How do you make Money from an overunity device that can not be patented?

[Justsomeguy]

So, any Warren Buffet types out there want to own this? any verification process you want, third party, whatever.

[maw2432]

So, any Warren Buffet types out there want to own this? any verification process you want, third party, whatever.

If you are looking for Warren Buffet rich type people you are in the right place.  We are all so rich here that we are just waiting for someone like you to come along with a new discovery so we can make billions more money.  Where can we send our checks?

[lumen]

I think selling plans could work!
You just need to sell them on a web site with a stated end date. Everyone could buy the plans but would not get them until the end date, and you could no longer purchase them after the end date.
Then, after the end date you could determine if you have a sufficient amount of money to release them.
If not, people could select if they want a refund or let it ride to the next end date. Each time the plans are put up for sale the price is also increased. Those who get in early get the best price.

When you finally get enough money to satisfy your goals, the plans are then sent to the registered email of each person.

Of course some proof on your part would be required but the plan is other wise fool proof to guarantee you reach your goal!

[Qwert]

Remember that a patent, like any other goods, must be "sellable", by setting a reasonable price for it. Goods won't have a buyer when you set unreasonable price for it; an inventor will die in indigence after setting too high price. I think the best solution is to sell it on the basis of "royalties".

[WilbyInebriated]

So Wilby you are the "logic police" ?

it appears so, you certainly don't use it...

Please post the mandate that you were granted by Stefan, the forum owner, to act as the logic police authority on this forum.

there is no mandate. i used the words 'logic police' as a colloquial phrase. tu stultus es...

Failure to provide said mandate will by definition mean that you have been self-appointed.

see. here you go off into logical fallacy land again... this time it's ad hominem tu quo que. again, tu stultus es...

Self-appointment to a position of authority is a self-righteous act.

assumption... nor is it a position of authority...  pretty much negates that 'argument' of yours doesn't it... LOL

Presenting yourself as an expert on logic is also a self-righteous act.

where have i said i am an expert? more of your lies...

You fail the very criteria by which you presume to come here and judge others. (Assuming you have no official mandate)

no i don't. pointing out a logical fallacy is not a "judgement" by any stretch of the imagination.

Furthermore, you are selective in your policing...

yes i am... whaaa effing whaaa.

This statement by Justsomeguy is riddled with logical fallacy and assumption... and not a single comment by you pointing this out. You have an agenda Wilby, it is clear for all to see.

incorrect. there were no logical fallacies in that statement. if you disagree point them out specifically and define why they are fallacies... there were some assumptions which is understandable. he was responding to you... in kind. ie: quid pro quo.  he was replying to assumption and conjecture with assumption and conjecture. are you that dense?

You know what my purpose is, to cooperate with the members of this forum in developing technology to make the world a better place for tomorrow's children.

then do that... instead of trying to foist your subjective norms upon justsomeguy who obviously (from their first post) doesn't agree with your subjective norms..

Many people disagree with me but I do not call them troll's, I call you a troll because I believe you are a troll.

you can believe whatever you want... i don't care. i believe you are a mental midget with no grasp on logic or reason... there, we have traded juvenile name calling... can we get back a logical, cogent discussion now? do you know what one is?

And Omnibus is not anything to do with me...

RM