Bashar's Spacecraft Engine

[Hope]

I also found this animation that could be thought of similar to what Bashar's device could be doing.
The gif is supposed to be an animation.  Is important to see in animation mode   can someone get it form testilca topic and repost correctly??

[WTF]

You can see all the parts I've used on pages 3 -4, although right now I'm wiring a fully conductive wire net.

[WTF]

As you can see from the picture you will see where the points cross, also the heart of the flash matrix also has a heart in it.

[Uniqorn]

Time for a review, as I can see WTF's efforts being undermined by pretty much ignoring the detail of Bashar's Transcript.

1. It is fair to conclude, none of us know how the device really works.
(It's a brand new, hearsay, unproven on this earth, and pretty much considered impossible by the science of the day).

2. So, any speculation and/or experimentation has to rest on a firm foundation, and the ONLY reliable foundation available is Bashar's Transcript. This is the Starting Point.

3. Any deviation from this foundation devalues all results gained.

4. This is the now the third time I've said it in this forum: READ the TRANSCRIPT. This means you will be listening to what Bashar said - not me.


Now, when I provide my opinion, it is based firmly on Bashar's word. I quote and clearly show how I come to my conclusions, and expect the same from other commentators. This is not because Bashar's word is un-challengable, but because that's all we have to work with.

Otherwise, you are welcome to invent a new device based on a principal we have little, if any, understanding of.
You are only embarking on this venture because of Bashar's sharing, so why ignore his advice?

[Uniqorn]

You both have been very helpful, so thank you.

Regarding having different angle of one of the spirals, I know what you mean, when you look at sunflowers, but these are more random not just one of the overlaid spirals that are different, unless I hear this from Bashar I won't change that ever, as these are 100% proper Fibonacci spirals.

(snipped)

See I'm now coming to your way of thinking Uniqorn (now you can have your sigh of relieve) but the template will remain symmetrical, that will never change without 100% evidence to back up your theory, remember nature isn't perfect, it's a representation of perfection. But the other things you have suggested do seem logical so I will try them.

Another way the wire net could be done is do 2 separate single spirals and then put them together, not what you call interwoven, but if there meant to be in contact with each other then would be easier.

@WTF
1. I'm not calling it interwoven, Bashar is calling it interwoven.

2. Bashar states to emulate, in the Transcript, "Fibonacci spirals", which is a precise mathematical structure.

3. He also states to emulate nature, such as the sunflower seed spirals, which follow, very precisely, but not perfectly (say 97%?), the Fibonacci spiral.

4. A very special, but well-known feature of Fibonacci spirals is the multiple angle, asymmetrical spirals that all live neatly together. This feature is what many believe lends it its beauty.
(just do a google image search on "fibonacci spiral" and you can see this clearly for yourself.)

5. Therefore, a perfectly symmetrical spiral is either not a Fibonacci spiral, or it is a special case, which is not seen in nature, which you will discover to be true if you do my suggested google image search.

Instead of challenging me to come up with "100% evidence to back up (my theory)", which is not a theory, just me reporting what Bashar says, then how about you provide me with some better reasoning on why you came to your method, which clearly ignores Bashar's plan?



WTF, I still very much admire your willingness to take on this task. I am finding it difficult to witness you drift off track, so my intention is to guide you back in the direction as laid out by Bashar.
You are welcome to take these deviations from Bashar's plan. Any negative results will simply require you that you go back to transcript, otherwise they will not be conclusive.