Eric the free energy skeptic

[dracozny]

wow and i thought i was the only one who thought bearden was a nut!

really I dont trust anything that comes out of that guy, he has his own adgenda and has been know to spat out allot of misinformation for whaterver reason he has.
I do beleive in almost free energy. I say almost free because it still takes work from somewhere even if the work is only 10% of the produced energy it still doesnt constitute as 100% free. call it discounted if you will

[Jim_Mich]

When most of us speak of 'FREE ENERGY' many are talking about getting energy from some previously uknown source such as Zero Point Energy or Ether Energy. Once the mechanics are known of how to use this energy then we'll quickly realize that it is free in the same sense oil is free energy. Also wind, sunlight, biomass, wood, coal, hydro, ocean waves, gravity, etc. are free energy sources.

For every energy harnessing devise there is an energy source. What's important is whether there needs to be a middle-man between the source and the end user. Other aspects are initial and on-going costs of production, along with dependability and availability.

An ideal device would be something that gains unending perpetual energy from a steady free source like ZPE or gravity.

Jim_Mich

[PaulLowrance]

An ideal device would be something that gains unending perpetual energy from a steady free source like ZPE or gravity.

Actually the best source would be from ambient heat.  Such a device at room temperature or any temperature would merely move energy.  This would be great for global warming since it would not create any energy from any potential energy source and heat up the world.  If everyone had unlimited free energy then global warming would be far far far more dangerous than it apparently is becoming.

Yet, don't get me wrong.  I for one would be far more than happy to have any free energy regardless from ZPE as long as it's safe.  I am just suggesting that free energy from ambient heat is the best option for our planet.

Sincerely,
Paul

[hartiberlin]

Yes, Paul you are right, free energy from surrounding heat is a closed circle process,
where you just locally cool down the environment and when you use the produced
energy you just dissipate then again, so there is again heat produced.
So this would be the best clean cycle to get the energy and doesn?t have any
negative side effects.

Regards, Stefan.

[Paul-R]

I would like to believe your Bearden device works.? ?To the best of my knowledge, the Naudin site is censored to erase information from people who find error's in Bearden's claims........

What is your evidence for this statement?

I glanced at your site:
http://www.phact.org/e/z/bearden.htm
and it appears to me to be a strange patchwork of remarks from
people here and people there whose reputations and track record
are not made clear.