Hydro Differential pressure exchange over unity system.

[Red_Sunset]

Just my opinion -
I think it might be an "anomaly" to pay for something (lift a load and take it off)...
and then get all your money back (exhaust value = to input)  Every time.
Why it works is the brain teaser.....have fun 
What can do nothing without its head, what does work when storing its head, and does more work when giving its head away? A ZED. 
p.s. really good mood - our optimized six layer system just tested "twice" as efficient "more" than we have ever reported!
In about three weeks - you will hear all about it!
Wayne

Just my opinion - That is my opinion too....
"I think it might be an "anomaly" to pay for something (lift a load and take it off)...  and then get all your money back (exhaust value = to input)  Every time. "
Yep...as you have said a hundred times before, to get your money back takes saving !  Saving is something forgotten, everybody wants to spend, immediate returns...ect.  No surprise we have a deficit and financial crisis.  but aren't you stretching it a little bit by "(exhaust value = to input)  Every time." Which bank gives you that?

From my observations of the posted material that I see, it has a similarity to the business trends that followed President Reagan, after the dismantling and consolidations of small to medium businesses in the eighties. Everybody wanted immediate returns, only short term plans to maximize short term stock value and director bonuses counted. China featured big time in this strategy. This all came to a head in the first years of the 2000's and the crisis that followed and it is still going on (because the root cause is not solved).

Looking for an immediate return in the ZED is alike to the stock exchange crash.  Be patient, have a strategy, save and invest and reap the harvest along the way. 

Wayne, what surprises me the most is that your "golden egg discovery", the discovery that will find its place in the physic books has already been overtaken by your new novel input device. What an unbelievable DOUBLE WHAMMY !!! 
I am pretty sure, we haven't seen the end of related discoveries....

Don't loose your head no matter what the returns and don't let anybody stop you !   
Regards, Michel

[TinselKoala]

p.s. really good mood - our optimized six layer system just tested "twice" as efficient "more" than we have ever reported!
In about three weeks - you will hear all about it!
Wayne

One photograph is worth a thousand words, MrWayne.

Do you intend to build up a new, six-layer system with your new bagless assist, for Mark Dansie to validate, or are you still trying to get the old system to run for more than four hours?

And Red_Sunset is inadvertently bringing up an important point: Your device now seems to be violating Conservation of Miracles.

[Red_Sunset]

.............." Your device now seems to be violating Conservation of Miracles."

Dear Tinselkoala,
I think we (me included) can still learn quite a lot on, what is normal, what is a violation...ect. We see the Thermodynamics as absolute in black and white. I am sure it is like that for most situations but at he same time I believe that our vision is a limited one.  To think that conversion of mass is the ONLY method to create energy is limited the viewpoint, notwithstanding it is a common one. Do we know what happen in unbalanced situation ?  You would say, no I have never seen one.

Wayne has demonstrated for several people (who wanted to see), who were prepared to explore his inventive visionary concept that there are windows that can bypass the known symmetry. Once you have explored that and you are assured of it being a fact, are you going to ignore it because it doesn't fit the understanding of "the law". 
Does it make it less true because it doesn't fit the law ?  The proof on the pudding will say what is the truth.
Would it make the law wrong ?  or does expand our vision and might need to add some amendments to the law?

You can call it  "Conservation of Miracles",  having two miracle techniques in his back pocket is definitely a great achievement for one inventor. Two markedly different techniques that violate as you say it, the sacred high ground, is not something to sniff at.
I am not surprised why his IP is not pasted all over the web. Doing so has shown to do not good.

Regards, Michel

[mrwayne]

Just my opinion - That is my opinion too....
"I think it might be an "anomaly" to pay for something (lift a load and take it off)...  and then get all your money back (exhaust value = to input)  Every time. "
Yep...as you have said a hundred times before, to get your money back takes saving !  Saving is something forgotten, everybody wants to spend, immediate returns...ect.  No surprise we have a deficit and financial crisis.  but aren't you stretching it a little bit by "(exhaust value = to input)  Every time." Which bank gives you that?

From my observations of the posted material that I see, it has a similarity to the business trends that followed President Reagan, after the dismantling and consolidations of small to medium businesses in the eighties. Everybody wanted immediate returns, only short term plans to maximize short term stock value and director bonuses counted. China featured big time in this strategy. This all came to a head in the first years of the 2000's and the crisis that followed and it is still going on (because the root cause is not solved).

Looking for an immediate return in the ZED is alike to the stock exchange crash.  Be patient, have a strategy, save and invest and reap the harvest along the way. 

Wayne, what surprises me the most is that your "golden egg discovery", the discovery that will find its place in the physic books has already been overtaken by your new novel input device. What an unbelievable DOUBLE WHAMMY !!! 
I am pretty sure, we haven't seen the end of related discoveries....

Don't loose your head no matter what the returns and don't let anybody stop you !   
Regards, Michel

Thank you Michel,
Very Wise!
I have noticed a pattern - those who do not look through the whole process - never seem to understand how we save the energy.
Your process flow chart - I posted a month ago has really helped - thank you.
I just think it will expand the thinking - since our system can be proven by the current physics - it just means the conclusions need adjusted.
my opinion.
Wayne

[mondrasek]

I think it might be an "anomaly" to pay for something (lift a load and take it off)...
and then get all your money back (exhaust value = to input)  Every time.

And that does continue to go through my head:  The output weight is NOT needed to reset the system when the input is removed.  SO, if the input is equal to the output on the upstroke (if it were that case), why can I remove the output and the system still gives back that same input?