AMAZING NEW VIDEO BY THANE HEINS

[tesletic]

Thank you all for your enlightening replies to say the least Although I must say this what  woopyjump
did with this test is very promising and sure will give all those wind-mails out there a lot of more power ! See http://youtu.be/kNVdVrny8s4

Never the less I still am sure there is an abundance of RADIANT (call it whatever you want) energy to be tapped into out there ! Like this I think Clarence is on it's way to become famous !
http://overunity.com/13721/energy-from-the-ground-self-powered-generator-by-barbosa-and-leal/msg434141/#msg434141

What a great site this is ! Thanks again all, still hoping one day to my 400km on only RADIANT !  http://tesletic.com/

PS. Just saw this MUST SEE video what explains eventually what you already explained !
BiTT Bi-Toroid Transformator(from Thane Heins) - Replication - Testing(german, english) http://youtu.be/j-dZj4-PU9s

[synchro1]

bobo, think for a moment. Zero Watts input, electrically.... means NO POWER INPUT. Therefore.... why does the device need to be hooked up to a functioning input power supply then?

Since it manifestly won't run without being hooked up to an input power source, the "zero Watts" measurement of input power is OBVIOUSLY incorrect. Whether it's less than the measured output or greater is an important issue.... but with "measurements" and reasoning like these, how will you or anyone else ever be able to tell?

@TinselKoala,

It's wrong to say there's no power input because zero watts are consumed. If the load is purely reactive, on average exactly as much energy flows back from the load to the source as flows to the load from the source, so there's no net energy flow!

"In a simple alternating current (AC) circuit consisting of a source and a linear load, both the current and voltage are sinusoidal. If the load is purely resistive, the two quantities reverse their polarity at the same time. At every instant the product of voltage and current is positive, indicating that the direction of energy flow does not reverse. In this case, only active power is transferred.

If the loads are purely reactive, then the voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase. For half of each cycle, the product of voltage and current is positive, but on the other half of the cycle, the product is negative, indicating that on average, exactly as much energy flows toward the load as flows back. There is no net energy flow over one cycle. In this case, only reactive power" flows—there is no net transfer of energy to the load.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2H5BerC9Go

Thane explains at 1:20 in this video how the red scope trace shows power coming in and power returning to the source.

[minnie]

      Hi,
         in Industry we have to pay for reactive power, you have a contact and there is
a charge when your PF. gets below say 9. To get round this you can use a switchable
capacitor bank which continually monitors PF. and adjusts the capacitance automatically.
    Put a wind turbine on the roof of your car and you've got free energy! It's not
correct to say there is no input, show the thing working without the grid connection.
           John.

[tesletic]

I wrote him on his YT channel asking for a reaction on the German replication !?  would be interesting what comes from that  !
http://youtu.be/j-dZj4-PU9s

@TinselKoala,

It's wrong to say there's no power input because zero watts are consumed. If the load is purely reactive, on average exactly as much energy flows back from the load to the source as flows to the load from the source, so there's no net energy flow!

"In a simple alternating current (AC) circuit consisting of a source and a linear load, both the current and voltage are sinusoidal. If the load is purely resistive, the two quantities reverse their polarity at the same time. At every instant the product of voltage and current is positive, indicating that the direction of energy flow does not reverse. In this case, only active power is transferred.

If the loads are purely reactive, then the voltage and current are 90 degrees out of phase. For half of each cycle, the product of voltage and current is positive, but on the other half of the cycle, the product is negative, indicating that on average, exactly as much energy flows toward the load as flows back. There is no net energy flow over one cycle. In this case, only reactive power" flows—there is no net transfer of energy to the load.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k2H5BerC9Go

Thane explains at 1:20 in this video how the red scope trace shows power coming in and power returning to the source.

[synchro1]

There is nothing special about this whatsoever.  A standard off the shelf transformer can do the same and yes creating PF 0 condition is the same as infinite VSWR and scaler operation. "WE" those of us in the know have been talking about this for YEARS on here but no one pays attention.  Using a 3 phase motor into PF 0 condition can light a THOUSAND WATT bulb and consume only a couple of watts leakage from PF 0 so forget 18 watts its kids stuff.

Any measurement meter will show ZERO power consumption and it is correct cos there isn't any power when PF is 0. Problem is Thane serving this on a Xmas Platter but we knew this for long time.

@Bolt,

Do you have any links to tests or data of any kind on this setup?