Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

lancaIV · August 20, 2016, 04:52:45 PM

step-by-step lecture research:
at first the articles about the invention,later the original spanish publications

http://www.rexresearch.com/figuera/figuera.htm
So says Mr. Figueras, who is consistent with his scientific creed, has based his significant invention on harnessing the vibrations of the ether, building a device, that he names as Generator Figueras, with the power required to run a motor, as well as powering itself, developing a force of twenty horse power. Should be noted that the produced energy can be applied to all kinds of industries and its cost is zero, because nothing is spent to obtain it. All parts have been built separately in various workshops under the management of the inventor, who has shown the generator running in his home in the city of Las Palmas.

What has been the electrical output from the Figuera device ? Input 100 VA, 100V and 1 Ampére ! Output 300 Ampére and ? Volt ?

"It is stated in the original communication that Prof. Figueras '' has constructed a rough apparatus by which he obtains a current of 550Volts"
Measured or estimated- based by the motor nominal VA input and lightning consume ?

remember:
In my post before I showed you the written numbers from the french inventor Meredieu:
660V and 1,5A as source for a 10 hp motor
AC or DC ?

my result about the first listed 30375 patent :
a variable force -switchable-electromagnet as solution explained

30376:
In summary: in the machine that it is requested to have a privilege, the excitatory magnets are constructed as those in the current machines, and in the number, size and desired arrangement. The core consists of a group of as many electromagnets as those of the excitatory side, and the wires in the excitatory electromagnets and core electromagnets disposed in series or parallel or as required for the excitatory current, whose aim is to convert them in powerful magnets and to create the magnetic fields which are formed between the poles of each excitatory electromagnet and its corresponding electromagnet in the core. Both, exciter electromagnets as those in the core, which are also exciters, are terminated by expansions of iron or steel, placing face to face these expansions and disposing them in such a way that in front of a pole of a name there is placed a pole of opposite name. The core is composed of motionless electromagnets around shaft, and nor those magnets neither the exciter ones rotate. The induced circuit formed by wires coiled in a drum type configuration rotates around its axis, inside the magnetic fields, accompanied by a collector and a pulley, so that any motor may put them into movement.

= Mukherjee
"Electric generator without external mechanical energy source - uses conventional generator and electric unit carrying field magnets and armature" working principle:

unifying Figueras splitted only electro-magnets using -two parts-concept
part II : http://www.rexresearch.com/figuera/figuera-blasb.jpg

30377
But, as the distribution and establishment of magnetic fields is always the same and independent of the rotation, the undersigned inventors have thought that it is not needed to move the core for the induced coils to cut the existing lines of force between the pole faces of the exciter electromagnets and the core, producing this way the induction, and it is enough that the induced circuit will be separated by a very tiny distance from this core, only rotating the induced coil, for which, it is not required a great strength since, with copper being diamagnetic, simply it is sufficient with the necessary effort to overcome the air resistance, friction of brushes, and higher or lower attraction from currents to currents, effort which is easily obtained using a suitable electric motor driven by an independent current, or by a part of the total current given by the machine. This procedure allows to obtain currents remarkably identical to those existing today in dynamos, but without using driving force which is today used and wasted away, almost entirely, in rotating the soft iron core.

The Figuera device has physical rotating parts and a motor makes part !

30378
The current dynamos, come from groups of Clarke machines, and our generator recalls, in its fundamental principle, the Ruhmkorff induction coil.
In that -Clarke- machine the induction machine is created by movement of the induced circuit:
in the generator, induction occurs because of the intermittences of the current which magnetize the electromagnets, and in order to achieve these intermittences or changes in sign, only is required a very small quantity or almost negligible force, we, with our generator, produce the same effects of current dynamos without using any driving force at all.

In the arrangement of the excitatory magnets and the induced, our generator has some analogy with dynamos, but completely differs from them in that, not requiring the use of motive power, is not a transforming apparatus.
As much as we take, as a starting point, the fundamental principle that supports the construction of the Ruhmkorff induction coil, our generator is not a cluster of these coils which differs completely.

It has the advantage that the soft iron core can be constructed with complete indifference of the induced circuit, allowing the core to be a real group of electromagnets, like the exciters, and covered with a proper wire in order that these electromagnets may develop the biggest attractive force possible, without worrying at all about the conditions that the induced wire must have for the voltage and amperage that is desired. In the winding of this induced wire, within the magnetic fields, are followed the requirements and practices known today in the construction of dynamos, and we refrain from going into further detail, believing it unnecessary.

Enough for today

Sincerely
OCWL

guest1289 · August 20, 2016, 08:12:41 PM

Quote from: Erfinder on August 18, 2016, 02:35:39 PM
How many have actually kicked back in your favorite chair, or sofa, with a nice adult beverage, possibly chilled, and contemplated what Lenz was suggesting? It's not a bad idea, contemplating that which he suggests through his penned observation. Laws are made by men to govern men! Lenz did not pen a law, he placed his thoughts on paper, and shared those thoughts with like minded men of his time. Influential men in his time, with vested interest in the future shaped the future using ideas presented to them by insightful individuals. They decide which ideas would become the ideas which all men would structure their lives around. Place yourself in the position of the man who made the observation, respect the position of those few who comprehended its ability to bind the ignorant together.

When Lenz's observation is truly comprehended, we observe that the way forward is as simple as creating a beat, those among you who can will comprehended what has just been given. Lenz is not holding any of us back, ignorance, and its cousin arrogance is.

Maybe you could start a thread proving why Lenz's-Law is incorrect, but hopefully also explaining it in terms that people like me can understand, since I only understand the basics of why a magnet falling down a copper pipe, falls slower than outside of the pipe, or why the magnet will float when moving across a sheet of copper, eddies, and that they claim that a transformer can only function by using moving-magnetic-fields.

Think up a Test or Device, that will really Amplify the error( errors ) in Lenz's-Law

You'd think you could present your proof to MIT university, due to the following :
http://overunity.com/16782/mit-graham-gunderson-video-release-of-the-conference-demonstration/
__________

I am starting to wonder if proof why Lenz's-Law may be incorrect, could be the imaging-research( electron-microscope research ) which shows that the magnetic-field( consists of ) forms tiny vortices emanating from the surface( Magnetic Tubes of Force ), WHICH DIRECTLY LEADS ME TO MY QUESTION :

NOTE : Think of my question as a generator, not a motor

My Only Question Is :
- If you have a 'Free-Spinning-Disc-Magnet' on a shaft, and then you bring a 'Straight-Wire-Carrying-Non-Pulsed-DC-Current' near( but not touching ) to one-half of the 'Disc-Magnet'( OR, to the surface of the outer-edge of the 'Disc-Magnet' ), WILL IT CAUSE THE 'DISC-MAGNET' TO SPIN ?

( OR, would this generate any electricity ? )

The diagram-below shows my question, the large-circle is the Disc-Magnet, and the wire is labelled X.

Cadman · August 20, 2016, 08:43:14 PM

Quote from: lancaIV on August 20, 2016, 04:52:45 PM
step-by-step lecture research:

30376:

30377

The Figuera device has physical rotating parts and a motor makes part !

30378
induction occurs because of the intermittences of the current which magnetize the electromagnets, and in order to achieve these intermittences or changes in sign, only is required a very small quantity or almost negligible force, we, with our generator, produce the same effects of current dynamos without using any driving force at all.

Enough for today

Sincerely
OCWL

I am only posting this because I believe you to be sincere and open minded. Please note the evolution of these first patents. The next patent 44267 is the first patent with the infamous 'part G' and the claim of self running. It is a completely new and different machine evolved from the previous versions. Part G coupled with the resistance is what indicates DC exciting current. The proponents of the N-N and S-S polarity arrangement, myself included, have adopted that view through testing and the lack of specific mention of AC current (as is in common use today) in this and later patents.

It is critical not to mix the properties of these first patents with the later versions.

Regards
CM

lancaIV · August 21, 2016, 05:13:38 AM

forest · August 21, 2016, 06:07:26 AM

Quote from: lancaIV on August 21, 2016, 05:13:38 AM
Between the later patent publications read ,especially marathonman and 100% Figuera device related and in original language :

1.problem: translation/transduction from a uncommon/foreign language (also today a great problem: automatic translater comparision)

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCOv19wRBnvftioqQ-W8IScg
clearly only one view from the object and trial by prototyping

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=89DyGj1nHcU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0K7ToVjkh4
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c01LV-k-Piw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYnm64SZuCU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es6PbrJRCsE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVIbNk-ELUE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AJQF0-H7RQM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EpbfnhKL-po
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSunv5bnj_w
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sM_yJZfbZB4

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdzFY7XrFfY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kdzFY7XrFfY
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W4H06wl1O-o

How many comments ? How many followers ? net-wide ?

second youtube-experimenter:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMyDmJ_wt7YeP5hshuvgc2Q

Thank You. That is useful comment ! I think it would work if he place output coils at 90 degrees on the central core part. Like he experimented here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=siaYNVDCG4U I hope someone translate those videos

Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

lancaIV

guest1289

Cadman

lancaIV

forest