Confirming the Delayed Lenz Effect

[Overunityguide]

Hi You All,

Please See my Latest Video About: 'How to Calculate the Delayed Lenz Effect'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ

This Video demonstrates how we can calculate the desired Delayed Lenz Effect, and shows that the experimental results of my previous video about: the Difference between Loading and Shorting the Regenerative Acceleration Generator coil can be explained and can be calculated. So than again high impedance is really important. And the Lenz Delay can be calculated by L/R

With Kind Regards, Overunityguide

[gotoluc]

Hi You All,

Please See my Latest Video About: 'How to Calculate the Delayed Lenz Effect'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ

This Video demonstrates how we can calculate the desired Delayed Lenz Effect, and shows that the experimental results of my previous video about: the Difference between Loading and Shorting the Regenerative Acceleration Generator coil can be explained and can be calculated. So than again high impedance is really important. And the Lenz Delay can be calculated by L/R

With Kind Regards, Overunityguide

Great video and explanation.

So do you think if a generator had a large diameter rotor with 200 magnet we would be able to get the delayed flyback with low Impedance low Resistance generator coils?
Or do you think it is better to go high RPM and less magnets?

Thanks for doing these experiments and sharing.

Luc

[Low-Q]

Hi You All,

Please See my Latest Video About: 'How to Calculate the Delayed Lenz Effect'
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ

This Video demonstrates how we can calculate the desired Delayed Lenz Effect, and shows that the experimental results of my previous video about: the Difference between Loading and Shorting the Regenerative Acceleration Generator coil can be explained and can be calculated. So than again high impedance is really important. And the Lenz Delay can be calculated by L/R

With Kind Regards, Overunityguide

Did you measure the L in the coils, or calculated it from the windings and dimensions?

I have problems with measuring a coil if the internal resistance is too high. The meter is measuring the impedance at normally 1kHz. If the internal resistance is high, it will affect the L-readings to make me believe L is higher than it actually is. This will also affect the calculations of "Tau" the time constant you are refering to in the video.

Just thoughts that might make a difference.

EDIT: If you know at which frequency the inductance is measured at, and you know the internal resistence, you might be able to recalculate the "actual" inductance. I will try that when I get back to work - just to see if my assumptions are correct.

Vidar

[Overunityguide]

Great video and explanation.

So do you think if a generator had a large diameter rotor with 200 magnet we would be able to get the delayed flyback with low Impedance low Resistance generator coils?
Or do you think it is better to go high RPM and less magnets?

Thanks for doing these experiments and sharing.

Luc

@Luc,

Thank you very much.

Personally I think that there can be many different setups in where we can expect the Delayed Lenz Effect to see.
- Very high RPM/Many Rotor Magnets/Medium to Lower Inductance
- Medium RPM/Many Rotor Magnets/Medium to High Inductance
- Medium to Normal RPM/Many Rotor Magnets/High Induction

But for now I think that the last option is the most practicable to experiment with. But what is important, is that you can calculate the proper Delay by the simple formula: L/R and that you include your Load R within it.

With Kind Regards, Overunityguide

Calculate the Delayed Lenz Effect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ

[gotoluc]

@Luc,

Thank you very much.

Personally I think that there can be many different setups in where we can expect the Delayed Lenz Effect to see.
- Very high RPM/Many Rotor Magnets/Medium to Lower Inductance
- Medium RPM/Many Rotor Magnets/Medium to High Inductance
- Medium to Normal RPM/Many Rotor Magnets/High Induction

But for now I think that the last option is the most practicable to experiment with. But what is important, is that you can calculate the proper Delay by the simple formula: L/R and that you include your Load R within it.

With Kind Regards, Overunityguide

Calculate the Delayed Lenz Effect:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QziS_o6gSnQ

Hi Overunityguide,

I believe we would get much better current output if using low Inductance coil as the Resistance is much lower.

As far as I can remember Thane's best results were when he had the most rotor magnets he could fit on his rotor, making his own cores 1/2" x 1/2" (square) using new silicon steel transformer laminations so he would have no short between laminations (very important) and the coil would be wound to minimal Inductance (just enough to get acceleration under load at correct RPM).

Minimal Inductance (wire length) = minimal Resistance = most current output
Non shorting steel laminations = less Eddy currents = less rotor drag = less energy in (prime mover)

As far as I know (at this time) these are the the parameters one needs to fine tune to achieve the most efficient Lenz free and Eddy free generator.

One area that has not been explored yet is using more exotic core materials (other than silicon steel) which may give a boost in inductance so we could further reduce wire length and boost current output.

Another area which also needs to be tested is, how much distance do we need between magnets  I find this one to be very important. Do you think a gap between magnets is needed?

Have you connect a scope to your setup to see what's going on? could you do a video of it?

Thanks for sharing

Luc