Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[antijon]

Okay, well I have an inductance meter now, and i ran some tests i thought I would share.

First, regarding Ramaswami's setup. Using a Tesla bifilar coil as a primary (of a transformer) serves to increase the coil's capacitance. Referring to Tesla's patent, https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/patents/us-patent-512340-coil-electro-magnets , he describes the purpose of the coil, and also other means of reducing inductive reactance.

As we know, a transformer has high inductive reactance when the secondary is open. Adding a load reduces the primary's reactance and increases current draw. Shorting the secondary cancels the reactance, and the primary draws max current, only limited by it's DC resistance.

So, in this case, my question was, will the secondary coil's EMF change between normal transformer arrangement and an arrangement where the primary coil's reactance is negated?

If you have an inductance meter, you can use an online reactance calculator to determine the reactance at line frequency for a primary coil.
In my setup, I had a 1:1 ratio transformer, and the primary's inductance was 213mH with a reactance (impedance) of 81 Ohm at 60HZ.

To cancel the inductive reactance, I used a capacitive reactance calculator to find an impedance of 80 Ohm at 60HZ with a 33mfd. capacitor.

So, the two reactances cancel, for the most part, and the current is only limited by the DC resistance of the coil.

In testing, I proved this by checking for current and a magnetic field when the secondary was not loaded. So, results were, when loaded, the EMF is the same whether it's wired like a normal transformer, or with a capacitance to cancel reactance.

In my book, this proves to me that, yes, you can cancel the reactance of a primary coil, but that will not change the EMF, and thus the power out will be the same as if it were a normal transformer. I have also tested dual primary transformers, similar to Ramaswami's setup, and in my findings, with normal AC, and both coils in phase, the output EMF doesn't change. Here, also, the EMF and power out is related to power in, and should never be more than 100%.

For Darediamond and Ramaswami: Tesla also states in his patent that increasing the voltage will also reduce inductive reactance. In any way, reducing reactance is great for electromagnets, because any reactance limits magnetic strength. In transformers, however, it makes no difference.

Figuera's generator is different than a normal AC transformer, and I hope this helps clear up and de-mystify some of the things involved. Using bifilar coils may aid a Figuera setup (by reducing reactance), but it's his current divider that makes it more than a normal transformer and increases EMF.

[NRamaswami]

Antijon:

I do not understand much of the technical stuff you have written. All I can tell you simply is this. Please increase the number of filars from bifilar to 12 to 14filars. See what happens. In AC..See what is the current drawn and what is the magnetic field strength. What is the wire type that you used? Did you use thinner wires for primary and thicker wires for secondary and did you have sufficient number of secondary turns to increase the voltage.

A Multifilar coil is different from a bifilar coil. The impedance or resistance keeps increasing enormously with the increase in the number of filars and you have very little current draw in AC but a very powerful magnetic field is created.

We do not really need info on Tesla and what his patents suggest. Why? Much of his published literature is in line with theory and those that are against have been confiscated and remain state secrets to this day. To me Tesla is an experimenter who made his observations. We also need to make experiment and make observations. Nothing more. Nothing less. Since you have all the meters why don't you check if the 12filar coil arrangement reduces current draw but increases magnetic field strength..

Also did you use the Earth batteries as I suggested? New ones

If the current is given to move in series it will not produce COP>1 without the Earth batteries. If the current is given in parallel maintaining the same polarity it will increase the voltage experienced in the secondary in the middle 4 times and if the powerful magnetic field is compressed and magnetic saturation attained in the secondary core  you get the cop>1 results. If you connect to Earth batteries it is automatic.

Unfortunately it is against theory and so you conveniently limit yourself to the theoretical model and restrict yourself to bifilar as disclosed by Tesla. What prevents us from moving one step more and doing it friend? And you are coming immediately to conclusions..

Electromagnets do not behave in the way anticipated. We need to test and find out how they behave. The essential point of the Figuera device is the shape. and the fact that he used two primaries with secondary in the middle. as a module and used several modules and sent current in the opposite sides so the two primaries will have different magnetic field strength always.  I do not understand why he did it for I have not experimented with all 8 cores. Could not afford them.

You please check with a 12 or 14 filar coil and then give us your insight..What is the input and what is the magnetic field strength and what is the amount of current that would be needed in a single helical coil or bifilar coil to produce the same strength. As I have tested even a trifilar coil is capable of drawing a lot of current and only when we go above the 8 filars the current draw starts diminishing.

Do not limit yourself to bifilar. Do not use old data..Old patents..Progress in every other field has been achieved except electricity and magnetism and it is only for one thing to maintain the status quo of rich countries as rich countries and poor countries as poor countries. Not for long..

[marathonman]

  i have been testing 3.2 inch primaries with Quad Filler 640 turns plus and had great results and with only 100 v 1 amp.
but i must remind you that all currant can be controlled out side of the primaries so worrying about ohm's should not be an issue as that will be controlled by your resistor setup. i don't have to worry because with my mag amp setup,  the control coil resistor tap will take care of all that leaving the power side alone to do what it does best. using 12 volt at milliamps doesn't waist a whole lot of power on the control side.

i don't understand why someone would wan't to waste their money on so much wire when it was totally unnecessary.
i am really surprised the core didn't melt in front of you.

you did get the Dogma old data right. all the books of today are filled with Dogma status Quo crap that is designed to rob you of any over unity and waste your precious Electricity. do your own research just like the Great Pioneering Men before you did before the age of the gutless high forehead Scientist that hide behind a 600 line Dogma Quack Equation. this is why Tesla was so dangerous to the status Quo because he didn't play their gutless game.

Hell J P Morgan paid Heaviside, Lorentz and god knows who else to doctor up Maxwell's 20 plus original free energy equations and even had school books replaced to cover it up,  literally wiped all references pertaining to them.  even  Einstein was paid by him to lye.  because of this greedy man the world has suffered to no end.

the key to the universe is Electricity and Magnetism,  it is what makes the heaven's move. so when one master's the key's the rest is of no consequence.

[Doug1]

similar to Ramaswami's setup, and in my findings, with normal AC, and both coils in phase, the output EMF doesn't change. Here, also, the EMF and power out is related to power in, and should never be more than 100%.

  What?

[antijon]

Doug, I was referring to a dual primary transformer. Ramaswami showed some photos before and he had two primaries on either side of his secondary, just like Figuera's.

You can add as many primaries as you want, but if they are powered by the same AC source, wired in parallel, the output voltage won't change.

So, if I have windings of 1:1 ratio, 12V source- turn on one primary, output is 12V. Turn on second primary, output is still 12V. Twice the current on the primary side, but EMF doesn't change. I learned this by experiment.


And Ramaswami, if you don't understand my technical jargon then I apologize. I don't have formal schooling in this but I try to learn on my own. And for whatever "theory" you are referring to, perhaps we should also forget about Faraday's law, or Ohm's law, or Ampere's law... it seems they also include theories.