Testing the TK Tar Baby

[poynt99]

Wow!

[TinselKoala]

Another post full of lies from Ainslie and her sock puppet.

In the first place, I have made my entire, nearly 10 GB database available not only to Mark Dansie, but to anyone else who is interested in this topic. It contains all versions I could find of the Ainslie daft manuscripts, hundreds of her forum and blog postings, all of the screenshots she's posted, her crazy math, her wildly insulting rhetoric, her bad poetry, her videos, and her continuing series of lies and their refutations and much more, like my entire Tar Baby replication.  This entire thread is archived in there as is much of the old "locked' thread, along with my videos which point by point refute the mendacious claims of Rosemary Ainslie. I also include some of my more critical analyses, along with reference material on battery capacity measurement, scope coupling, function generator offset usage and function, power measurement, pulse power measurement and more, from scope and FG manufacturers and IEEE and ASTM and other reliable sources. Much of the refutation of Ainslie's claims comes, in fact, from her own words at various times, and it's all preserved in my database. .99 has a section all to himself with .pdf files and more, showing how Ainslie is mistaken in her claims of overunity performance.
Due to the limitations of my filesharing site I have had to break it up into zipfiles of under 200 MB each and some of them I have not yet uploaded.... but they are and will be here for anyone to see and examine.

http://www.mediafire.com/?b43c5te5tq5xx

The conclusions to be drawn from all of this data are clear and inevitable: Ainslie is a fraud, and a mendacious, vindictive one to boot. Anyone who gets entangled with her does so at their peril... as history has shown. One may simply locate and ask ANY of her "collaborators" like FuzzyTomCat, Harvey, Ashtweth and Aaron, .99 and many others. One may NOT, however, locate any of the co-authors, any of the "vetting" alphabet agencies or their personnel.... because they either refuse to talk about Ainslie or they simply do not exist.

Dear ******,

I had NOT seen that thread.  Have now gone through it in its entirety.  MOST interested in TK's presentations.  My suspicions are that he's rooting through these forums to come up with a viable technology that he, personally, can exploit.  But that's merely a suspicion.  I keep saying it.  WHY would a grown man spend every waking hour over a period of nearly 8 months - on a thread dedicated to trashing my name and our work - if there was any sincere effort in exploring anything at all.  Surely?  If there's nothing in my empty claims - then?  ... Move on.

Because you are engaging in a continuing fraud, that is why. You are attempting to gain monetary prizes for your compendium of lies and bad math. Your miserable tactics and fake research gives a bad name to the whole FE community and you should be ashamed of yourself... but you have neither shame nor conscience nor respect for truth or accuracy. The FIVE different schematics presented for your demonstration device are a case in point, as is your deliberate attempt to cover up the true circuit used, and that is just one single event of many in your history, Ainslie. You are a scourge and you should be severely chastened for it.

Why would he also take the trouble to intervene and PREVENT Mark Dansie from looking at our work?  Surely the trick would be to encourage engagement?  That way Mark would be able to see our claims for the nonsense that TK proposes?

Again, you lie through your toothless mouth. I have NEVER ATTEMPTED TO PREVENT ANYONE FROM EXAMINING ALL YOUR DATA, least of all Mark Dansie.... I've sent him the link to all of your scopeshots, for example... Have YOU? No, of course not because you know what they reveal.... I want everyone who is interested to see ALL of your data, all of the various versions of your daft lying manuscripts, all of your video demo and the protestations that you "did not upload that video"... because when they do it becomes plain to anyone what a lying fool you are, just as you are showing here and now.

WHY does he ALWAYS and EVER recommend that his OWN presentations are taken in preference to ours?  Unless it's to ensure that he's in the fore running of a new technology.  Why does he propose to advance ALL work under his guidance? Except that he's harvesting new ideas. And WHEN has there been any evidence of his promoting any kind of ou anywhere at all?  His posts speak for themselves.  There is NO EVIDENCE ANYWHERE of his own contributions.  Just 'hints' at best.

What a LIAR you are! It's unbelievable that you can be so very mendacious. My very real contributions are all around you and you refuse to see them. You wouldn't understand them anyway, but you could at least DO SOME RESEARCH before you accuse me of your libels. There is plenty of evidence of my very real and solid contributions. Just trying to teach YOU how to read your own oscilloscope has helped many people, both in their own work and to understand what a sheer idiot you are. Function generators not passing current! AC vs DC offset ! You are astounding in your ignorance and your mendacity. Had I never encountered you and someone described you to me, I would not have believed that anyone could be so blithely ignorant, overweeningly arrogant and mendacious all at the same time. You take the cake, truly. You deserve an award all right... .and I know that you will eventually get exactly what you deserve.

Yet he DEMANDS that everyone play their cards so openly?  For his personal edification and inspection?  And his 'ruling' on that device is then to be regarded as ABSOLUTE?   It's laughable.  Absurd.

You are absurd indeed. Yes, I demand that people who claim excess energy play their cards openly, especially when they try to claim prize money or pretend to publish papers. You get no apology from me for that, for sure. For my personal edification and inspection? How about for that of the community instead. And I think you are now confusing me with the Pope of Skeptics, Mark Dansie, who apparently is the only person on Earth who can read a multimeter and give an ABSOLUTE ruling on your absurd "device".

He CLAIMS to be a consultant to some well funded companies looking into eccentric claims. 

Would you care to refute that "CLAIM" with some facts of your own? Of course not, you cannot.

He then talks about how 'WE' funded ... this and that - implying that he's got significant clout.  The guy is a windbag of pure pretension.  He has a tenuous grasp on particle physics - NO idea of chemistry - and he hides his identity from everyone so that he can continue with that DEVIOUS intention to steal ideas and then claim it ALL as his own work.  Unscrupulous is still too tame as a description.

Lie after lie after lie along with continuing libels.  Ainslie, you have no idea of my influence or lack of it, but I can tell you this much: I have been directly responsible for saving my various employers a _lot_ of money that they otherwise might have disbursed to fraudulent claimants. You can believe that or not as you wish... but you cannot disprove it.
I will put my knowledge of chemistry and particle physics up against Ainslie's any day of the week. She dare not engage in a discussion of either of those topics with me because she has neither the education nor the experience nor the WIT to hold her own and cannot even follow the simplest bit of mathematics. She adds 80 + 22 and arrives at 104 !! And the rest of that accusation is libel plain and simple and I sincerely hope that her lawyers will check the database for more egregious acts of libel from this mendacious, overweeningly arrogant Rosemary Ainslie.

In any event.  I've said it before.  It takes courage to 'dance with the devil'.  Was greatly amused at this statement...

First, never NEVER take your working prototype apart for any reason whatsoever.
Second, once you have a working prototype that you think is capable of making free energy or consistent OU performance, _immediately_ construct another identical one, make sure it works, and lock it away somewhere.
Then make a _third_ one and send it to me. If it still works when it gets to me and I take it out of the box, I'll refund your shipping costs.

You don't think that's good advice? You take that statement completely out of context and then you say the following lie:

My personal experience of this Little ploy - is that he then modifies the circuit and then CLAIMS THAT IT IS UNIQUELY HIS OWN.

YOU ARE A LIAR. You cannot provide any evidence for that lying and libellous claim, and not only that but you have no "experience" at all from which to speak.

Just how PREDICTABLE is that?  Hopefully others will be alert.  And this is the BEST.  He dismisses theory in preference to 'saussages'?  Golly.  The guy is either calling for hamburgers, pickles or saussages.  Does he ever think or talk SCIENCE?  EVIDENTLY NOT.

YOU ARE A BOLDFACED, COLORED CRAYON LIAR, AINSLIE, PLAIN AND SIMPLE. YOU KNOW NOTHING OF SCIENCE AND EVEN LESS OF THE TRUTH. YOU CANNOT SUPPORT ANY OF YOUR ALLEGATIONS AGAINST ME WITH REFERENCES AND FACTS. And you do not grasp the reference to "sausages" at all... because you have not done your homework AGAIN, little lady. What are we to do with you. Maybe a special school.... (sound familiar Ainslie? I know more about you than you think I do.)

He's playing you all for fools.  I have NEVER come across a person so entirely bereft of courtesy, decency or integrity.  You will notice that he NOWHERE undertakes to evaluate anything fairly. 

You dirty filthy liar. Over and over again you persist in the same tired and easily refuted lies, and you cannot EVER provide any evidence for those libels against me. Give some evidence for my lack of "fairness". You cannot. You have had plenty of completely fair chances to prove your claims, for instance... and you have failed outright and refused further testing.

Just a ruling according to 'our ickle pickle'.  And you must remember that the ONLY viable technology on OU that is currently being researched is LENR.  Ask him - sometime - what exactly is being done about advancing this subject on overunity.com?  He ACTIVELY engaged to close down that thread as well. 

Lies again, more lies from the liar Ainslie. There is no evidence ANYWHERE of me trying in any way to close down ANY THREAD. In fact I am against such activity because it is censorship. Once again AINSLIE LIES and she cannot provide any support for her lying allegations. "Ickle Pickle"? Once again the incredible troll mentions "Pickles" .... when she clearly knows that the origin of that little meme was in reference to Cheeseburger's male sexual apparatus. Her pornographic delusions continue unabated.

You really need to read between the lines.  His last victim was MrWayne.  There will be many more.  And he seems to think he deserves some kind of approbation for his efforts.  God help us all.

Anyway - enough on such a tedious subject.   I got an apology from Mark as he 'overslept'.  I can understand it.  The guy seems to travel 24.7 - and I expect that takes it toll.  Hopefully I'll hear from him tonight...   

Kindest as ever
Rosie

Victim? Look close, lying Ainslie troll. Mister Wayne _won_ that little battle: it was HIS REQUEST that the thread be closed, and he did it because he could not answer my questions and challenges honestly. Unlike YOU, Ainslie, he seems unable to lie straight out, he just is the master of prevarication and dissimulation. YOU however have no compunctions at all... you simply make stuff up out of whole cloth and trumpet it about as if nobody knew any better. But they do.

[TinselKoala]

@TK
Here is the latest just to get back on topic

"Guys,

I've still not heard back from Mark.  Here's my last email to him...

Mark - this is getting a little bit repetitive.  I've now spent the best part of Sunday as well the most of Monday anticipating a call.  If you do intend reaching me - then let me know.

Here's what we can show you
A variety of different switching circuits that measure COP >1 and COP INFINITY - depending on small circuit variations
That can dissipate varying and/or fixed levels of wattage as required
That results in a battery that outperforms its watt hour rating by upwards of a factor of 6

Here's what we want to discuss with you
The thesis that predicted this result
Which is consistent with the Standard Model
Subject to the eccentric inclusion of a material property in a magnetic field
Some proposed alternatives to the use of a battery supply
Which, in turn would involve research and development and the funding for this
Some development for anti gravitational technologies that are begged in terms of that thesis
That we propose goes some way to explaining LENR an other over unity effects.

Here's what it will cost you
NOTHING
except that development costs will be to your account
And because some of this technology is probably still patentable - the attendant patent costs
But you can probably then enjoy the exclusive benefit of any financial rewards IF you bring this to the market first

In return for
Public acknowledgement and accreditation of our results relating to the switched circuit apparatus and tests
As well as the accreditation of the applied measurement protocols
That relate EXCLUSIVELY to those tests that have already been put in the public domain
Which is required for the accreditation of our papers that open source can further this thesis
And the promising technologies that we contend will result from that increased understanding

Here's what we guarantee
That the measurements will be consistent with tests recorded in ALL our papers
That they are more dependable as our current sensing resistors are now non-inductive and calibrated
That more stringent thermodynamic tests support these claims

Failing which we will REFUND YOU YOUR TRAVEL EXPENSES.

We trust that you have NOT been duped by that absurd thread by your colleague who prefers, for reasons best understood by himself - to be known as Tinsel Koala.  He relies on the poor and comically unscholarly presentation of a series of replications, which he contends discounts these claims of ours - on rather thin and embarrassingly inadequate evidence.  And he seems to have duped the most of those poor members into believing that there is NO significance to any of these claims - notwithstanding his clumsy attempts at replication.

Our measurement protocols have been APPROVED by a number of HIGHLY PROFICIENT ACADEMICS.  We will disclose their identities privately - subject to agreement that they are never to have this association with our tests made public -  except if and when and as they, themselves, require.  On that basis I suspect that you will be able to refer to their expertise.

Surely this is all reason enough to contact me?
Rosemary"

You are libelling me in that letter, if you actually sent it at all. There will be consequences for you, Ainslie. You cannot provide any support for your lying allegations against me, and I will happily present my material to anyone and I can discuss it and demonstrate just exactly where and how you are completely and utterly WRONG in your claims about your "work" as well as in your claims about my analysis of it.
Mark is completely welcome to test and examine my Tar Baby apparatus to see whether or not it duplicates your measurements; he is free to examine all those video presentations of mine WHICH YOU HAVE NEVER SEEN but somehow feel qualified to comment on; and I am ready and able to defend my points in public whenever called upon BY LEGITIMATE INTERESTS to do so. I can't wait to see YOU try to explain the scope shots in your papers to Dansie, or to anyone who knows how to read a scope. You are going to fall flat on your mendacious wrinkled old face.

Witness below: three scopeshots showing a blown mosfet. One of these figures appears in Ainslie's manuscript as "evidence" for her claim. In fact, a mosfet getting +12 volts to its gate either TURNS ON AND PASSES CURRENT.... or it is defective or missing or miswired. Yet we here have three scopeshots (and there are more) that show NO CURRENT in the CVR when the Q1 mosfet is getting  +12 volts to the gate. Ainslie has never explained these shots, she has promised to duplicate them MONTHS AGO as her very first video demonstration of her new testing.... and she has not deigned to do so... because she simply cannot, not with functioning and properly wired mosfets.

[TinselKoala]

Here is what a current trace DOES look like when the mosfet is functioning and turned on by a gate signal. Ironically... and stupidly... Ainslie claims that shots like this show no power coming from the battery .... when in fact they clearly do show current being supplied by the battery to the circuit.

[WilbyInebriated]

the origin of that little meme was in reference to Cheeseburger's male sexual apparatus.

wrong. that was not my intent whatsoever. but go on with your bad ass self and assume whatever you wish...

and i wonder why cheesy never answered my question...