Single circuits generate nuclear reactions

[aleks]

Carbon is thus simultaneously excited by an electric field and a variable magnetic field varies with the same frequency but d?phas?.

It's interesting since such arrangement suggests that electromagnet that surrounds carbon rod is purposedly stops current in the carbon rod. It's much different and much more energy efficient (less heat) than discharge, but I wonder if dynamically it's the same as creating graphite powder unrest - meaning that in such conditions graphite crystallites slap each other like mad not knowing where to align (resulting in heat and probably magnetic monopoles) - carbon rod thus turns into a resistor. I guess induced current and carbon rod current should be matched to be roughly equal so that summary current is zero. 90 degree phase difference is to be expected due to law of magnetic induction: induction current is 90 deg ahead of voltage used in inductor, so voltage should be further shifted by 90 deg in inductor to produce counteracting current in carbon rod.

Worth checking out if discharges lead to nowhere.

[argona369]

Though the original device in this thread is probably fake.
The concept seems hopeful.

In the spirit of Tesla (his mass of infinitely small size) and Testatika (you can see that in the Testatika that their cylinders
have a slight coating of graphite (reflective metallic coating))

here's one good example, (thank's steve, good site)
http://rimstar.org/sdenergy/testa/misc/TESTA4.JPG

What about a dielectric rod or a cylinder rubbed with a pencil or graphite powder?

?It is now presumed that tiny fragments of graphene sheets are produced (along with quantities of other debris) whenever graphite is abraded?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Graphene

and another interesting property, electron mass.
gravity maybe??
"Electrons lose their mass in carbon sheets"
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/23538

high voltage/ high resistance of course.

Cliff,

[Feynman]

I do not think the original device is fake.  Groundloop noted wires running into the toroid and derived a hypothetical cross-section. See Thread Page 13.

[Earl]

Part of a translated commentary by Charlie Renegade, whoever he is  ???
......

Do you have the original text or the URL of the French text ?

Earl

[Earl]

I do not think the original device is fake.  Groundloop noted wires running into the toroid and derived a hypothetical cross-section.

There are lots of wires running into the toroid, but I never saw any wires running into the center of the toroid.

Earl