Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[hanon]

A link for those interested in knowing about Hertz Electrodynamics:


http://www.angelfire.com/sc3/elmag/


I see in this theory that there are two different ways to get induction:


1 - with a changing magnetic field in time:  dB/dt
2 - with a moving magnetic field in space:   v x B

[antijon]

@Norman, good effort bro, but as Doug said, will not produce current. If your device is a N on one side, and a S on the other, one swinging out while the other is swinging in, they will produce equal and opposite currents. 1 + -1= 0

Doug, you may be right. Maybe it's time to rebuild my first setup and check the results... That would be the simplest way to interpret Figueras generator, after all.

Hanon, cool link. Do you understand the math?  I'm math illiterate. Good point.
The image is from: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=1455120
and he has a pretty clear answer.

[Doug1]

Antijon
It's worse then that. there is no rotation to reverse the field nor any difference in the number of lines of force between them when they are facing ns in the middle. Only the slight shifting of the outside poles on the outer most n and s far from the Y. Think about the number of times you'll get a pulse. If you end with a freq of 100 cycles per sec it's because you thought there was 2 instead of 4. 2 separate magnets north in 1 north out 1 other n in 1 other north out 1 = 4 not two not three but 4 for stones lol.

[marathonman]

So in light of this new information have had to reconsider my proposal. that leads me to believe that it is NYN, SYS, NYN  ect.... ect
because like you said opposite poles will lead to one magnet so they have to be NYN, SYS.
as one magnet is coming in the other is going out supporting each other in a push pull type of scenario.
so tell me if this is it below.
Thanks for the link Hanon.
But

I am not one to argue but Maxwell's 20 original equations were Altered by Heaviside to erase the free energy equation as was Lorentz. they were paid by JP Morgan,  Heaviside paid once and Lorentz twice.
Einstein was and has been proven wrong from about ten different people. he is a complete Idiot and was paid also to keep status quo .
this site reflects all kinds of mistakes that was probably taught to you in school in witch has been wrong for over 100 years.
I to am math deficient but i read very much more than the average person and have learned a lot. enough to know equations were altered.

[hanon]

So in light of this new information have had to reconsider my proposal. that leads me to believe that it is NYN, SYS, NYN  ect.... ect
because like you said opposite poles will lead to one magnet so they have to be NYN, SYS.
as one magnet is coming in the other is going out supporting each other in a push pull type of scenario.
so tell me if this is it below.

If that were the case then your setup will produce null voltage because the induction created in the left side of the induced coil would be counterbalanced by the induction done in the right side of the coil ( (+1) +  (-1) = 0 ). You are fighting against axial symmetry along the axis joining both inducer poles.

In case of using perpendicular cores I think you would need two output coils (one CW and other CCW) to add up the effect and produce voltage (+1 +1)  . Other option is to used aligned cores, as drawn in some Buforn´s patents. The good thing it is that you may test both alternatives just moving/turning the coils.

This video will be of use to see how induction could be done by flux cutting: 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPbWoaPUE5s