Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Relative Permittivity of Water

Started by Torana, October 14, 2010, 04:35:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

canufi

Quote from: Torana on June 02, 2012, 09:45:32 PM
If a walmart kettle is 99% eff then what is a water R eff ?

What the hell is a water R eff?  Water resistor efficiency?

The steam resonator is similar to a microwave but instead of using microwaves Stan vibrates the molecules. It's not the same as a kettle resistor. It's just a different way of heating water. Microwaves heat water differently and we still find microwaves useful, don't we?

Do you consider microwaves to be water resistors?  It's a different way of heating water.

Whether it is more efficient than a microwave is another question all together.

canufi

Quote from: Torana on June 03, 2012, 10:18:41 PM
Your calling everyone to work on motor gen sets , wouldnt it be more constructive if you yourself stepped up ?

I've already ordered 9XB circuits and all the electronic parts to build them and I have access to a 2HP generator, that if I get running I will apply for the 1 million dollar cheque from James Randi who says you cannot make Stan Meyer's device work.  I have only had difficulty ordering the Diodes but they are available, just costly compared to the other 99 cent parts.

I'm fully willing to accept that Stan was simply producing hydrogen efficiently at say 70 percent or 80 percent efficiency and therefore it is not pulling energy from some special source.

However he may have been using Brownian motion to bop the electron around or he may have been taking mass away from the water molecule, or even producing cold fusion, it is unlikely. He may have died from breathing in toxic gases from his EPG rather than the conspiracy that he was killed off and shot in the head.

canufi

Quote from: Torana on June 02, 2012, 09:52:57 PM
2:  when did I say " a variable L is BOGUS" ???

You said it was a  "unicorn coil, bogus."

You are on a smear campaign, your goal is to ridicule Stan. Look up "smear campaign" on wikipedia.

Please don't ridicule his electronics because we have photographs of his electronics and they match up exactly to his patents basically. look up the gary woodside and tony woodside stan meyer estate photographs.

In fact at Stan's estate they found the coils and his latest coil was a fixed one because he was done testing the variables. Once you find the perfect coil setup you no longer need a variable coil.  well you still may need one to make adjustments in the future.. but it is not a unicorn coil and it is not bogus.

There was a space found between the horse shoe ferrite cores, look up RWG research on youtube who has some info, and also Irondmax has the horse shoe cores.

I don't believe you need to spend the money on perfectly shaped cores I think the product can function using other style cores. Irondmax is selling them for quite a costly price because they are custom manufactured.

Torana

In EE and electronics "R" is universally = Resistance
post #25, I have to assume you havent read it ... there is no element!

A water R is old technology = Ive linked info in this thread
A water cap is ''   "       "     =   "        "             "
Sandia use the largest water caps = "     "      "

google effeciency of electric jugs or boiling water

Ive already seen T woodside , JL Naudin  etc videos   = nothing out of the ordinary.  Woodside added an LED!.   8XA has been copied exactly for decades.
No where have  I said SM ACTUAL devices did not work.
No where do I mention radiant enrgy, prana or over unity.

Most replicators have no previous EE or electronics experience or theory, if there were then SM info would be questioned and the circuits would need serious explaining.
any electronics mag has in depth circuit explanations and diagrams FAR more technical than the accepted 8XA etc
has anyone done a tech breakdown of Stans info,circ or patents??
not forgetting its been 31 yrs and hes been dead 14 of those.

has anyone done a tech break down of Puharich?......or Horvath??
the Horvath patent is the most detailed H patent there is......its also a pile of crap!!   but if a person doesnt know that, then they are open to it.     

Torana

I know full well SM followers are genuine in their efforts but to hammer away without considering if the info is a red herring or not , is crazy,  bordering on RANDOM.

IF...it were disinfo , how well has it worked the past 14 yrs?
lets say its 1998 ,stans alive ... how well has it kept people off the track??    81 to 98 =17yr!    combined total = 31 yrs!
No diff from Puharich,Horvath,hendershot,sweet,moray etc....

most claim SM was murdered, if so, why?....... because he had a car running on water.....
ok,  why kill him and not the invention/circuit??

most SM sites or threads take liberties and say.."this is what stan meant by..."   "this is what stan was trying to tell us...."    "stan didnt have the words to describe..."

And then theres definition of terms which gives people complete creative licience to spin what ever they want.
Peter lindemann is an example, I dare not mention any replicators ,  they seem to take it very personal.....   been there before.

I personally have never met stan meyers, I have only quoted what he himself wrote or said on tape.
From what Ive seen , SM followers are totally shut off or shut down to anything that is not written in the WFC tech brief.