Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[Kator01]

Hi Ron,

long no see here. How are you ?

Many things are not clear in this patent/concept:

1) are the N-S-cores one U-shaped core or two cores with an airgap at the bottom
2) how long are the output-coils ?  For me this is the most important question because taking into accout the
    shape of the primary voltage  ( see attachment ) at S and N  then my estimation is that at each moment
    during on cycle the overall magnetic flux across the long secondary coil does not change...but the magnetic
    field-density-distribution along secondary-coil is changing at each step. This then means that - if we assume
    a core-material  exists in the secondary coil - that the inductivity at each end of the secondary coil is
    different ( I know it sounds strange ) ... but with one  exeption: if current is equal in both primary coil
   ( midth of the cycle )

So if I visualize the process during on cycle the magnetic field density at at both ends of the secondary might behave like a standing wave ( reflecitve) ...if one side is decreasing the other side is increasing.
In other words we have a local change of magnetic field-desity without an overall change of the inductivity..
a change without Lenz.

Regards

Kator01

[i_ron]

Hi Ron,

long no see here. How are you ?

Many things are not clear in this patent/concept:

1) are the N-S-cores one U-shaped core or two cores with an airgap at the bottom
2) how long are the output-coils ?  For me this is the most important question because taking into accout the
    shape of the primary voltage  ( see attachment ) at S and N  then my estimation is that at each moment
    during on cycle the overall magnetic flux across the long secondary coil does not change...but the magnetic
    field-density-distribution along secondary-coil is changing at each step. This then means that - if we assume
    a core-material  exists in the secondary coil - that the inductivity at each end of the secondary coil is
    different ( I know it sounds strange ) ... but with one  exeption: if current is equal in both primary coil
   ( midth of the cycle )

So if I visualize the process during on cycle the magnetic field density at at both ends of the secondary might behave like a standing wave ( reflecitve) ...if one side is decreasing the other side is increasing.
In other words we have a local change of magnetic field-desity without an overall change of the inductivity..
a change without Lenz.

Regards

Kator01

Thanks Kator, I am doing fine, two projects on the go beside this...


But yes, that makes sense, trying to follow this so every bit helps!


What I need is to see (or understand) a working model of the principle...


B R,


Ron

[Cadman]

a great power can be carried in a very
small space, stating that the secret of his
invention resembles the egg of Columbus

I may have discovered the meaning of this!

Using the rotating commutator and tapped resistor from the 1908 patent, if you graph the voltage change of the N S solenoids as the brush rotates through 360 degrees the voltage waves are flattened at the extreme difference of voltages. The volts remain at the maximum for one set of coils and minimum for the other set of coils for close to 70 degrees of rotation, at 0 degrees and 180 degrees. Then the voltage bias begins to switch to the opposite coils. In other words the magnetic bias moves back and forth like a pendulum, pausing at the end of each stroke before reversing. The exact amount of 'dwell' would depend on commutator design and brush width.

[Doug1]

Where is the return to the origin in the drawing http://www.overunity.com/12794/re-inventing-the-wheel-part1-clemente_figuera-the-infinite-energy-machine/dlattach/attach/126632/  from page 15? Or the starting power supply conection?

[Cadman]

Thinking some more, I wonder if magnetic spin is involved.

The molecules of the core(s) become aligned N-S, or S-N when magnetized. Molecules have mass, thus inertia. If the NS inducing coils are oriented with like poles to each other, as the field strength transfers from one set of coils to the other, the molecules in the induced core would flip N for S. then S for N, repeatedly.  Wouldn't they? Having mass and inertia I think they would continue in the same direction of 'spin', thus each molecule would become a tiny spinning magnetic field, spinning faster and faster as the inducing field strengths move back and forth at a greater rate. Bruce_TPU on his TPU thread keeps emphasizing "counter rotating magnetic fields" as a key to power.

Something to think about.

@Doug1
The return to origin and the starting power supply would be the square box (battery / power source) just above the signature.