Graham Gunderson?s dragless generator patent, Lenz law violation !

[hartiberlin]

Hello,
for those of you being a few years already in the free energy scene and being
on my old Yahoogroups list, you probably remember Graham Gunderson,
who did a lot of research in strange coils setups and who claimed to have
invented a dragless generator.

It seems he joined Magnetic Power Inc. and now here is his
patent about his dragless generator, that seems to violate LENZ law.

Pretty clever Graham ! Congratulations !

Hope to seen your gadget being produced and introduced worldwide !
Here is the patent with a lot of drawings and circuit diagram:

http://www.magneticpowerinc.com/mpi-patentapplication.pdf

Regards, Stefan

[hartiberlin]

I now had a closer look at this design and I was wrong, it is no a mechanical
generator, but a solid state overunity type transformer...!

It seems it is required that all 3 fields,
input coil field , Permanent magnet field and output coil
field must be in 90 degrees orthogonal relationship to each other,
so 2 of them can cancel out, which is the output coil field with the
permanent magnet field, so the input coil?s
field is not much affected and thus no drag is put onto the input coil?s field.
Is this correct ?

It is pretty complicated to grasp.
Regards, Stefan.

[Liberty]

Interesting patent application.  Wonder if the patent guys will frown on the Lentz law violation? 

Comment:  It appears to me that the magnets are on top of the ring and also in attract on the bottom of the ring.  (Flux flowing vertically through the ring from Permanent magnet to Permanent magnet).  Then the coil that weaves in and out horizontally through the center of the ring between flux flow points collects the magnetic flux change caused by the input 'push coil' of the other vertically wound coil around the ring.  The collector coil receives the "pushed/deflected" magnetic flux, causing an induced current in the horizontal looped winding for output.  Apparently more power is able to be collected in the output coil than is expended in the excite 'push' coil.  It also appears that one can stack these devices, making better use of the magnets.

[mark australia]

Dear Liberty, Tao's post goes along the lines of recent communications i have had with you re the demag issue on other devices..
Kind regards
mark

[hartiberlin]

I think, as the counter field from the output current will stay inside the core, the permanent
magnets from Graham?s patent will not demagnetize as the field will never
go to the level of -Hc which would be required to weaken the magnets...
So I guess this is a very safe unit which will not demagnetize the magnets in our live-time.

I think this is the smartest design of a solid state free energy device I have seen so far
and indeed I always trusted Graham to be a genuine inventor with all his very clever
ideas and smart thinking and experiments.

He also had a real mechanical dragless generator already a few years back, which was
a mechanical design, but had too many losses in the gears he was using, he told me at this time..