Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

For deep study:

I think I have discovered a new configuration which may get OU finally. I want to share with you that in a configuration with like poles facing each other the induced magnetic field will not act against the inducer field (as usual) but it seems to reinforce the inducer field in the electromagnet which is increasing in strenght at that moment. In other words: the induction take place to ASSIST the inducer field, not to reduce it, as usually happens in the Lenz effect.

The important idea is to note that induction can take place as consecuence of two different phenomena:

1- Induction by flux cutting the induced wire: This induction is done by the lines of field cutting the wires. This motional emf usually creates a dragging force which acts against the movement. As this is a motionless device there won´t be any dragging force.

E_cut = B·v·Length·sin(Theta)

2- Induction by flux linking two coils: This induction is done by the flux linking two coils. This induction does not need to cut the wires (as happens in transformers). It will create a induced magnetic field that will tend to oppose to the change in the inducer field.

E_link = A·dB/dt

In order to emulate a movable generator into a motionless device it is necessary that the magnetic flux lines cut the induced wires. Therefore we should maximize the induction by flux cutting and minimize the induction by flux linking.

Like poles facing each other: By changing the magnetic strength in both electromagnets (excited with the two opposite signals) the lines of force will repel and will leave the induction iron core. The sequential change in both currents will create a swing of the lines of force back and forth in each cycle, cutting the induced wires which surround the induced core.

The features that will require this configuration are:

Feature 1. Two north poles facing each other N-N in the electromagnets: With this set-up the magnetic field lines will leave the core inside-out. (Maybe two south poles will also work fine. I have just studied the N-N configuration)

Feature 2. Excite with two opposite signals each electromagnet . It will achieve a  relative movement of the flux lines cutting the wire back and forth along the whole coil length from side (pole) to side (pole) (that we will name as coil thickness). One magnetic field is increasing and other magnetic field is decreasing, therefore no change in magnetic pressure between them will be created during this swinging motion.

Feature 3. A rectangular shape in the electromagnets an in the induced coil in order to maximize the flux cutting induction and minimize the flux linking induction. The ratio of both effects will be increased with high values of the induced core perimeter and low values of coil area. This is a new feature which is fundamental for a optimized induction.

( E_cut / E_link ) = ( Coil_Perimeter · Coil_thickness) / Coil_Area

Note that the flux linking induction is produced in the part of the coil linked by the inducer flux lines. This induction will produce a counter induced field (as usual). Therefore it is needed to minimize this flux linking effect. We need a ratio E_cut/E_link > 1  because the induction by flux cutting will be the one that won´t produce an opposite Lenz effect because this is a motionless device.


Feature 4. As the flux cutting induction just happens in the zone where the lines are expelled from the core then we need that each turn will be cut during all the time. Therefore, it will be better to wind the induced coil with a tape instead of a wire (the tape must cover the whole coil thickness from side to side). With a tape all the turns will be cut all the time by the flux lines coming out the core. This will not happen with common wires. Tape winding will maximize the flux cutting induction and will minimize the induction by flux linking. I think that tape winding is mandatory for achieving a ratio well over 1.

Conclusion: With this new features I think that this generator will be able to get a much higher induced current than the current used to excite the device. The Lenz effect in this configuration will reinforce (assist) the inducer field which is increasing at that moment in the corresponding electromagnet. This configuration will get the Lenz effect working to make a stronger field instead of making a weaker field, as normally happens.

Please share your comments and ideas, and tell me if I have made any mistake in this reasoning.

Regards,

Hanon


ANNEX  -  Equations


E_cut= B·v·Length = B·v·N·Coil_perimeter

v=Space/Time = Coil_Thickness/(1/2·Period)= Coil_Thickness·2·Frequency

B=B1+B2 = constant =Bmax

Frequency =1 / Period

E_cut= Bmax·Coil_Thickness·2·Frequency·N·Coil_perimeter
--------------

E_link =N·Area·dB/dt

dB/dt =(Bmax - Bmin)/(1/2·Period) = Bmax·2·Frequency

E_link =Bmax·2·Frequency·Area·N
---------------

E_total =E_cut - E_link = Bmax·2·Frequency·N·(Coil_Thickness·Coil_Perimeter - Area)

[Doug1]

Now your getting somewhere Hanon. The tesla version uses ac.

[Doug1]

Side note,your second page showing the signal of the two inducers, some people will only view it from the output of the induced. IE the signals are in reality above the zero line from the view of current but sinusodal from the aspect of effect on the induced. Good luck trying to keep that straight in any conversation.

[Schiko]

@hanon

Only one question.
What is the phase of the input signals?
If it is 90 degrees in the machine Figuera, does not work. Try to see.
If it is 180 degrees, nothing changes. It is exactly the operation of the machine Figuera.
If 0 degrees, how do you propose will create a standing wave, you will have a gain, while the system is tuned but with a nonlinear load will not work very well. 
My question is, how do you go the junction of overlapping fields (> | <) to move from one side to another?
See, my question is for Figuera 1908 machine, and not to other patents. Before that, "Tesla's experts" appear explaining details.   

Merry Christmas

[hanon]

Hi,

The key is not thinking of phase... nor in creating standing waves... Both signals must operate in counterforce, when one increases the other decreases and the reverse, when the second increases the first decreases in magnetic strength. Make a test, join your palms and put then in front of you, now push more with the right one and less with the left one. The contact point should have moved to one side. Now make the opposite, push more with the left palm and less with the right one.

As you should note you are swinging your palms from one side to the other with very few effort if you do it rhythmically. The device works the same but with magnetic strength in each electromagnets to move the point where the lines of field are expelled from the core.

Both signals must be in opposition, and as remarked by Doug they must be always positive to avoid switching the poles.

Regards and merry Christmas !!