of particles with the same charge.
b. The physical science of such phenomena.
2. Electric current used or regarded as a source of power.
3. Intense, contagious emotional excitement.


"attraction of particles with opposite charges and the repulsion of particles with the same charge."

Gee... Sure does sound like the pulling apart and slamming back together of some mass or that cavitation subject I have been preaching for years now. Explains the speed amplification of voltage to the speed of light which just happens to correlate to the force of the vacuum field. When we produce electricity we call it AB effect and it has been peer reviewed, just not accepted.

When people understand that then they will be able to logically create from that simple understanding based in knowledge. Belief and phenomena are the fog that blind them presently.

[poynt99]

Lawrence's post was only edited to remove text of his unsubstantiated claims. None of his posts were deleted.

All claims of OU should be properly supported with credible evidence before being posted. In a nutshell, that's the "standard".

.99

[quarktoo]

Lawrence's post was only edited to remove text of his unsubstantiated claims. None of his posts were deleted.

All claims of OU should be properly supported with credible evidence before being posted. In a nutshell, that's the "standard".

.99

.99 if you were not so blinded by your religion you would have read that I stated "Larry's post was not just deleted, it was modified by .99. "

I wrote the line exactly what happened - You deleted parts and modified it.

Next time you quote me, use the quote button since you seem to have a bad habit of misquoting me and then trying to use that as a place to create a false argument. That is what you did at OUR and then used that to ban me rather than man up. That is not "free energy" pal.

Oh and before you jump on the conspiracy theory band wagon, I was editing a typo and adding to the last line in that post hence the edit. What I didn't change is what you just misquoted. Once again... I don't expect you to apologize for your error this time any more than you did over he MileHigh spring misquote or any of the others.

Now go back to your temple O belief and praise the almighty books you use to form your house of cards. If you ever feel like pulling your head out of your arse, have a look at this Nassim Haramein work:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Y5bXdx5UrE&feature=player_embedded

I'll attach his paper "The Schwartzchild Proton" to this post. Notice how he can go from the size of the universe down the the measured size of a magnetic field and be within 2.25 times of accuracy? Once he stops accepting the "belief" of what a magnetic field is I suspect you can cut that error factor exactly in half or .125

"The vacuum is feeding all atoms" - Nassim Haramein