Romero's experiments and OU principles

[xenomorphlabs]

Thank you, i have just looked at it now.
I would like to see this test done again with a load. I have someone here and on youtube (User2718218)who thinks that is no benefit at all having diodes in parallel.
This person talks  in very elevated technical words, maybe he is a clever guy but today he addressed a lot of injuries to me and I will just love to pay it pack nicely with a good demonstration and shut his mouth or learn how to speak.
Mister User2718218 I am maybe not as clever as you think you are but that does not make me smaller than you. I am just a simple and normal person, I am not pretending to be the Great man, The Big man,... as you said in your unlimited posts on youtube today.
We are born the same, what you have inside is the most important, that really makes a difference, Knowledge is an Addon.

Best Regards,
Romero

You can always block a certain user from your youtube channel or delete posts.
As soon as someone calls you names or just tries to steal your time in a non-constructive manner,
it's time to just put him on the ban-list. Saves your nerves enormously and it's your good right.
Keep it up

By the way: 1 simple question. Can you verify the connections on your special
coil you once posted? There is some controversy about the diode directions and what rail they are connected to. I think it is a very interesting connection and might even try it out, before making my opinion about it.

[romerouk]

@xenomorphlabs
Hi,
I have posted this picture only for a second or two then I removed it. I saw that someone made a copy very quick I realized that it should not be posted especially at that time...
I can tell you that it will do nice work, this is a different form of energy transfer but as it is in the picture will not work for these rotating magnets... this was made for solid state device, high frequency.
Bruce did some testing withe the same ideea but you need to change the order of the diodes on the right hand side.

[romerouk]

people pay attention to 'bolt' posting,  he is describing another way to do this and he is right, actually using capacitors will take you there more easy, if not, you need to build the coils according to many factors to replace what the capacitors will do.

[teslaalset]

@RomeroUK,

So, you basically told us the wrong way in the beginning?
1) No extra capacitors in the circuit, otherwise you had told us
2) No hints towards special winding?
I strongly doubt that. I think you were very to the point back then.

I hope you are sincere about this and not trying to get us off the hook on purpose.
To be honest I have the impression you were more trustworthy at the start of all this and not being straight forward right now.
With all respect.

[Magluvin]

@RomeroUK,

So, you basically told us the wrong way in the beginning?
1) No extra capacitors in the circuit, otherwise you had told us
2) No hints towards special winding?
I strongly doubt that. I think you were very to the point back then.

I hope you are sincere about this and not trying to get us off the hook on purpose.
To be honest I have the impression you were more trustworthy at the start of all this and not being straight forward right now.
With all respect.

And Romero posted this just before...

people pay attention to 'bolt' posting,  he is describing another way to do this and he is right, actually using capacitors will take you there more easy, if not, you need to build the coils according to many factors to replace what the capacitors will do.


From this I assume the coils need to be bifi,  err 7fi ?  ;]

Thats the only way I know to add capacitance without actual caps added. ;] Of which, Romero would be correct in stating that adding real caps would be easier, as a bifi or 7fi might be difficult to achieve the same capacitance per coil unless they are wound very neatly and consistent to each other. And even then may need tuning.


Mags