This device is the real self-running overunity?

[scotty1]

OOPS, sorry about that.
Here is the link for my second clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z-OLNMG3UTE
And here is a clip I did ages ago showing 2 speaker magnets in attraction.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IlUY3snoWI8
I can tell you all that even if one speaker A is spun at 90deg to the stationary one....the stationary magnet will not move on its own axis even though it has 2 poles rotating above it.

Don't forget that if a speaker type magnet could rotate on its axis then we could just spin the magnet over a copper disc and make power....but we all know it doesn't work BECAUSE THE FIELD WON'T ROTATE!

Cheers.
Scotty.
"The metal is not the real magnet....the real magnet is the substance that is circulating in the metal" Ed. L 

[Airstriker]

Here is the second clip.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdesjiXt_Ig
Scotty.

It's the same as the first one. And it's not a good video at all. First off all You have no relative motion between a magnet and a disk. Secondly, You cannot compare an aluminium disk to the coil. It acts completely different. Hope you know why.

[Airstriker]

How on Earth can a magnet like a speaker magnet rotate on its own axis and ALSO GIVE THE MAIN ROTOR A KICK to assist its motion.

That's the problem. You've just erased the main point of this machine from your mind ! Without it you have nothing. And that's what my video is about:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=te8Anp8xeyw

Sorry for poor quality.

[gauschor]

Hi all, I have asked the inventor some questions and mentioned the discussion going on here in this thread. Although some questions are not answered as detailed as I hoped, I am thankful for every hint received  (bold text is from inventor)


first of all, thank you for a very polite civilized respounce.  Anything you what to know I'll tell you if you just ask nicely.

1) Is your pickup/induction coil using a ferrit core, or  is it only an aircoil without any core at all?
Air coils
         
2) Some users say that the disc shaped magnet can neither  evade Lenz Law, nor rotate away from the copper coil if the magnet is  polarized heads/tail - yet you claim it does so in your video. They  posted a video in here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WdesjiXt_Ig  showing that a disc shaped magnet will not rotate/evade at all. This  makes it difficult to understand because it is contrary. Can you explain  the mechanism in your device regarding this issue?
I saw the videos and cannot believe anyone could do such a bad  job. It is all wrong so, it is of no use at all. I am not working for  him or anyone else. If he wants to bet me some money, I'll prove him wrong.

3) What is it exactly that produces the excess energy?
There is nothing making excess energy. Energy cannot be created  OR destroyed but, it can be moved around. I have made an electric  generator (and this is very important to me) not an overunity machine.  The term is not a real word but, slang and I have nothing to do with  that.

4) On your very first device (the clip you uploaded 1 year  ago) you used plexiglass discs instead of wooden aeroplane wings. From  what you have spoken in your later videos these wings are very necessary  to stabilize the rotor. Still you used the plexiglass discs before  which had no wing-shapes. What is the difference between these 2  versions?
The wing is very important
         
5) Do the wings have another function as well, aside from  stabilizing the rotor?
Yes
         
6) Do you have any data or measurements gathered with  multimeters? Unfortunately it is difficult to determine the values on  the multimeter on clip #2.
My multimeter is burnt out and I have no way to get another at  this time. Especially, just to prove something I already know.
         
7) Can you attach a motor (preferable the same type which  powers the rotor) on the power output which spins faster than the rotor?
On the first video it is running itself, thats what I said and  that is what I mean. I fixed the problem it had with the wings. 

As long as you never call it an overunity machine I will tell you  everything. Overunity is voodoo science to me.

_______________________________________________

Ok, these answers get me into thinking. Regarding answer #2 I think there is definitely something to it. Also Airstriker seems to have realized what it is about in his own experiments and watching the above video (thanks for demonstration btw.), I find it really strange that the Rotor accelerates *because* of Lenz Law and not slows down, how come that?

[Airstriker]

Ok, these A get me into thinking. Regarding answer #2 I think there is definitely something to it. Also Airstriker seems to have realized what it is about in his own experiments and watching the above video (thanks for demonstration btw.), I find it really strange that the Rotor accelerates *because* of Lenz Law and not slows down, how come that?

Well, as you can see I had to post this video as you people would go off the rails - as always unfortunatelly and that's sad ;[ There is nothing against physics as for the rotor's acceleration. Pretty easy to explain using law of conservation of angular momentum and Newton's third law: law of reciprocal actions. Here you are:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V3UsrfHa4MQ