Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Relative Permittivity of Water

Started by Torana, October 14, 2010, 04:35:01 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

Torana

I consider microwaves= microwaves!  ...and water = water!

is water the same in the diff heating examples ??
Is water the same in Puharich or Horvath cells?

its easy how those 2 are shut out of the very same subject.

I had a look at the photos = so what?
I also saw theres "new" news letters!   GOD knows I dont want those sent to me.

Ive already been told to tune in to RWG = post # 188.

post #189 = Bolton trust = Rea Oneill , according to stan (and therefore his followers) a worthy interpretation in the WFC report pdf.
**at all .... ask him, not ME!!

*****Unicorn coil = FIG 1-1 VIC (AA), FIG 1-14 EEC (BB)*****

how many layers does a variable slide coil have?? ?

If more than 1 then it is a tapped coil - NOT a wiper
a slug core is NOT a wiper
a moving core is NOT a wiper
a Ferranti coil is NOT a wiper

Torana

a smear campaign ?? based on what ??   we bot know you havent read this thread, there fore you mind was mad up before you walked in the door when you refer to "WE".

everything is text book, its all the bits the SM crowd have missed, none want to acknowledge theres a VW load of mistakes and lies in the tech brief... it NOT MY FAULT!!
stan wrote them himself.
has any body figured out what "BUM RATE" is referring to??  is that a Navy term ? or is isolated to Ohio? I dont know but No one on this planet has seemed to mention that 1.
why is that ?

does that mean stan started the smear campaign or does that mean anyone who points out mistakes is a heretic or on a smear campaign.
seems like a orchestrated divide and rule tactic set up by the man himself.

Do I have to apoligise to all those who have NO electrical knowledge or theory?    its their responsibility to gain knowledge on the subject

its getting to sound alot like a religion

Torana

Can you think of a SM site that acknowledges ALL of the mistakes in the info??
do you yourself acknowledge those mistakes?

If so , then... this thread falls in line with those SM followers who dare face the facts.

what the formula for Naphthalene by the way??......(quick off to the tech brief, last section)

canufi="photos of his electronics and they match up exactly to his patents"

does the patent legitimise the circuit photos or vice versa?
does that apply to ALL patents?   would a photo legitimise the Horvath patent?  or Puharich patent?

canufi = " If stans device actually works as described in his patents there is no need for trial and error since the trial and error had already been done by some one else"

"some one else " = there goes the responsibility bit I mentioned.

Is James Randi (whoever he is)  going to write out a cheque to T woodside,G woodside, Irondmax, canufi, H2Opower or should it be made out to Stephen Meyers??

So if the arabs offered stan 1 BIllion ,why would they LEAVE a working unit in the hands of DON for peanuts??

If you owe $100 to inland revenue , they will hunt you down and skin you
If you owe the Hells angels $100....your a statistic
Here in NZ , a guy got beaten to death over a PIZZA!!

...So is the energy industry and its share holders going to leave a stone unturned??
Go ask Warren Buffet, hes the guy over there in the suit , wondering where his next dollars gonna come from.

canufi

Quote from: Torana on June 12, 2012, 03:48:41 AM
a smear campaign ?? based on what ??   

You've lied several times in this thread. You are coming up with all kinds of conspiracies and spreading lies about how Stan's circuits are all bogus.

Stan's wire gauges have mistakes in them since he mixed up BWG with AWG, look up those figures and you will see what he calls AWG matches up with BWG.  Humans make mistakes like this, Stan made too many of them.

But as for his circuits, the ones at the Estate look exactly like the ones in his patents. You claim Stan was filling his circuits up with lies - then why is it that the Estate has the circuits match up exactly to the patents?

You claim that it is all "text book". That's not true. Physicists and scientists do not use Stan's method of water breakdown, they use something called salts or electrolytes, you idiot. If it was true Stan was "Text book" electrolysis then why is it that IrondMax used Distilled water, with no electrolytes? And was still able to break down the water? why is it that Stan's estate also can use distilled water?


If that's the case then Stan's estate should show us that his circuits do not match up to his patents. We should find at his estate that the circuits have been modified to be completely different than what the patents show.

This is not the case. Tony and Gary Woodside have photographs showing that the circuits and the cells are exactly as he described in the patents.

BUM RATE is a microfishe or photocopying error, it is BURN rate.  burn rate can be converted to BUM in optical character recognition errors.

Stop whining and complaining like a little 3 year old girl. you're an idiot.

If you don't know who James Randi is, you're really mentally retarded. Look him up, you fool.

Torana

  Mighty powerful words there pard'ner  :-*

canufi  "his latest coil uses a fixed 1 because he was done testing the variables.
Once you find the perfect set up you no longer need a variable coil"

The symbol used in FIG1-1VIC  has an arrow slide onto the L .
A variable L has an international symbol of an arrow across an L...BIG difference.

Ive linked plenty of info to find it,  TRY it!

A variable coil tuned to a f then made NON variable **negates variable L in FIG 1-1 VIC, thus rendering it = UNICORN COIL!!   oopps!

1981 to 1998 = 17 yrs
Why was there no correction to his propaganda ( use dictionary)
understandably he cant change IT now ...BUT IT was fully within his power to change IT before 1998!  DID HE??

what does the prototype Vari L look like BEFORE arriving at the final "Tuned" NON adjustable fixed L??
Is it  single layer with a wiper arm?  if so it MUST be very, VERY LONG!!

SM crowd choose to adhere to 11.6 K as a bench mark...not at all knowing why.
Did SM use a wiper arm?  Does ANYONE use a wiper arm??

** Th e use of a wipoer arm requires that insulation be removed from **each adjacent turn of wire . Are there ANY examples ??    ..Take a photo!

Anyone familiar with Xtal radios knows exactly what one is.  Those that dont.....Dont!!