converting cosmic rays to electricity comparing to T.H.Moray's device

[wings]

.....gain power from the gas multiplication effect of the Townsend avalanche and maybe the negative resistance characteristics of the dynatron (which doesn't need a heated cathode because the x-ray emitter supplies the electrons). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynatron

http://www.ietlabs.com/pdf/GR_Experimenters/1930/GenRad_Experimenter_May_1930.pdf

http://www.overunity.com/3628/farnsworth-fusor-and-multipactor/#.URAarFoX6-M

http://teslapress.com/vactube.html

www.google.com/patents/US1969399

http://www.overunity.com/1965/correas-pagd-in-action/msg23706/#msg23706

http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/07.12/plasmatron.html

http://www.rexresearch.com/chernetskii/chernetskii.htm


....... European Space Agency ..
http://multipactor.esa.int/whatis.html

http://multipactor.esa.int/

.... Department of Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences, University of Michigan ...
Steady state multipactor and dependence on material properties

http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/70121/PHPAEN-4-3-863-1.pdf;jsessionid=32D79BF0DE58DA4E42B9B80D0F026F59?sequence=2

[yellowsnow2]

Thanks for the interesting and relevant links. I haven't made it through all of it yet.

This link you posted settles what this tube of Moray's actually is. It is a dynatron oscillator suped up with x-rays. Compare the Moray patent http://www.freeenergyplanet.info/free-energy-devices/images/2370_631_275-thomas-henry-moray-device.jpg
Compared to dynatron oscillator page 3 figure 1   http://www.ietlabs.com/pdf/GR_Experimenters/1930/GenRad_Experimenter_May_1930.pdf

So it would seem my theory might be going a different direction than Moray's device.

But closer to the Plasmatron in this link, with it's large reverse flow energy spikes. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/07.12/plasmatron.html

In a few more days when stuff comes in the mail I will start some testing.

[wings]

Thanks for the interesting and relevant links. I haven't made it through all of it yet.

This link you posted settles what this tube of Moray's actually is. It is a dynatron oscillator suped up with x-rays. Compare the Moray patent http://www.freeenergyplanet.info/free-energy-devices/images/2370_631_275-thomas-henry-moray-device.jpg
Compared to dynatron oscillator page 3 figure 1   http://www.ietlabs.com/pdf/GR_Experimenters/1930/GenRad_Experimenter_May_1930.pdf

So it would seem my theory might be going a different direction than Moray's device.

But closer to the Plasmatron in this link, with it's large reverse flow energy spikes. http://www.silverbearcafe.com/private/07.12/plasmatron.html

In a few more days when stuff comes in the mail I will start some testing.

other interesting readings related to plasma Self-Organization
http://www.dtic.mil/cgi-bin/GetTRDoc?AD=ADP015026
http://epsppd.epfl.ch/Praha/WEB/98ICPP_W/H094PR.PDF
...
http://www.rrp.infim.ro/2008_60_3/43-885-898.pdf

... plasma source of life
http://www.dapla.org/pdf/Lozneanu1.pdf

[pix]

Keep up the good work.   It may be there is a lack of responses here as Moray's work has been discussed at length before.   Probably one of the most in depth researchers on his material is Bruce Perreault.   Are you familiar with him or his work?   He has a web site or two (may have changed recently) but try www.nuenergy.org and www.sonomagnetics.com  if you don't already know about them.

Hi,
Very good input.
I did said the same thing on this forum many times.A simple spark discharge is in fact a current multiplier.It is like a nuclear chain reaction, but happening with electrons.A single electron at the beginning, and kA range of current at the end of spark discharge enters the circuit.It is OU in front of our noses.
Regards,
Pix

[pix]

Did some more research..

The Townsend avalanche seems to be the same thing as the nuclear chain reaction that powers nuclear power plants..... Except on a smaller scale  (in the ion scale instead of protons and neutrons)....without radiation emissions (that aren't used)......And in a safe way because of the process's self limiting effect "Raether limit" where the gas in the tube becomes so ionized that it becomes conductive and self discharges .. in contrast to the run away nuclear chain reaction that ends up as a bomb.

It acts as a free current amplifier....


So by introducing one elctron or positron it will put out around 1000000000 to 10000000000 electrons.

Hi yellowsnow2,
Sorry to repeat, my reply was directed to you:
>>>Hi,
Very good input.
I did said the same thing on this forum many times.A simple spark discharge is in fact a current multiplier.It is like a nuclear chain reaction, but happening with electrons.A single electron at the beginning, and kA range of current at the end of spark discharge enters the circuit.It is OU in front of our noses.
Regards,
Pix<<<<