The downfalls of conventional electrolysis - and how to fix them

[markdansie]

Hi
I have looked at steve's video and it is clear there is an increase in production.
Mark

[ramset]

Mark
Garry saw an increase Too just PHFFITT no pop
I know Garry was doing a diferent experiment [non ferrous 300 series]
Does Stevie light it??
Before he starts to add the accelerator and after??
Show some kind of comparison??

Chet
PS
I am quite sure we will be hearing From Garry again Soon

He won't sleep till he knows!![cool Guy]

[markdansie]

Hi Ramset,
no test of gas (flame) was just a short video of the output in an open container. It showed the bubbles before then after...you could hear the device kick in it was audiable.
I was interested in seeing Gary's post...was it running when he tested it?
Ultimately we have to see what the total gas out put is to energy consumed including powering the accelorator (magnet).
Lets hope some more results come in
Mark

[ramset]

Thanks Mark
Yes Good questions
Especially Is there a bigger "bang" with the accelerator On??
Chet

[ramset]

Steves responce for more info
Quotes from here
http://www.ionizationx.com/index.php/topic,1471.new.html#new




Posts: 2086



Re: Resonant waterfuelcell project by Steve
« Reply #33 on: Today at 18:17:05 »QuoteI can comment on the video, but not too much.
I made a promise to a certain person and i have to ask him permission before to give all details.

The Plates are SS430
Power to the plates: 5v by 1.3amps
AC magnetic field.
Tapwater with a drop of NAOH

Thats what Mookie said and thats what it is..


regards
SteveReport to moderator    Logged

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Steve
Administrator
Hero member

Posts: 2086



Re: Resonant waterfuelcell project by Steve
« Reply #34 on: Today at 18:19:01 »QuoteQuote from: yaro on Today at 16:44:21
Are you pulsing the magnetic field? Are your plates shaking?

Yes and yes