Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[ignacio]

seaad

[NRamaswami]

Ignacio:

How do the six collectors come from 4 Primary coils. Can you please show how you got the six secondary coils using four primary coils? Maximum number of secondary coils as disclosed by Figuera for four primary coils would be two and as disclosed by BuForn would be 3. How did you get six. Can you please show that?

The simple fact is this.. For a given secondary coil size where the primary is thinner and secondary is thicker if the voltage of secondary exceeds a particular value then amperage for secondary comes from the surroundings. Surrounding environment is agitated more if higher frequency is used. Are we successful in inducing this critical higher voltage decides the success or failure of the experiment. From your voltage readings and ampere readings shown it is clear that you are using a wire of lower thickness.

Secondly for an input of about 36 watts you are getting about 40 watts. Not the high wattage claimed by BuForn or Figuera.

The chapter 22 document is nothing new. It shows that if we place square coils of identical poles and use them as inducers the coil inside would be induced. The coil inside can also be used as inducer coil. In this case identical poles are touching each other and there is no connection between the coils that surround the identical poles. All of them are open magnetic cores like in induction coils and not transformer coils which are closed magnetic core. So transformer rules do not apply here.   

[seaad]

The "coil R" is always residing (in the copper) inside every coil.
My pic.  Figuera AC-DC loss.jpg = simplified equivalent circuit diagram, simplified math.  My message = Avoid DC if possible.  You need a hell of OU to counteract DC loss!
But first you must produce OU somehow!         Don't we need a DC path to ground to make that proposed Figuera/marathonman  principle to work??   
Anyhow some "coil R:s" are lurking (not wisible) in your pics.     Arne

[Doug1]

 I can just imagine Clemente pounding his head on his desk repeatedly muttering wtf. I need     a drink.

[ignacio]

Colectoras 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: en la foto 4 inductoras 6 colectoras.
El consumo lo da el ventilador.
¿¿¿La electricidad, debe ser "Radiante" ''???
CF Imita un generador, dinamo, alternador.
Si bajo el consumo, se convierte en electricidad radiante, ¿no es aprovechable?

Bus 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: in picture 4 inducers 6 gatherer.
Consumption is given by the fan.
¿Electricity, should be "Radiant" ''
CF Imitates a generator, dynamo, alternator.
If low consumption, it becomes radiant electricity is not profitable?