Gravity motor concept design

[solardark]

could someone please post a link to the scissor effect discussion on abeling's thread. the search i did returned something about patents instead.

[spinn_MP]

could someone please post a link to the scissor effect discussion on abeling's thread. the search i did returned something about patents instead.

Just search for the "Sjack Abeling" thread. It's quite informative...
You may find some unpleasant information about the Omnibot's science, though...

Entering at your own risk...

[Low-Q]

hi all. I have a concept design that I have been trying to fault for almost a year now. the system seems capable of producing a consistent unidirectional torque. I was hoping someone here may be interested in investigating the design. i have attached pictures of the system showing the way the end product would look. feel free to input figures in the drawing as you see fit.

note: the flat side of the supports is the chord the of inner circle. the sector angle of that chord is 90 degrees at the center. pic 6 shows that clearly. Also a four armed system (pic 6) would result in a minimum torque value of  zero at the position shown. the six arm system keeps torque consistently above zero.

I really hope someone with good workshop experience can try this out and let us all know if it's workable.

sola oladosu
dishour@yahoo.com

Just that the weights have to return to the same hight for each revolutions, says this wheel cannot produce excess energy. Consider the time it takes for each wheight to go from top to the bottom versus the time it takes for them to go from the bottom to the top. It will take the very same time. When the hight is the same as well, there should be no reason why this wheel work.

When the "overbalanced" part goes down, the mass in the opposite side must accelerate and deaccelerate in order to follow the different path on its way up. This acceleration of the mass will compensate for the "overbalanced" side and equalize the time it takes for each masses to reach the bottom and the top respectively - thus the energy given and taken from each side will stay the same.

Vidar

[AB Hammer]

solardark

Welcome to the forum, and thanks for posting. The design you have shown has several problems like catch corners, magnetic drag (which you need to address in the design), only 1 arm free moving per turn and 2 arms under extra friction. Let me clarify the free mover is 1 but for a short time you have two but only one for a full rotations but switching to make that one alone, the push arrow is the direction you magnet weight has to push. Every turn you have 12 corner catches. It only took me a glance to see the problems. Understanding what you have to beat is what you need to learn. Good luck

Alan

[solardark]

forget the catch thingi.we can solve that by using a larger radius at the corners.pls elaborate on the push issue instead