PLEASE READ THIS-MAJOR BREAK THRU FROM BILL MEHESS

[billmehess]

Each test run is for 60 seconds when the run is finished disconnect the cap and short it to return its reading to 0.00 for the next test.
The device always goes up in voltage after the run. There is usually a 15 min pause between each run so the cap and short and the voltage stablize. The device is not charging anything at that time.
Darn good performance increase would'nt you say?
Bill

[altrez]

Each test run is for 60 seconds when the run is finished disconnect the cap and short it to return its reading to 0.00 for the next test.
The device always goes up in voltage after the run. There is usually a 15 min pause between each run so the cap and short and the voltage stablize. The device is not charging anything at that time.
Darn good performance increase would'nt you say?
Bill

Heck yeah! How long for cap to reach input voltage? Have you tested that?

-Altrez

[JouleSeeker]

You're right, Chet -- no need to respond to ad hominem attacks.  Now back to the science --
Thanks, Bill, for these measurements.  But I need to check your "decimal point" --

I spent about 12 hours in my shop adding my upgrades here are this morning results, I will be running tests all day long and over the weekend to see if these hold up

First I am using just 3 modules and a 60,000 uf cap.

Time         Start voltage        end voltage         Cap voltage

8:30 am     2.106 volts             2.256 volts          .562 volts
9:00 am      2.115                    2.256                  .563
9.15 am      2.136                     2.261                  .573
9.45am       2.199                    2.285                   .555
10 am         2.202                     2.290                  .540
10:15 am    2.195                    2.276                   .539
10:30am     2.213                    2.285                    .538

The ending voltage is the voltage after 15 minutes when I disconnect the cap. I short out the cap during that time to restart from  a 0.00 reading of the cap.
The test is now done for 60 seconds not 1 hr or 3600 sec.

The device has always showed a increase in voltage even after running the load.
using  E= 1/2 cv (squared) and dividing by 60 sec. wattage is now .145 watts 
Also these three are now running in series. Adding modules in parallel will increase the wattage.
It's a mystery.
Bill     

E = 1/2 C V**2, here's what I noted:  60,000 uf cap is the same as 60 milliFarads, 60mF,
so we have (taking V on the cap as 0.55V, a rough average):

P = E/t = [1/2 60mF (0.55V)**2]/60 s = 0.15mW = 0.15 MILLIwatts = 150 microwatts.

This is a considerable improvement from the other day, but still below one milliwatt. 

[e2matrix]

I hate to say this Bill but you seem to be stuck in a quantum mili-Loop.  In your thread on the Peltiers you were quoting around 3700 watts.  Actual as was pointed out by a number of sharp eyed members was 3.8 watts.  So you were getting roughly 1/1000th of what you first said.  Now you are saying .145 watts (or 145 milliwatts)  but I'm sorry I have to trust the PhD's calcs on this he's saying 150 microwatts or 0.150 milliwatts which is again 1/1000th of what you said.  The Quantum mili-Loop has you like the Matrix had Neo at the start.      Hopefully you'll escape the QmL. 

[Hope]

Sounds like someone else is a fisherman here.   Gabriel device time.   Just need that steel doughnut now.  This storyline is very familiar and worn out.