Shorting coil gives back more power

[giantkiller]

@Romerouk,
Great Pic! The 4 layer wrap at the end is pure genius for who ever thought that up. 

[romerouk]

@Romerouk, all

OKay so that diagram makes sense, but what are the winding directions, and do they matter?   And that winding looks CCW with respect to the left of the diagram, but why is the output wire coming off the end?

Wouldn't a CCW winding go down the core to the end, then come back say 20% of the core, then be taken off as output lead?

What is the core material?  (Ferrite?  Powdered Iron?   Rusty Nail?)

I see a 1cm gap to the right of the image, but what about to the left of the image?  Is there a gap there, or does the core touch the magnet on the left?

What is the diameter of the core?

How many total leads come off the windings on the core (2 leads?  4 leads?)?

What is the strength and composition of the magnets?

etc

Thanks,
Feynman

The winding is normal from left to the right then back for the second layer then when finished the second layer jump with the wire to the half of the core and continue winding in the same direction.When we get to the right hand side continue winding to the left but now only to the half of the coil where you stop and continue winding again to the right.Direction for the winding not very important, just test the coil to get attraction on the left and repulsion on the right.You might have NN or SS, depending of the coil winding.
On the left hand side the magnet is in contact with the core.
The wire I used is 1mm, not sure how many turns (about 150) but make sure you have 2 full layers then another 2 to the half of the coil.You can try even more layers on the right hand side, that will make that side stronger.
The core I use is ferrite 2.5cm square , might work with other materials too.
The magnets I use are 5 x 5/2.5/1 cm on the left side and 1x 5/2.5/1 cm on the right hand side, all neodymium n48.
We have 2 wires comming out as from a normal coil.

[romerouk]

@Romerouk,
Great Pic! The 4 layer wrap at the end is pure genius for who ever thought that up. 

I thought that after trying many different windings and realised that I need much stronger field to cancel the magnet field.Maybe more windings on the right hand side will do better, I must make a new coil and try but for now I am still working on the shorting coil setup.

[bolt]

I thought that after trying many different windings and realised that I need much stronger field to cancel the magnet field.Maybe more windings on the right hand side will do better, I must make a new coil and try but for now I am still working on the shorting coil setup.

So just to reiterate for the record can you say again what COP you got from this about 1.7? The reason i ask i know this can work given bench time and money to get the details ironed out but so many people have said for years magnacoaster can not work and its a hoax.  I love you to put the record straight that your tests have shown it CAN go OU.

[romerouk]

So just to reiterate for the record can you say again what COP you got from this about 1.7? The reason i ask i know this can work given bench time and money to get the details ironed out but so many people have said for years magnacoaster can not work and its a hoax.  I love you to put the record straight that your tests have shown it CAN go OU.

I have got about 1.7 COP with the mechanical version.I have tested the solid state version too but with simillar results. People where talking here about Magnacoasters and I posted my results.I don't think this one is a hoax but ofcourse, this is my opinion not a crime.This is the reason we are here, to share info.
I have got those results without this type of coil I posted early and after playing with the setup from GAP Power I built this type of coil and got much better results. Since then, I have not done proper measurements but I am confident that this coil will increase the COP.
People should try this type of coil even in other setups and see the results.

All the best,
RomeroUK