Free Energy prize money

[profitis]

My cells are not complex and were published on an open forum and definitely did open doors for my career.there's a handful of other peoples noncomplex overunities on youtube too.so why did these actions not change the world @sarkeizen.its like I said,these things are ignored by those who can change geists ie.they receive no general importance,only local importance ie.important to the authors career.since they are only important to the authors career,they won't have the impact that you are imagining they will have.they won't be validated by the numero-uno validator when majority of people want validation from the numero-uno validator before they believe anything

[profitis]

Also I forgot to mention that authors generaly want to be novel in their publications and will be unlikely to copy another prior author which makes overunity all the more difficult to promulgate.now each author has to find his own shit and not copy and look like a copycat

[sarkeizen]

My cells are not complex and were published on an open forum and

Did you submit to a journal for publication?  Yes or no?  If yes please provide a copy of your paper and the referee comments.  My guess is no.  In which case your complaint is irrelevant.  The fact is you are asking people to believe that out of BILLIONS of people, each and every one - according to you can demonstrate in a utterly unambiguous way that there is absolutely no doubt that they have a OU device.  Not one of them attempted to publish?  Not one of the attempts succeeded?

So far your only objections are:

i) What's in it for them?  This was answered, not only the same advancement that other people who publish get but also a chance at a million dollars.
ii) Why didn't it happen to you?  You didn't get published primarily because you did not attempt it.
iii) They have a vested interest in energy IP.  Only accounts for a microscopic portion of the group.
iv) Novelty in publication.   You simply misunderstand the concept.  Firstly novelty isn't really as strictly enforced as one might wish and secondly it's usually compared to published work.  There is no clear, realized and unambiguous OU published work.  In fact if you look at the publication guidelines from the SAGE group of journals.  Point 1, paragraph one it lists "the conventional wisdom is mistaken" as criteria for considering your contribution novel.  Ergo it's a pretty low bar to pass and especially so in OU.
v) Something about some made up "numero uno".   As someone who has some visibility into publishing in journals I'd say that there is no such thing.  A journal has an editorial board, each article will have reviewers/referees these can come from the board or sometimes suggested by the submitter.  However there is no grand cabal.  No black helicopters arrive to make sure we follow the guidance from our shadowy masters.

So again BILLIONS of potentials, ZERO published articles.   Evidence suggest OU is either not as easy as you say OR it doesn't work.

[profitis]

Makes no difference.you can shove a clean clear overunity experiment into the filthy open forums or the 'prestigious' journals the outcome is the same.your career gets a boost,you get some micro-fame, that's as far as it goes.tell you what @sarkeizen do me a favour and talk to the noble prize peeps there by you please,ask them if they are willing to dish out a million for a 2lot violation evidence,tell them that they may do this quietly if they prefer,sort of slot me in un-noticed.we (you and me) split the cash even stevens if you can get this organised.

[sarkeizen]

Makes no difference.you can shove a clean clear overunity experiment into the filthy open forums or the 'prestigious' journals the outcome is the same.

Sorry, you have no opinion here.   You have never submitted your OU nonsense to a journal. 

talk to the noble prize peeps there by you please,ask them if they are willing to dish out a million for a 2lot violation evidence

A million dollars is the Nobel Prize award.  So you will get that if you win.

Tell you what.  You can have an opportunity to show me you're right.  Get an article which clearly and unambiguously states the discovery of over unity in ANY journal with a SJR rank of 1.8 or greater and if you don't win the Nobel prize within two years of publication.  I'll give you $2000.