Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



PhysicsProf Steven E. Jones circuit shows 8x overunity ?

Started by JouleSeeker, May 19, 2011, 11:21:55 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 46 Guests are viewing this topic.

conradelektro

Quote from: hartiberlin on June 26, 2011, 06:23:01 PM
P.P.S: When tuning the circuit we tested today at Per-Johan´s place, I saw, that it works like a Joule Ringer circuit.
Changing the Base current pot just changes the frequency of the Spikes and the waveforms looks very simular to the waveforms of a JouleRinger.

The 3rd coil on the core is the easiest way to get rid of the different DC level problems when you want to feedback the output to the input.

Regards, Stefan.


@Stefan: I like Per-Johan's idea (the third coil on the toroid). May be Per-Johan is willing to provide more details of his circuit (value of capacitor and resistor at the base of the transistor, which transistor, number of wire turns on the toroid).

Greetings, Conrad

conradelektro

Quote from: xee2 on June 29, 2011, 12:34:34 AM
2 uA Joule thief. Video at >>>  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8T9HQkDnIuU&feature=mfu_in_order&list=UL

@xee2: may be one can combine Per-Johan's idea (third coil on the toroid with full bridge rectifier) and your low power JT circuit in order to feed back power to the 10.000µF capacitor? This should reduce the power consumption even more.

Greetings, Conrad

nul-points

 
Quote from: JouleSeeker on June 28, 2011, 08:22:45 PM
  I found it!  I must say, Nul-Pts always provides intriguing posts, and I found this in a posting of his in May
[...]
Nul-points post, and if you care to comment further NP, I'm all ears!!
[...]


thanks for the kind words as always, Steven...

i'll just bask in those words a little longer - before having to point out that your quote about OU statistics must have been posted by someone** other than me!  :)
[EDIT:  ** it was by toranarod]

here is my contribution to the list of reported OU development, hopefully with a reasonably mainstream emphasis:-

rauen
http://www.peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Rauen_Environmental_Heat_Engine

sheenan
http://paradigmcontent.s3.amazonaws.com/paradigm%20magazine%20article.pdf

dragone
http://www.overunity.com/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=3842.0;attach=52700

turtur
http://www.wbabin.net/physics/turtur1e.pdf

kanarev
http://pesn.com/2010/10/13/9501712_Kanarev_announces_self-running_motor-generator/

rossi
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy_Catalyzer


these are just a sample, or review, of some of the work which these people have been doing

thanks
np


http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

nul-points

 
Quote from: xee2 on June 29, 2011, 12:57:53 AM
energy calculation for 2 uA Joule thief:

10,000 uF capacitor
start voltage = 1.358
end voltage = 0.599
time = 84 minutes = 84 * 60 seconds = 5040 sec.

Joules = 0.5*C*(V1^2 - V2^2) = 0.5*10000e-6*(1.358^2 - 0.599^2) = 0.0074

watts = Joules / seconds = 0.0074 / 5040 =  1.468 uW

hi Xee2

this result based on a start voltage of 1.3V and an end voltage of 0.6V, along with the previous test runs we did from 1.5V (?) to 1.1V, really highlights how the power consumption falls with supply voltage

you can see that your initial continuous DC Power in at 1.36V & 2mA is 2.72uW, yet your overall average is 1.47uW

obviously the lower the end voltage, the lower the average DC power value that we'll measure for a particular test

hence Steven's guideline of a voltage range between 2.55V and 1.5V  for reference purposes (also, using 1000uF caps, for direct time comparisons, of course)
"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra

nul-points

 
Quote from: conradelektro on June 29, 2011, 02:58:58 AM
@Stefan: I like Per-Johan's idea (the third coil on the toroid). May be Per-Johan is willing to provide more details of his circuit (value of capacitor and resistor at the base of the transistor, which transistor, number of wire turns on the toroid).

Greetings, Conrad

hi Conrad

the tertiary winding approach looks good, but my experiences with it (posted earlier in this thread, post #163, 3rd Jun'11) suggest that it's main benefit is in decoupling the pulse o/p from the DC biasing necessary for the oscillator
(see first schematic below)

the most 'efficient' config i've been able to achieve has been to use a different approach to Looping and DC Decoupling and remove the tertiary winding altogether
(see second schematic below)

utilising both +ve & -ve o/p pulses also gave an increase in input current draw, so having a FWBR on the o/p (with the additional loss in forward voltage drops of 2 diodes, rather than a half-wave rectifier) doesn't appear to be a good way to go (in this circuit)

hope this helps
np

http://docsfreelunch.blogspot.com



"To do is to be" ---  Descartes;
"To be is to do"  ---  Jean Paul Sarte;
"Do be do be do" ---  F. Sinatra