Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Doug1]

From Hannon
"Quoting another pragraph from the patent from 1914 (Buforn) with some cryptic sentences:



"The way to collect this current is so easy that it almost seems excused to explain it,
because we will just have to interpose between each pair of electromagnets N and S,
which we call inducers, another electromagnet, which we call induced, properly placed
so that either both opposite sides of its core will be into hollows in the corresponding
inducers and in contact with their respective cores, or either, being close the induced
and inducer and in contact by their poles, but in no case it has to be any communication
between the induced wire and the inducer wire."




Why did he make reference to two cases: 1- when there is contact between the induced and inducers cores and,  2- when they are close together and in contact by their poles ? Which is the difference between contacting through the cores and contacting through the poles?


Why did he mention that "in no case it has to be any communication between the induced wire and the inducer wire" ? At first sight it seems to be a redundant feature, does it?


Please comment your thoughts about these sentences. I am not able to understand their real meaning. I do not understand why Buforn emphatize those details.

My response
   Because the method of induction is normal and not where the secrete is. It is only helpful to have a very good and strong electromagnet to have a very strong output. That in itself will only produce a big transformer of some form.It will not result in building a closed system where the useful effects of a magnetic field in motion are not destroyed.

[NRamaswami]

Hanon,Doug1:

Both of you have the patent text of the last Buforn patent. That is the only patent that discloses the best method of operating the device. We have seen that the straight pole is the best mode and not the 7 cores connected in series..Both of you will not send me the translated text. I do not read spanish. I know how to read patent text..What can I do?

This patent was drafted 100 years back..Still it is not enabling people to replicate it. See how cleverly it was drafted.

This does not give what the poles are and I tested and identified it as opposite poles.

This does not give the method of winding the coils..This also I tested and found out. This has confused all of you and all have claimed that identical poles must be placed in view CW and CCW windings until I pointed out.

There is only one secret...

This patent shows three coils..

An input coil..

An output coil

A feed back coil in phase with the primary.

The secret is that the winding pattern of Primary coils is not disclosed. If it is a multifilar coil as the number of coils increase the inductive impedance increases so much it will not allow the current to flow through but the multiple rotating currents will create many magnetic waves one aidng the other and will create a very strong magnetic field inspite of the low input.  As lot of iron is used and the electromagnet in whatever geometrical form you wind it tends to focus the magnetic force in the center. Therefore once you determine what is the amount that the primary will consume, the feedback coil must provide only that or slightly above that for giving the feedback.

The super duper complex commutator is a diversionary tactics employed to hide the simple secret. I very quickly found that the commutator and the resistor array are redundant. You use the multifilar primary and the proper feedback backed up by a voltage limiting MOV (metal oxide varistor) and a fuse to blow the fuse away to prevent the runaway current, then you have an electromagnet that is continuously oscillated. Such an electromagnet will continuously produce the output current.

Counter emf will be present but is negated by the use of winding pattern and placing the coil within the cores or within the poles. Think about it..If the coil is placed inside the core one side of the coil is one pole of magnet and the other side of the coil is opposite pole. You have to connect the end of the feedback coil to the beginning of input coil and begiinng of feedback coil to the end of the input coil. Then wind an outside coil between two earth points and give it current once and the feeding current is removed and the iron is continuously oscillated.. Nothing more..You can take energy from any point on earth.

I'm warned that this method is known to many people but this method is dangerous because it taps energy directly from air and this can create a rush of energy to the system and this can result in lightening strikes on the system and lightening prefers living beings than inert material and so this method should not be employed. I'm also told told that many people have been killed attempting to do this. So the preferred method is to use the electronics method of using a battery and an inverter and then charging them.

Just think about it..

what is a permanent magnet.. You give dc current once to iron it becomes permanent magnet and remains a permanent magnet for supposedly 400 years. In practice I have seen it slowly reduce in magnetic intensity. Probably we gave less currrent.

What is an electromagnet..iron oscillated by AC or pulsed DC..Nothing more..If you can keep this oscillation continuous then you have continuous output. There is nothing else. No secrets. It is a very simple thing. How to keep the electromagnet always oscillated. Then you have a continuous production of electricity. 

[TruthHunter]

The comment has been made that the Figuera device is likely massive. However, he traveled with it for exhibition so this seems
to put an upper limit on the size. Also, it seems that news articles might have commented on the size if it were significantly larger than
standard dynamos.

[tak22]

So the small Y magnets are fixed and motionless and composed of several reels or coils.

What is the length of one reel. 305 Meters or 1000 feet. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reel

Electromagnets: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnet

If small Y electromagnets are composed of several reels of coils what about the large Inductor electromagnets?

With respect, I don't think the generic word 'reel' has any more significance than 'coil' does in relation to the overall 'size' of the intended device. I think it's just another descriptor variation to convey an image.

If you want to see the effect on a table, a small table top device is enough.

Yes! That's all most people are interested in doing, creating a small proof of concept replication, and a small device is easier to improve upon as changes are easier to make and the results are easier to see, plus it's safer!

[NRamaswami]

Tak 22:

Thanks for your post..

It cost me $20000 in my personal funds and very signficiant time to learn this and do this. I'm not interested in spending my money, my time, my expertise gained with considerable effort who would comment or think. Do it yourself if that is what is interesting to you. Thank you for your understanding and wish you Success