Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of this Forum, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above
Thanks to ALL for your help!!


Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 6 Guests are viewing this topic.

marathonman

 NRamaswami;

when i stated my cores were 1 1/2 inch i was referring to core thickness not length. i miss posted earlier as my Primary cores being 8" but their not their 5" long x 1 1/2 " thick x 1 1/2" wide and Secondaries are 3/4"x 1 1/2"x 5" this makes my Primary cores Twice as big as Secondaries.  with my cores being 1 1/2" wide  this leaves me a window of two inches to play with in Primary coil length. i'm starting at 1 inch but can expand to 2" if i want or need to.
oh i almost forgot my cores are I cores so they can be stacked together like Lego building blocks.(III) easy to add extra power if needed. end core will be C cores but inner cores are all I cores for easy expansion. Remember it's so easy a kid can build it.

dieter

No, no airgaps.  IN was measured like this : AC was separated to 2 dc halfwaves, measured as dc, then reunited to AC, but this can be skipped and AC can be used right away. The 54 ohm resistor is there to limit the supply. There isn't much energy after that 54 Ohm resistor, even when stepped up normaly barely enough to light the LED at all.
The LED is a 5in1 3V 100mA LED (EDIT: can't be, more like 50 mA , 150 mW max).


It was also very interesting to get 49 mA with the shortened, after getting only 8mA with it unloaded/open.


I still try to understand it and yes, it may be a bi-torroid mechanism, reluctance imbalance due to impedance imbalance maybe. A shortend coil may perform recursively in terms of selfinductance...


Regards

a.king21

Dieter, can you modify your circuit like the enclosed diagram
and measure the battery voltage over a period of 1 hour?
It will tell us all we need to know I suspect.

dieter

I don't have a lead battery and the output voltage of this setup is not good to charge a car battery. I seem to observe better efficiency after a 54 ohm resistor than after only 27 ohm (79mA, yet got to do the math precisely), so the saruration may be reached quickly in such a small scale setup.


I'd be glad if some of you try it, since my meters are simple.


I will however try to run it at higher voltages to get about 15 Volts output and then add my inverter. Something like in series with some lightbulbs attached to mains.


BTW. you can use your figuera coils, just connect them "reversely". That's what I did. No gaps tho.


As I said, i did the measurement with greatest care, within my possibilities, which are limited and that's where you come in. I have to say, from all the setups with various cores and coils that I have made recently, some of them with great effort, this is clearly the most efficient.


Regards

verpies

Quote from: dieter on March 22, 2014, 07:14:43 PM
I connected the middle coil to the 2 halfwave pulses, virtually reunited them to AC. So this was now the primary. Then I connected a rectifier, a LED and the voltmeter to the right coil.
That means that the input waveform was PDC, not pure DC.

Quote from: dieter on March 22, 2014, 07:14:43 PM
Then out of boredom I short circuited the left coil, and bang! 2.67VDC at 49.3mA !!!
...
Out: 0.131 Watt
Your output power calculation is wrong because for a PDC waveform, the calculation 2.67V * 49.3mA = 0.131W is invalid.
That calculation is valid only for pure DC.
It is invalid for PDC and AC.

Also, it is not surprising that shorting the left winding increases the flux variations in the right winding, because magnetic flux is expelled from under any shorted windings and since half of the flux cannot go through the left leg of the core anymore, then it must go through the right leg of the core....inducting more dΦ/dt there.