Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

Started by bajac, October 07, 2012, 06:21:28 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 88 Guests are viewing this topic.

dieter

Hi Hanon.


When the poles left and right to Y are N and S, then it is indeed just a simple induction transformer. Figuera clearly stated that this is not the case. The imaginary fieldlines of a magnetized coil assemble a torroid, a core may concentrate it in the center. Nonetheless, at the end of the core the field lines exit the core in the center, turn around and go to the other pole on the outside. The magnetical field on the poles is therefor characteristicly strong.  In my Idea, facing the two inducers N to N, the same number of field lines are still present, but they are forced to be compressed on a 2D area. Each line must circle in it's own torroid, no matter how strong the compression is. The result is a high field strenght of ns-sn in a small area.  oscillating this area between the left and right side of Y will reverse the polarity of Y, with only little field strenght variations on the two inducers, but maintain the high, compressed field strenght in Y.


A really nice theory IMHO, but to be fair, it just didn't work. I just made a very small scale test, and I used simple alternating 2 dc pulses. Even tho the coils oscillate as the are supposed to, I get absolutely nothing on the pancake, null, nil, nada, not a Millivolt! Which is really strange.


Anyway I don't give this theory up so quickly, unless somebody's going to explain me where my mistake is.


First I will check the pancake coil, maybe it has a short cirquit. Also my cores may be not usefull, as they are steel spheres right now and the may focusize the fields to some random spots.


NRamaswami

Hi Dieter:

Please check if you made two different primaries or wound the same wire around both the primaries. Then the magnetism itself would be gone in the primaries. Please check if magnetism is present or not. That is an important thing to first check. If magnetism is not present, no magnetic induction would happen. You need to have two different primaries for your concept to work. Each must be a separate solenoid on its own. Not a single wire.

Let me know if you made this mistake. If not then the NS-NS-SN thing does not work.

marathonman

NRamaswami you know you can use a computer power supply to get the amperage you need. my power supply will handle up to 50 amps @ 12 volts. buying a 20 a variac will rip the pocket book to shreds.  you can also use a step up transformer to what ever desired test voltage you want or need, besides the fact you could take wall AC mains through bridge rectifier if need be. as for the doubt as the secondaries being less turns, you have to remember that the sum of each coil output is added as per coil count i.e. secondary 60 volts x 20a x 7 coil outputs = 420 volts x 20A  or what ever combo you need just like a series battery in your flash light. in my case i have 8 coil pairs x 60 = 480 volts at 20 to 30 A. my goal is to run 480 to a transformer to supply house with 220/ 110 or there of. i don't have all my core material yet so i am at a standstill. see  in USA all corporate are thugs and when they find out you are building free energy devise they tend to go sour or charge out the ass. i plan on using 4 mil high Z for my 800 hz DC unit and 11 mil high Z for 60 hz AC unit after i get it perfected. the DC unit is AC ran through bridge rectifier for transportation purposes. i have designed and built  timing boards and They work perfect i am also using a 300 watt vitreous wound adjustable resistor NTEWA series for my 7 middle taps 9 all together counting end taps. i am using MJ11032's for my transistors and if i use higher voltages i will use ESM3030DV power module from ST micro. good luck all....happy Figuering ! P.S. i have also designed a 0 draw solar alarm system for shed or stand alone building and a Board for a Tesla Ion Generator but these are another Story or forum.

NRamaswami

Hi Marathonman:

Thanks for the kind words.. I'm really a dummy and so do not understand much of it. The only person who can handle transistors and soldering had got sick from soldering and he is no longer willing to do this. The other person who worked for me and who knows the subject is no more. So I do not have any knowledge of Electronics. I have used 50 volts and 16 amps transformers and they are not effective. I have also used 12 volts and 16 amps transformers and they are not effecctive. Only when we have Voltage greater than amperage combination we see real results. In fact that should not happen and powerful magnets when they are vibrating must produce powerful secondaries.  I have an idea as to how Figuera did this and let me check that..I'm short of cash at the moment and we will perform that and come back to you. In India you get every thing for a price. But my understanding is that in US every thing is hyped up and so costly. With this Internet era, we have communications so advanced, information so wide spread, every client bombs me and I need to keep sending and receiving and performing all at the same time. I think I have figured out this device and let me wait and test and then come back to you all.

We will test the N-S-N or S-N-S test tomorrow but I'm very doubtful it would work. Let us wait and see.


dieter

@NRamaswami
Yes, I checked their magnetism and also polarity. This is done with a small neodym in my hand, I then clearly feel attraction, repulsion, or the ac vibration. I think my mistake was a completely wrong ratio of dimensions: the effective area of the pancake simply had not enough mass to move a significant charge separation. I'll build it again, with better proportions, closer to the patent drawings.


In the patent there are 2 Y coils. As described in the patent, the primary voltage or pulses alternate in polarity. The 2nd primary coil is 90 degree out of phase, so the flux in both Y never comes to rest. Also, as the polarity in one intuctor alternates with every pulse, this allows the back emf of the coil to add to the next pulse.
So, this "stereo" design may work much better than a straight set of 3 cores/coils.
I have made an interesting observation: I sticked 2 Neodymium magnets together N to N. Then I moved this N-N Area trough a coil. Not only did I reach higher voltages than with the end pole of 2 magnets in nsns constellation, I also had to move the magnet over a shorter distance. The lorentz force although, was stronger, so lenz not violated yet.
I will make tests with the magnet monitoring foil to see how much energy is required to move the compressed N-N Domainbarrier of two permanent magnets a certain distance.
I also wonder when there is a load on the Y coil, how will the primary react, since lorentz force cannot compensate anything in the solid state setup. Maybe the primaries just get hot?






Yeah, Figuera... What a mystery to solve!