Crystal Cell Research

[jbignes5]

 Yes awesome.


Has anyone tried the new hydrophobic sprays they have now to create a water barrier? This would eliminate the galvanic arguments.

[plengo]

@jbignes5,

Once I tested a conductive grease (I forgot the name) for that one question. BTW, I loved your idea and checked on youtube anything about this spray and I found this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEH6tDLKcVU. I was impressed of the power of the compound of the spray that is capable of being more granular than water molecules and still penetrate the material (such as a boot or brick) and dry up there.


Anything above water will fall.


My test worked with mixed results. In one is that the grease did let initially pass "electricity" and run the load but eventually it did not resisted the power of the chemicals on the cell and end up being punctured allowing "ions" to flow and complete the oxidation.


I am suspicious that a permanent barrier of "ions" would indeed work, as long only "electrons" pass through to the other side of the dipole.




@All,


a question. Let's suppose one crystal cell is able to have a total resistance of 26 mega ohms. With the media dry, it gives about some voltage. No current. Over a load.


Now, add water to the same mix (without a load) and measuring resistance again I would expect to have a much lower resistance once water is added. Result was 26 mega ohms again (+/-).


Question is: Could a cell with those characteristics give more current? if yes, and the resistance still being 26 mega ohms, would this be considered a closed loop system? (at least of any useful level).


If no, would not that mean that no current is flowing for either not having any current being generated or for the current not being able to pass 26 mega ohm of resistance in any useful level (like in groups of 5 cells, run a LED).


Now the puzzle, once load is inserted, the cell gives current and voltage. How's that?


If I hear an answer like, the load being of lower resistance than the cell would provide a drop in potential and therefore current would exist? I don't buy that.


If I hear that with the load the resistance of the cell ALSO lowered? I don't buy that either.


Fausto.

Yes awesome.


Has anyone tried the new hydrophobic sprays they have now to create a water barrier? This would eliminate the galvanic arguments.

[jbignes5]

It's in the stores now Called never wet as a spray from rustolium. Aparently they bought it...


http://www.homedepot.com/p/Rust-Oleum-Stops-Rust-18-oz-NeverWet-Multi-Purpose-Spray-Kit-274232/204216476#.UlvfoFA_t_M

I'm just wondering if it is ionic conductive?

[plengo]

Thank you for the link. I will buy it and try it out.


Fausto.

It's in the stores now Called never wet as a spray from rustolium. Aparently they bought it...


http://www.homedepot.com/p/Rust-Oleum-Stops-Rust-18-oz-NeverWet-Multi-Purpose-Spray-Kit-274232/204216476#.UlvfoFA_t_M

I'm just wondering if it is ionic conductive?

[plengo]

I found this concerning batteries internal resistance (IR):


http://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=634808


http://data.energizer.com/PDFs/BatteryIR.pdf


http://www.power-sonic.com/images/powersonic/sla_batteries/pg_series/PG-12V200_11_Jan_12.pdf
http://www.power-sonic.com/images/powersonic/sla_batteries/ps_psg_series/12volt/PS-121400FR_11_Feb_21.pdf
http://www.power-sonic.com/images/powersonic/Info%20for%20PHR%20section%20of%20website%2011%20Nov%2015/PHR-12500_12_July_2.pdf




This all tells me that normal Lead Acid Batteries are around 3 to 5 mili-ohms. My cells has 26 Mega Ohms and still giving voltage and current. That's so strange to me.


I really need help here.


Fausto.