Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 19 Guests are viewing this topic.

antijon

For everyone's entertainment, I've republished a video that I recorded Oct. 14 of 2014. I had deleted my youtube videos in hopes of updating the info, to make it more clear and concise, but it seems relevant to repost it now.

https://youtu.be/ScTHwo-Jaq4 Haha, I was probably drinking at the time. Anyway, I replaced the commutator and resistor with a sliding resistor. The effect is the same. The poles are same polarity, facing each other. If you can take anything from this video, see that it proved the validity of Hanon's original interpretation, which he published here: https://youtu.be/ZPbWoaPUE5s . Bare in mind the date, Oct. 6, 2014.

Now, for those of us in this forum, newcomers and all, you may be learning these things for the first time, but that doesn't give you the right to claim conception here. I'm not going to sit quietly and watch the rug get pulled out from under someone, while someone else tramps around saying, "my idea, my idea." Give credit where credit is due. Otherwise, shut your fairy-loving pie hole.


hanon

Come on guys! This is a serious thread. Marathon, please modify your last post. The only thing that you will get with such kind of posts is to avoid some MIB coming to this circus.


Now that the audience is quite high I post some doubts that I have:


1- I got stucked builing a commutator.  I am thinking of restarting my tests. But as I am not very expert in mechanizing objects nor I have a workshop I need to build the easiest commutator possible. Please tell me if the ideas in this post are fine to get the two opposite magnetic fields: [size=78%]http://overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/msg467058/#msg467058[/size]


2- As the 1908 patent already uses two variable signals I do not understand why we still need to adjust the distance of the coils as Marathonman is suggesting


3- If we just want to replicate a static dynamo, then why is marathonman suggesting no to use external yokes to close the magnetic circuit or just to arrange the coils so that the expelled lines of force may go back by a path of low reluctance




As the secret benefactor prefers to keep in the dark I suppose that he won´t answers to these doubts, so please marathonman if you are so kind..


Regards


marathonman

Hanon;

antijon had almost got it.  Quote "Are you also under the impression that the resistor reduces the reactance of the inducer coils?"

Hanon had almost got it right.  Quote "or just to arrange the coils so that the expelled lines of force may go back by a path of low reluctance"

the reluctance of the longest path through the two cores will add to the distance through the air as it returns to the opposite side of the single magnet completing the path for one of the inducer magnets. The distance adds to the reluctance decreasing the amount of difference in terms of current change.
so no external yoke hanon.

there is a small adjustment to fine tum the cores to one another depending on core size, electromagnet size and currant....ect

digitalindustry

Quote from: antijon on December 21, 2015, 11:37:56 AM
Are you also under the impression that the resistor reduces the reactance of the inducer coils?

Looking forward to it. Care to share your setup now?

There's many ways to fulfill Faraday's BxV, which is what I've always been interested in. For instance, in Figuera's generator, B (flux density) increases when input current increases, just like a normal transformer. But due to the effect of two inducers acting with proper phasing, the coil now appears to be "moving" between two magnets. Like in the image below. BTW, have you ever seen those cheeky little shake-to-charge flashlights? They used a single magnet moving up and down in a coil... you know the output would be twice as high if they used this arrangement.

Speaking of flux density, I don't suppose you read my posts about parallel primaries, or parallel inductors?

nope i didn't read your post i will find it after posting this -

i am always happy to share:

There are two basic designs:

First is a Pyramid

and this is my own idea/design

- take a pyramid of the general proportions attached. (any ratio of that proportion)
-make out of copper tubing
- from dead center top drop a copper wire/tube and here is were the 'capacitor' will sit.
- the 'Cap' should sit also 50% down from the top of the pyramid to the base.
- the 'capacitor' is built by 3 plates (willl experiment with copper or conductive metal)
- the center plate i will experiment with 'earthing' down to the base of the pyramid
- left and right of the center will be a dilaletric material i.e i was going to use thin piece of vinyl
- then left and right of that a 2x strip of bismuth so 1x left 1x right
- another set of dialectic (vinyl) left and right of the Bismuth
- then the two outer plates.

- the two outer plates will be attached at the bottom with a wire/tube down to two inductors.

- these two inductors will then patch off the wire to the fluctuation 'energy' i.e the two output wires.

- i will drill the whole 'capacitor' in such a way that from the right and left at a 90degree angle i can have two (2) Perm Mags approaching the  two outer plates. (and make it in a way that they are adjustable)

- the adjusters should not be made out of any conductive material i.e the Perm Mags have to be air gap adjustable and not 'conductivity' attached to the outer plates.  (also the integrity of the capacitor) i.e if you drill the cap through the center to run an 'adjustable rod' it should not be conductive 

and experiment from there.

Second one was given to me just recently by some non human friends of mine
it is a magnetic motor and when i saw it i thought it was so simple that i didn't believe it.  (not that they have reason to lie to me ha ha)

so i won't talk about it until i build it.

i have no problem to build and post them here - the people i have a relationship with more or less run and own the meatpuppets on these many sites thee real MIB are men in 'white' and they are currently running this planet.

we are coming to arrangements to make changes in the configuration of the planet to try to help people but there maybe some 'bumps' along the way.

so strap in.

: D

edit* fixed unclear parts

variation in experiment would be as follows:

- use one perm mag instead of two
- eventually use a ball/sphere of bismuth and perhaps center it and build the outer plates as spheres around it- (still insulated with the dialetric)