Electrical igniter for gas engines A keystone to understanding by Magluvin

[Tito L. Oracion]

hahahahhahahha     

ok! within this month i 'll promise and take note of it SERIOUSLY.

I WILL GIVE TO ALL OF YOU FOR THE WORLD ONE OF MY PREVIOUS FREE ENERGY DESIGN OK?

IS THAT OK TO ALL OF YOU?

a combination of battery caps and coil, a very very simple what i always say.

FOR THE BENEFIT OF MANKIND!

[ramset]

AS long as you keep smiling and stick around buddy!

Chet

[baroutologos]

Hello here,

now i saw this new thread. You told and done it mag!

So, it all boils down with BEMF? Pulsing a coil of high inductunce and capturing the kick-back in low inductunce or just the opposite confused 
What about resonance? How this is connected with kapanadze technology?

@Tito,

The basic http://www.overunity.com/index.php?topic=5975.15 diagram is the proof of concept? I got it well?

one interesting thing i read in the 2008 thread and give me a laughter is the circuit http://books.google.com/books?id=0RmkmrFxHM0C&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&q=&f=false

Actually i have made it a background picture in one of my folders and it has been suggested by King, extracted from an electrostatic patent. I have build it atcually to see if my Bedini SSG outputs more with that circuit, but no such luck.
By the way this circuit works well.

[baroutologos]

2 words for ya Teets,  Coaxial Cable

magluvin  keep it coming   =]

Why coaxial cable mags? It seems ideal for biffilar settings...

[delboy]

Standard ignition coil just overload the source! Tesla's design does not do that! You must understand this, it is very important.
Look at circuit. Controler have 2 things to do, make and break contact! That is why it should be as close to ideal switch as possible.
On make it discharges condenser to primary and you have HV oscillation in secondary and charges input inductivity (two currents flow) but here is the point „it doesn't have to go to max source current to give HV like in standard ignition coil“.
On break it discharges input inductivity and charges condenser.
Here is example.
When you calculate if we have switch running 100Hz and input inductivity have inductanse L=0,5H and resistance R=5 Ohms than it gives as standard RL circuit connected to battery. For that frequency it gives us Q=62. That means max voltage on capacitor will be 12*62=744 volts if baterry is 12V and resonance is maintained.
If switch is running 100Hz that means period ON is 5ms and also perion OFF is 5ms. For 5ms ON it gives that current will rise
i=(E/R)*(1-exp(-R*t/L)) where t=5ms
when we calculate it gives only 0,117 A
If we speed up controller for say now we have 200Hz swiching that gives more bigger Q=125 , more bigger voltage Uc=1500 and less current from source.
i=(E/R)*(1-exp(-R*t/L)) where t=2,5ms
when we calculate it gives only 0,059A
Now compare that current to todays standard ignition coil. That is why they did not understand what for is input inductivity, and todays design is that source is directly connected to primary (low resistance) and high peak of current flow from source.
Current in input inductivity is not step rising, as soon as controller break it is disharged in capacitor in form of HV, and process starts again.
We only have to choose proper input inductivity and primary capacity so that when controller runs resonance is achieved. That is beauty of Tesla design!
NO OVERLOAD ON SOURCE AND YET YOU HAVE HV/HF.