Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

NRamaswami: I have studied each and every paragraph of all the patents and almost word for word so their is Nothing you can tell me new.

Apparently you need to reread about part G about 50 more times and think out side that boxed brain of yours.
part G is the most essential part of his device, without it the device will not replace the losses from heat and wire loss or store the energy from the declining electromagnet being shoved out of the secondary.
it's all about magnetism, he uses it to produce electricity, he uses it to regulate his device, he uses it to store excess energy in the core of part G to replace losses. get off your asses and study magnetism, electromagnetism, reluctance and the like then the door to your boxed brain will open up.

Come on people start using your brain, you know the thing that rattles in the upper part of your body.
get of the ass and trace the dates in Germany to Figuera's time and you will see what was used.

Hanon; I thought we were working on 1908 ? you keep me confused some times..... FOCUS !

[NRamaswami]

Marathonman:

You are behaving like a child. Avoid childish conduct.

1. The rotary device does only one thing. It makes and breaks contacts continuously. It needs to do it for the device to work.

2. The rotary device also uses high current and so the current needs to be reduced and the voltage increased. This is done in interrupted DC by providing resistance coils.

3. This does not mean that this is the one and only method of varying the magnetic field strength. Only thing needed to be achieved is to increase and decrease the magnetic field strength to achieve a higher output than input. This has been verified by not only me but others as well.

4. The rotary device also serves the purpose of avoiding the runaway current situation by providing the primaries to earth. The maximum that the primary can reach is the till magnetic saturation of the cores. Nothing more.

5. This can be done again by using a simple spark plug and providing the primarie end to the earth. No runaway current.

I try to understand by experimenting and making observations. I do not try to study and assume and give that assumption a sense of validity.

You need to Grow up first.

By the way where is the your first device?

[batfish]

Como pueden comprobar, las personas, intentan alejar de CF. O de los datos buenos.
Las pruebas que hicimos, año 2012, :> Batería de vehículo, inverter, vasos de agua (regular la electricidad) condensador, 4 bobinas de inducción, diodo, (consumo 220volt 0.8amp 176watt )= =) salida 2 taladros de 550watt + lijadora de banda 1200watt, + decapador 500watt, + radial 500watt todo encendido, +cargador de baterías 12volt 10amp.
Salud, se termina tiempo.

As you can see, people, try to stay away from CD. Or the good data.
The tests we did, year 2012:> vehicle battery, inverter, water glasses (regular electricity) condenser, 4 induction coils, diode, (consumption 220volt 0.8amp 176watt) =) output 2 holes 550watt + sander 1200watt band, + stripper 500watt, 500watt + radial everything on, + 12volt 10amp battery charger.
Health, time is up.

Muy interesante, muchas gracias Ignacio.

My translation with questions/comments in square brackets:

"As you can see, people try to avoid CF [Clemente Figuera], or the good information.
The tests we carried out in 2012: car battery, inverter, buckets of water (to regulate the electricity) [simple if dangerous system for varying resistance by raising and lowering electrodes in water?], 4 induction coils [the inducers?], diode, (consumption [for variable resistance, inducers and diodes?] 220volt 0.8amp 176W )= =) output 2 x 550W drills + belt sander 1200W, + stripper [heat gun?] 500W, + circular saw all switched on, + 12volt 10amp battery charger,
Best wishes, no more time."

Three obvious questions:
* how long did it run?
* was the 12V charger recharging the car battery?
* what happened next?

As I said, many thanks for sharing this information.

Best wishes
Batfish

[batfish]

Ignacio, I realise that 'vasos' may mean 'pot[entiometer]s' - but the effect is the same: variable resistance.

Batfish

[ignacio]

Ignacio, I realise that 'vasos' may mean 'pot[entiometer]s' - but the effect is the same: variable resistance.

Batfish

Consumo 176watt.
Produce +++2000watt
+- ½ hora  , caliente agua, (H, H, O, ¿?)
Al desconectar 1 aparato, subir mucho el voltaje.
Vaso agua, 2 electrodos, acercar, aumento amperaje.

176 watt consumption.
+++ Produces 2000 watt
+ - ½ hour, hot water, (H, H, O,?)
When disconnecting one machine, turn up the voltage much.
Cup water, 2 electrodes, zoom, amperage increase.

Que mas da. lo que diga yo, solo lo que hagas tu, es valido.

Who cares. what I say, just what do you, is valid.