another small breakthrough on our NERD technology.

[TinselKoala]

What "work" is it that you need to continue? Justifying WITHOUT TESTING your silly circuit and your nonsensical data analysis? Don't let me stop you. There is clearly no need for you to "engage" me, yet you continue to do so by lying about me and misrepresenting my posts.

THERE IS NOTHING I WOULD LIKE MORE THAN TO SEE YOU TEST YOUR CIRCUIT IN PUBLIC IN AN UNAMBIGUOUS MANNER.

So get on with it. I am just about ready to test MY build of your circuit in such a way ... yet again. Do you really want us to swap roles, where YOU get to debunk ME? Good luck, may the better man win.

(Oh, by the way... did you know that Rosemary Ains-lie is really a MAN? This is absolutely true, just as true as her claim that I am humbugger.)

Is 60 degrees Celsius twice as hot as 30 degrees Celsius? I need to know, Rosemary, to calculate the COP of MY circuit. Please TEACH ME and explain your answer.


It's nice that Rosemary thinks that MY circuit, following her published diagram with all values identical or very close, is NOT her circuit. Since I'm using the IRF830a mosfets, she's clearly correct in that assertion-- for as long as I have THOSE mosfets installed. That means if I apply for the OU prize with MY circuit, she won't be able to contest it at all.

So to be clear, let's call my circuit the TAR BABY circuit.... at least until I get my IRFPG50s to replace my mosfets, which should be in a couple of days. (If I've waited fourteen days already, and there are seven days PER week, how many weeks have I waited? Show your work.)

Now.... the TAR BABY circuit can reproduce ALL measurements that Rosemary and her "team" have shown coming from her NERD circuit. I intend to package it up with three 11.1 volt Lithium Polymer batteries so that it will fit within the stated size parameters of this forum's OverUnity Prize.

Does that worry you at all, Rosemary? Remember, I did the same for MyLOW, and Sterling Allen acknowledged that I was the first to replicate Mylow's motor but then refused to give me his award because MY replication, even though it was exact and everybody agreed.... wasn't an overunity device. I am still LOLing over that one....

So you needn't worry.... because as long as there's traffic and you don't threaten Stefan directly with legal issues, he will let you dig your own rabbit hole and go more and more deeply psychotic, right out in public.

Now watch... Rosemary will start saying that I've "admitted" that my circuit isn't the same as hers. But she won't be able to say how, other than the mosfet part number, it is different.


Cue Rosemary, for another insane rant...... in which he will probably claim that he is a woman, after all.... a claim for which there is NO PROOF AT ALL. Anybody can post a video of a crone pointing a camera at a mirror and claim it's them.

[powercat]

Countless questions? From Moi? Surely you jest. Come, let us count them together.

1. She has finally admitted that her calculations of the "25.6 MegaJoules" is incorrect, and she falsely apologised to me, which is worth nothing. What is worth everything is for her to CORRECT her figures, do the calcs correctly, post the correction and most importantly CORRECT THE CONCLUSION resulting from the false calcs. To do otherwise, when the calcs are KNOWN and ADMITTED to be wrong... is a lie.

2. She has claimed that "PER" NEVER indicates a division operation. This has been refuted by me and several others, with copious references, yet she insulted me because of it and has not corrected or retracted her stance nor of course apologised to me.

3. She has claimed that the GREEN TRACE on the Tek scopeshots in her video is NOT the common mosfet drains and has nothing to do with them. I have asked her then to explain just what it is and what it represents and how to interpret it. Is that three or just one question? I count one. She has also insulted me over that issue and has not apologised or corrected her absurdity.

4. She has denigrated my analysis -- or rather, simple explanation -- of her entire scopeshot, without providing any evidence, references or explanations. She has insulted my competence over this issue. I asked, in return for her to explain 4 or 5 items on the trace, clearly and unambiguously. I count that as one question, you may not.

5. She has compared me to Hitler, Mussolini, Savonarola, and the Devil himself, and has even called into question my vertical linear dimension. I have asked her to provide evidence and references for her assertions and claims; she has declined to do so. And yet, I've NEVER even once called her a silly old dried-up skinny titless ex-GILF with false teeth and a diaper... now have I.

6. She claims that several companies have vetted and endorsed her claims. I have asked her to produce ANY EVIDENCE that this has actually happened-- remembering her encounter with Powercat--- and she has failed to do so... for the several years I've been asking that one.

There are one or two other items I'd like her to clear up, but I can't be troubled to recall them right now, I've put in more than a full day's work here today.

Countless questions, or just a few that I keep asking over and over BECAUSE SHE REFUSES TO ANSWER THEM about this open-source, public domain, help-me-to-replicate little project of hers?
Here's where I get to call her a hypocrite, on top of all the other things she is: a willfully ignorant, uneducated, overweeningly arrogant lying hypocrite... who thinks that reading The Dancing Wu Li Masters is equivalent to earning a university degree in physics.

TK
Well done on the new videos,
even if you could get your hands on her own circuit the one that she claims produces excess energy and fully tested it with witnesses and web cams and everything else, she would still deny reality, That her circuit does not work as she claims.

With all these questions that she repeatedly fails to answer it begs the question why is she on this forum ? she already has a blog, not engaging with members questions is only going to results in them being asked again and again.

she keeps referring to (guys) all the time as if they are supportive of her, doesn't sound like these guys are the ones posting here, I wonder who they are ?

[TinselKoala]

Hey, AINS-LIE, how's this for a rabid debunker's offer:

I will allow STEFAN HARTMANN himself, or anybody that he designates as an impartial judge with the necessary knowledge skill and kit, to test MY TAR BABY circuit , with IRFPG50s as well as IRF830as, SIDE BY SIDE with your apparatus, for comparison purposes. I will even pay the shipping for your device, as well as mine, to the designated test location. I, and YOU, will have nothing to say or do with regards to the comparison. And I don't need two "academics" to agree with me. I will accept the result of a SIDE BY SIDE TEST using the same protocols, instruments, and analyses on both our devices, by anybody who can read an oscilloscope trace quantitatively. I don't even care what the protocols are, exactly, as long as they are fairly applied to BOTH of our devices at the same time, side-by-side, and that they have the capability of potentially FALSIFYING your claims and mine -- as any scientific experiment should.

If YOUR Ains-lie NERD device... the exact one sitting in the video demonstration, or a duplicate your team builds --- IF it produces a genuine OVERUNITY result... and MY Tar Baby device does NOT, in side-by-side testing of the tester's choice........ then I will acknowledge your superiority and apologise profusely, and my credibility will be shattered forever. 

IF... however, they BOTH produce an OVERUNITY RESULT.... then I will claim the prize, since my device will fit the parameters of size and weight and YOURS DOES NOT, and since I instigated the testing and you have shown nothing so far. And YOU will reimburse me immediately for my expenses regarding the shipping and etc pertaining to the impartial test.

And if neither yours nor mine is overunity.... you can then continue on to another forum and waste the time of some other honest researchers trying to verify your claims. And again, you will reimburse me immediately, as above, since YOUR device hasn't met its claimed performance -- and since my claim is only that my device behaves the same as yours..... then once again, I am correct and you are not.

And if MY device somehow DOES produce OU in the side-by-side test and yours does NOT.... then you will accuse the tester of being in my pay or thrall somehow. And you will weasel out, claiming it wasn't a fair test after all.

And I will laugh myself silly, once again.


(ETA: I note that he (Ains-lie) has not refuted my assertion that he is really a MAN. Therefore I can conclude that I am proven right on this point. AINS-LIE HAS ADMITTED THAT HE IS A MAN!! You saw it first right here.)

[TinselKoala]

TK
Well done on the new videos,
even if you could get your hands on her own circuit the one that she claims produces excess energy and fully tested it with witnesses and web cams and everything else, she would still deny reality, That her circuit does not work as she claims.

Thank you. I agree with you, there is no way that any circuit test I perform would have any validity in her eyes. That is why I suggested an independent SIDE BY SIDE comparison of our circuits. Of course she will never agree , but if she does, I am quite prepared to go through with my offer.

With all these questions that she repeatedly fails to answer it begs the question why is she on this forum ? she already has a blog, not engaging with members questions is only going to results in them being asked again and again.

She's here because she does have several "supporters" here. WilbyInebriated is her pet troll, and has been critical of a single minor point long superseded in my earlier testing of the COP>17 claim. He's stayed out of this thread, though... maybe he's blocked somehow. And of course the newcomers side with her for a while, until they "DO THE MATH" (tm Rosemary Ains-lie) and discover for themselves that they've stumbled into the psychotic ravings of the certified lunatic Rosemary Ains-lie.
She's (or rather HE's) not answering the questions because HE (Ains-lie) knows that he'd have to admit defeat on each of those minor points. I am stll LOLing over the GREEN TRACE on his scopeshots which he claims is NOT the common mosfet drains, when anybody with functioning eyeballs can see that it is.

And nobody bothers to respond to his silly blog full of nonsense and slander, so to get any kind of rise, like the troll he is, he has to post where there is some dialog happening.

she keeps referring to (guys) all the time as if they are supportive of her, doesn't sound like these guys are the ones posting here, I wonder who they are ?

Nobody. Ains-lie has no support from anybody with any credibility.

NOW... I really wish he would get along and agree with .99 on a test protocol for HIS (Ains-lie's) circuit and start testing. I'm getting tired of his page after page of personal attacks against me and the other people here while avoiding the real issues.

(What? Ainslie is NOT a man? But I'm Humbugger, and shorter than HITLER?     WHAAAT?)

[fuzzytomcat]

Howdy members and guests,

At this point we are going nowhere fast with Rosemary's  unreliable, limited, inaccurate and unwilling to supply any answers for the countless questions from Poynt99, TK, MileHigh and myself, that's been ignored and swept under the carpet buried or to be buried as soon as possible in front of everyone's faces.

I feel we need to talk to the only documented known professional that has some working knowledge of all the Rosemary Ainslie devices from the Quantum 2002 with claims of COP>17 referenced in Rosemary's EIT paper "COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS" to the newest NERD RAT device(s) with claims of COP>INFINITY referenced in Rosemary's paper "EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF A BREACH OF UNITY ON SWITCHED CIRCUIT APPARATUS", from what I've been told Donovan Martin at least has some type of engineering background whom is listed as a author in all the application papers wanting publishing by Rosemary which are listed below.

I do realize that Donovan Martin maybe busy, but it is the utmost importance that he help Rosemary explain all the questions now buried in this thread, and could easily be "BUMPED" back up front in one place to expedite the time process for answers. The fact is we all are busy and have other things to do ..... like make a living to have a place to eat and sleep, but this monumental COP>INFINITY ( COP greater than INFINITY ) claim mess far outweighs just being busy for a few minutes.



Fuzzy

______________________________________________________________________________________________


COUNTER ELECTROMOTIVE FORCE ENABLES OVERUNITY RESULTS IN ELECTRIC SYSTEMS     ( EIT PAPER )
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin       02 February 2009
( EIT_paper.pdf )

OPEN SOURCE EVALUATION OF POWER TRANSIENTS GENERATED TO IMPROVE PERFORMANCE COEFFICIENT OF RESISTIVE HEATING SYSTEMS
R.A Ainslie, H.W Gramm, G.A Lettenmaier, A.Palise, A. Gardiner, D Martin, S. Windisch        01 December 2009
( 23455916-Open-Source-Evaluation-of-Power-Transients-Generated-to-Improve-Performance-Coefficient-of-Resistive-Heating-Systems.pdf )

EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF A BREACH OF UNITY ON SWITCHED CIRCUIT APPARATUS
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron      06 August 2011
( ROSSI-JOP-1-PDF.pdf )

PROPOSED VARIATION TO FARADAY'S LINES OF FORCE TO INCLUDE A MAGNETIC DIPOLE IN IT'S STRUCTURE
Rosemary Ainslie, Donovan Martin, Evan Robinson, Mario Human, Alan Macey, Riaan Theron      06 August 2011
( ROSSI-JOP-2- PDF.pdf )