Rosemary Ainslie circuit demonstration on Saturday March 12th 2011

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Guys,

it seems that Glen is in a PANIC.  He is trying very hard to distract you all from a rather PERTINENT
QUESTION which he is entirely reluctant to answer.  He's damned if he does and he's damned if he
doesn't.  So.  One can understand his dilemma - but that hardly excuses it.

Since you're there Glen.  May we all impose on you to answer this question.  Here it is again.  You
see the problem is that unless this is answered then none of us knows how to answer Cat's claim
that there have been NO REPLICATIONS of that early rather OUTMODED - and somewhat
OBSOLETE circuit that you reference with such tedious repetition.

Here's that question AGAIN

Can I impose on someone here to ask Glen a simple question? Here it is.  Did he replicate that
circuit widely, and possibly incorrectly, referenced as 'the Ainslie Circuit'? It's a question that can
be answered very simply but confined to two options - 'yes' or 'no'.   

IF THE ANSWER IS NO - then - the next question is this.  Why is he clinging on for dear life to a
publication in his SCRIBD FILE that claims that he HAS replicated the Ainslie circuit?  The
PRIMARY AUTHOR OF THAT PAPER is Rosemary Ainslie.  His own name is down there as an
experimentalist.  The preamble, introduction and discussions related to that paper unequivocally
state that it is a REPLICATION.  Therefore when he says NO he is lying.

IF THE ANSWER IS YES - then I rest my case.

It's that simple.

It's a very pertinent question.  It's dominated the subject of this thread for the last 20 pages or so.

Regards, again,
Rosemary

[Magluvin]

Golly rosy, just because Fuzzy has proved you as the liar that you are, Why are you taking it out on me?

Mental confusion? Looking at what Fuzzy is saying and Cat has said all along, do you think that it may be you who is
mentally confused?

At least I'm not delusional and I don't flat out lie to people.

I really don't think it matters how many people tell you that 1+1=2. You will always say that 1+1=3, we just don't understand the new math.
Maybe you should try to get that waitress job back.

Hmm Rose, these are some very valid points here in this quote above that seem to truly show that your circuit does not work.  Astounding evidence! 

lol

Mags   ;]

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Hmm Rose, these are some very valid points here in this quote above that seem to truly show that your circuit does not work.  Astounding evidence! 

lol

Mags   ;]

Take care Magsy - and let me know if Fuzzy ever answers that question of ours.  I really want to
see that!  I am now going to get back to some work.

Kindest as ever,
Rosie

[MrMag]

Hmm Rose, these are some very valid points here in this quote above that seem to truly show that your circuit does not work.  Astounding evidence! 

lol

Mags   ;]

Not really, I think your reading more into it. That post was regarding rosy getting caught in her lies. She just isn't very smooth getting out of this one.

[powercat]

THERE HAVE ONLY BEEN REPLICATIONS OF OUR PREVIOUS CIRCUIT. 


Rosemary

Are you finally admitting that your PREVIOUS CIRCUIT didn't work as you claim, you had no excess energy at all.

You attack anyone who disagrees with you, you refuse to do any long-term tests that might prove your circuit works as you claim.

It's a big conspiracy, it would appear that anyone that says your circut doesn't workor or indicate's a measuring error, is then part of a conspiracy.

Your understanding of how you should conduct yourself on this forum is ridiculous, and you wonder why the scientific community won't recognise your work as valid.

Many members have made reasonable requests that you ignore including Stefan,Mr Mag amongst others,but you ignore them and carry on regurgitating your same old arguments.

Go on Rosie proof that 99 is wrong in his analysis and makes something that runs and runs and put it on the Internet after all,
(Quote from Rosemary)
"All one needs are the the measurements and some reasonable account of the apparatus that produces those measurements".

If you are going to claim excess energy on this forum you are expected to interact with reasonable requests for new tests, I think that it's only reasonable when making such claims.