Re-Inventing The Wheel-Part1-Clemente_Figuera-THE INFINITE ENERGY MACHINE

[marathonman]

There is an extreme lack of common sense towards part G in the thought of how it's resistance is implemented in the device. if a resistance in the form of a resistor is used which waste potential that is totally unrecoverable then how to you expect this device to self sustain it it has to supply the primaries potential on a continuous basis. sorry to burst your bubble but it can not.
That thought is totally preposterous and will result in one only logical conclusion, a dead device that will not sustain it's self in any way shape or form.
it behooves you to do the research that proves the validity of this statement with out a doubt.   i to at one time thought part G was resistors but i came to the revelation to the reality after months on the bench proved otherwise thus proving the validity of information from Mr Doug was in fact genuine and scientifically correct.

on the other hand if the proper research was conducted by the individual one would have surmised the use of an inductor used in the proper form outside of the present day usage,  would then arrive at the logical conclusion that the inductance used in a dynamic active state can store and release potential thus reducing  the primary potential draw from the system to that of just the IR2 losses allowing the system to be self sustaining. one then would realize the magnetic fields in the process of storing and releasing of said energies can also be used to control currant on a continuous basis with very high coefficients of self induction by using a core of a high permeability and a large number of coil turns.

if the realization of these very factually scientifically accurate statements are not taken into consideration the probabilities of self sustainment will be reduce to the sum of ZERO.

Of course the choice of one's path is entirely guided by realization of the truth acquired in the pursuit of enlightenment. remaining a fish in the ocean of energies is ones prerogative,  inside looking out.

Marathonman

[seaad]

it's not really a variable resistor; it's a variable inductor    It must be intermitantly making/breaking contact as it changes from one coil position to another....
when the change stops the same current through both sides (mostly, there is a tiny different in resistance),
and after a time of the magnetic field buildup...

Although I'm not entirely clear why turning one way lights one and turning the other lights the other... maybe because of the changing indductance, as it reduces, the current is increased while the other is decreased because of increased induction?

Hi d3x0r , All
That stay on lit delay effect is a bit puzzling. And I wonder if the voltage across the bulbs goes higer than the battery voltage? I have tried to simulate this circuit with a 20 steps LT Spice Simulation but it gave no such delay effects. I think we have to build a simple test bed with a real variable transformer. But sadly I don't own such. Maybe someone in the audience here is in the possession  of a variable transformer and can replicate that simple test with an osc-scope connected also to verify the effects? A higher voltage across the bulbs and the delay effect.

Regards Arne

[marathonman]

Nice core by the way.

Quote from Wikipedia;
"Any alteration to a circuit which increases the flux (total magnetic field) through the circuit produced by a given current increases the inductance, because inductance is also equal to the ratio of magnetic flux to current."

Sorry d3x0r but my so called  theory on part G is NOT A THEORY, it is plain FACT backed by Physics, real Science and years of bench work, something you seen to be lacking in.

The device pic shown when used with DC will turn the device into an inductor which can theoretically be called a variable transformer but the fact is, it doesn't transform anything.
The more appropriate description would be an inductance amplifier as the magnetic fields of all devices in the system when reduced releases potential when combined causing an amplification to the rising side offsetting the potential drop of storing into the magnetic field for the next half cycle. thus a variable transformer will not function in this capacity as the sole purpose of the device is to store and release potential at the appropriate time amplifying the signal to the rising side of the device.

part G has many functions and if any one of them are negated the device will not operate properly thus will not self sustain. it will then act as a transformer from the fact that potential is supplied to it all the time and this is to be avoided in the Figuera device.

the video a long time ago from Hanon was suggested by me to show him the validity of part G and inductance. when using DC the variac then turned into a self inductance device with the turn of the knob but when stationary did nothing unlike the real part G that has a rotating brush thus varies the inductance on a continuous basis which changes the ratio of magnetic field to currant, which is the ratio of reverse EMF to the original currant flow.

which is exactly what i have been saying for how may years now and still it falls on deaf ears. fish will remain fish no matter what body of water they swim in.

Marathonman

[marathonman]

Another thing i would like to enlighten people on is the fact that the ring part G Doug so used did in fact work abit some balancing issues i have so encountered myself. just because someone didn't use enough winds did not change the fact that it did to quite some success.

so continuing on this line of reasoning as long as part G is a closed core the shape of it is inconsequential as long as the brush can still rotate in an increase decrease fashion. the use of a closed EI core or a closed C core will do the same thing as long as it is closed core system retaining the magnetic flux fields.
I am in fact building a closed C core part G that will alleviate the balancing issues i have encountered with the ring core which will make it not only easy to balance but easier to wind.  as we all know a toroid is a bitch to wind especially if it is a deep core. then on top of that it is a total bitch to balance.
it is not like your standard C core that has the G dimension being the longest dimension. in my core the A and D is the longest dimension giving the C core a very nice flat surface to wind on. i will then used an adhesive then use a surface grinder to precision flatness for a perfect non sparking brush rotation.
i also designed a custom brush holder that can adjust the diameter of the brushes. this will allow me to dial in the exact high and low's of currant presented to the primaries according to the primary secondary core ratio. it also holds the slip rings and the commutator then attaches to the motor. hopefully i will finish in time to present it with the new part G.

I will present the G core in a week or two when it comes in and i wind it. it is around 12 to 1500 va so i can add additional cores in the future to increase the output.
every single function has been retained as the original thus i foresee no further complication to arise from that of the ring core.

in my off time from the forums i was able to clear my head of the forum BS and make some very startling discoveries through my research and bench work. i now reside on a very, very quiet forum that allows me to think quite clearly and rationally. i am also in a working partnership in the design and building of the 1932 Coutier device (pronounced cou-ti-ay) that amplifies currant to the 6th degree and thus foresee a working device by the end of this year. this also will be presented to everyone at the same time of showing proving the validity of self sustainment.

the 150 year perpetual motion lie will come to a screeching halt.

Marathonman

[d3x0r]

I will say; I was about to put my foot in my mouth I dunno few days ago about N and S blocks not being N and N.
a N approaching one side of a coil and a N receding from the other side of a coil do generate current in the same direction... which is constructive interference... oscillating increasing current to one side, while decreasing current on the other in the same polarity; so on that point, for this, I do have to concur with bucking coils...


The resistance factor doesn't have to be that great....
10 ohms to 1000 ohms is 1:100
same as 0.1 ohms to 10 ohms... which are not a huge loss... I suppose you could range your resistance from 10k to 1M ... probably wouldn't get much OU from that; but then again maybe it's enough to loop and power itself since it also wouldn't consume much current.  but then again, isn't like every potentiometer (variable resistor) balanced from left to right, so you just have to find a way to twist the swiper back and forth?


This device set were all about moving the field back and forth, not moving a formed field past the coil.... because in that scenario, an approaching north to one side of a coil generates the same current as the south side approaching(not a recession in this case) the other side of the coil... and Since Pierre's is really about having a constant field that you can move, these are quite independant.... unless via 'many arrangments are possible' he(Figuera) really meant a totally different arrangement than the one illustrated for 2d paper.