New permanent magnet motor on youtube from Roobert33

[Magluvin]

Hi,
please help with info.
is that true that neodinuim magnets getting old (degradating)  at such working way as it is shown on the video and loosing its magnetic power on 7-10% per year?

Not quite.   It would take temperatures above 170 deg F or an extreme pulse to degrade a Neo mag. With Neo's you should get many many years of use out of them.  ;]
No monkeys here.  ;]

Mags

[Scorch]

It appears this thread is pretty dead with no posts from January to October but I am here to see if there is any possibility of learning anything more.

From what I can determine; this appears to be a relatively simple device to replicate and, YET, nobody has actually built the same thing!
Even CLaNZeR appears to have it wrong including the lack of lightweight design, ferrite pieces, single bar magnet on top and trigger magnet on bottom... All MISSING from his build.

Is the right place? Is there another, more up to date, thread on this device?

After doing a quick review of Robert Calloway's page regarding this motor, I see KEY ingredients that MUST be included:
#1 Rotor is ferrite rods; NOT magnets.
#2 Top magnet is SINGLE bar.
#3 Helper 'trigger' magnet at bottom.
#4 All lightweight, non-ferrous, construction materials.

See:
http://www.callowayengines.com/msg3.htm

I have done a word search through this entire forum and NOBODY has used the word: "ferrite"!

How can this be?
Robert's page CLEARLY states: "... the rotor wheel is not made or covered with magnets. It is made with ferrite pieces."
Did he write that AFTER January when nobody was paying attention?

I come here with the questions:
What type of ferrite has a polished, shiny, appearance?
What PARTICULAR ferrite material/formula is suggested?
What dimensions might be suggested for the ferrite pieces?
How many ferrite pieces were used?
Are there off-the-shelf ferrite rods that might be suitable?
What are the dimensions of the top & bottom magnets?

Some of you are pretty good at dissecting video in your attempts to debunk it.
But can you examine the video and try to answer some of my questions regarding the materials used?

Please respond.

Kindest regards.

[Arrow]

Not quite.   It would take temperatures above 170 deg F or an extreme pulse to degrade a Neo mag. With Neo's you should get many many years of use out of them.  ;]
No monkeys here.  ;]

Mags

Hi dear Mags,
Sorry for my English Sir,
with your temperature statement I am agree  on 100%, but I am not agree with statement that magnets will not have degradation from pulse operation as far as even short pulse of same pole such as N to N or S to S will change structure of magnets pre magnetized metal domens any way. I had call to one of the famous Russia Res. Institutes in Moscow who are busy with super conductivity (SRI of High Temperature ) research and had conversation about neodymium magnets with one of the famous engineers(he was a friend of my friends) - I was advised and informed that magnets getting old at static work at position N to N pole or S to S and loosing about max. 7-10% per year... also it depends of course from the gap of two magnets, as mush it is close and small - that much the magnets degradations become faster.
I am interesting about that and want to know if anyone here measured by digital gauss meters degradations speed in 1 year of such systems? What is the results? I am sure US Patents 4151431 working from 79 year, there must be results. Very interesting to know such information  to calculate such motors life time to next magnet change time when degradations will rise to 20% level.

Grate thanks in advance for future information!

Truly,
Rob

[Arrow]

Off course cause that is the great secret of monkey bussiness       

Hi, I am sorry I don’t know what is the meaning of "monkey business" but I want to say here that this motor not braking The law of conservation of energy  as far as it is using magnet accumulated energy which was preliminary “pumped” to the rare-earth threw (metal) by electrical energy impulse that was pre generated by human created different AC power plants or otherwise. If you are not agree with this statment then it is very interesting to know your positon and tech explanations about The law of conservation of energy and artificially created by human magnets behavior.
Truly,
Rob

[Honk]

The law of conservation of energy and artificially created by human magnets behavior.

No it's not. The conservation of energy is a basic law of nature and it has nothing to do with human interaction.
Being a law of nature means it cannot be broken in any way, at least not by humans knowledge of today.
Every proper test performed since the dawn of physics points to physics being 100% correct and magnetism is 100% conservative.
No free lunch here....please move on folks....