another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[poynt99]

We have used a dual rail of LED's  in series with the battery supply.  In other words they could pick up the power in either direction.  Only one rail lights and it  stays lit continuously during the oscillation phase.

Of course only one LED stays lit, the one pointing to the circuit.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Rosemary,

You've cleverly dodged my question 5 times. Remember, the one about what your implied significance is of the oscillation in the simulations? Nicely done. 

Let's review those dodgy responses:
Your technique is somewhat subtle (but abuntantly obvious), yet effective. How or where did you learn this technique?I asked nicely 5 times, and all 5 times my question was deflected. Clearly you are uncomfortable answering that question

Hi Poynty Point.  Always a pleasure to hear from you.  But ALL THOSE QUESTIONS?  And ALL THOSE SAMPLES? Golly.  You've been busy.  But you left out this one.

I've no idea.  Someone called Poynty Point?  Or is that Poynt.99 RECURRING?  But I've no idea who he is.  Just a talking head - somewhere in Canada - who hides behind an internet personality while he tries to kill off 12 years of hard work - my good name - and any potential advantages in some technology that I'm trying to progress.  And he uses tactics of calumny, traducement, misinformation, misdirection, denial, or anything to hand.  I also know that he's in the process of being sued by a certain John Bedini for similar indulgences of public defamation.  And - in the fullness of time - I hope to manage an action of my own.

LOL

added
Actually I also know that he's now DELETED HIS CALUMNY in the light of this action.  Would that I could be that effective.  But I'll bide my time.  I'm assured that all good things come to those that wait.  And God knows I've been waiting.

Hopefully that explains it.   

Rosie Pose.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

LOL.  Guys,

It seems that ONLY I AM REQUIRED TO BE ACCURATE.  But it's a burden that I'll bear with PLEASURE.  Provided only that this topic is then taken seriously by our manifold TROLLS.  It seems that I must war with full force of their elite army.  LOL.  Would that the odds were better stacked AGAINST me.  That, at least, would present a challenge. 

And as if any further nails would seal the coffin any tighter....

Putting a small capacitor in series with the "positive" FG connection kills all oscillations by blocking the DC current path through the FG.

regarding this last comment.  It's nice to see that TK now acknowledges the fact that the cap simply denies a path for the signal.   But I've covered that in my earlier post.  He seems to have some need to 'repeat' this?  Over and over?  For some reason?  Like the discharge of water from a water pistol.  Continuous but uncomfortably damp.  Anyway.  Moving on.

ETA: I notice that lately Rosie is denying that her oscillations occur when the battery is disconnected. But earlier, when asked about this point, she said something different.

Quoting Rosemary:
Am I allowed to ask which statement is true.... or would that be expressing rampant pseudoskepticism again?

I wonder if someone could explain to TK that there is a 'disconnect' from the battery supply when the switch at the MOSFET Q1 is open.  And by disconnect I only mean that the battery can't deliver a current.  I would have thought that was self-evident.  I think, in retrospect, he's sort of relied on the possibility that our claim ALSO covered the option of the supply being physically out of the system.  LOL.  Who would have thought?  And YET - he's managed to show us that.  I think we should all demand to see the full circuit schematic and some detail as to the parts used.  It's all rather vague.

Kindest regards,
Rosie

By the way (BTW) - it's nice to see the use of adventurous terminologies.  pseudoscepticism.  That's really good.  To the best of my knowledge - I've never even implied this.  If anything it means a 'pretended' disbelief.  And I realise that TK is now acknowledging this.  How refreshingly honest. 

[poynt99]

Hopefully that explains it.   

Explains what?, my question? No it doesn't.

Just like water off a duck there Rosemary. 

Anyway, by not answering, you've still provided an answer.

[Rosemary Ainslie]

Of course only one LED stays lit, the one pointing to the circuit.

Poynty Point.  You say OF COURSE?  That means that your accede that the the current is flowing in both directions through the that rail of LED's notwithstanding their polarity?  Because what I'm telling you is that NOT ONLY does only that one rail light up.  It also STAYS permanently lit.  Even TK's video sample showed evidence of this.  Not sure why you should all find this of so little interest?  But there you go.  One can take the horse to water - but that's about it.

Kindest regards as it's much needed
Rosie Pose.