Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Schiko]

Hi,

The key is not thinking of phase... nor in creating standing waves...

If I can't think of "phase", in which I'm going to think?
We're talking about physics and electronics here, no?
The 1908 machine, is an induction machine, right?
She has the behavior of a transformer, right?
She needs the induced field varies in order to work, right?
For the induced field vary he needs the electrical current varies, right?
If the electrical current varies, she creates a wave, right?
This wave at any given instant in time, has a "phase", right? or am I wrong? 

Regards!

[hanon]

Some aclarations about the pole orientation and the rectangular shape:

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/12439-re-inventing-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-24.html#post247198

Regards

[Doug1]

The internet is not the easiest way to communicate is it.lol
Here is a drawn trace of all three coils in time. Im not a big fan of scopes hard to use a two dimensional image of three dimensional activity. This sort of what your looking for.

[Doug1]

The advantage is in the method of using the current to make a strong field and not asking the field to reverse polarity.Only to reduce in strength. There is only one source current which is shared by two inducers. Each inducer is controlled in two ways.The amount of current going to it and the time.

Tesla's model is doing the same thing with the source being ac.

What makes a electro magnet stronger? More wire turns,more current,better material. Current costs money for ever.More you use and or the longer you use it the more you pay. More current is not a good way to make a stronger magnet.
  The number of turns of wire results in a longer wire with higher losses. Who told you to use one wire? If they ment to say a longer wire or that length of wire was important part they would have come out and said that plain as day. What it says is more turns "N". More copper cost more money to but only once. When you have a long length of wire and it laps back and forth don't you expect the field around each wire to continue to act as it should? There are a lot of things I don't understand but i dont think going the opposite direction of what I want to go in will get me to a place very soon.
  Take a look at some battery operated lift magnets. Up to 11,000 lbs from a 12 volt battery. you have to scroll down the page to find the spec sheet. Now if you had two of these facing each other with a induction coil between them and rotated the current form one to the other and back so one is getting a little voltage say 3 or 4 volts while the other is at 8volt and smoothly reduce the 8 volt one while increasing the the lower one the point between the fields would shift back and forth. The flux of each pushing against the other the entire time. The two separate flux paths being opposing have a total potential difference of a single magnet being on at a full 12v at all times. The induced coil will react as if you were cutting the lines with rotation in a magnetic field that has 11,000 pounds of lift. while less practical and expensive to use two of these this way it's just to give you the image in your head hopefully. Subdividing this into several smaller magnets enables the induced coils to be wired up in series to reach a useful voltage.
A wave yes, a cyclic wave no. Reversing magnetic domains wastes too much energy. Can you imagine getting your fingers between two of those magnets set up to attract each other? That would be a bad day.

[hanon]

Thanks Doug for your comment and sketch. Your analogy with two strong electromagnets is very interesting: how a 12 V battery may lift heavy weights. I still don´t get why you say to use more turns "N"  not in a conventional way. Are you refering to a torus electromagnet? Anyway, maybe it is a just a optimization. By now I would be happy in having a working unit. Optimization will come later.

I have here another picture for Schiko in order to explain how the two opposite signals are.

Note that it is important to change the field intensity but you don´t need to reverse polarity. Maybe even it is mandatory to avoid reversing polarity, I am not sure. Therefore the opposite signals must be always above zero voltage.

Regards and merry Christmas!!