Quantum Energy Generator (QEG) Open Sourced (by HopeGirl)

[vidbid]

I believe that somebody asked about QEG caps: http://be-do.com/index.php/en/qeg-parts-tools/113-qeg-capacitors

In some of my research, I have found some interesting material.

I don't know if I'm reading this article by Sterling Allan correctly but it seems to me from what I read (and I could be wrong about that) that Mr. Dansie doesn't believe that motor-generators are capable of overunity, that, essentially, they are all bogus? Please correct me if I am wrong about that.

http://freeenergynews.com/SmartScarecrow/2013/12/12/

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Former_Member:Mark_Anthony_Dansie

Regards,

VIDBID

[vidbid]

It is fine to have development projects, but call them that from the start.
Kind Regards
Mark

That sounds reasonable enough to me for any type of business.

The beauty for me is I don't know. I don't know if the QEG works, but then again, I don't know that it doesn't work.

If it doesn't work, then what have I lost? Some time and effort. Do I intend to part with my money? Not at this time. However, I am willing to look at this technology with an open mind.

One thing is certain: The genie is out of the bottle, and it isn't going back in.

Regards,

VIDBID

[gotoluc]

@gotoluc

I left you a post at OUR, Maybe take a read and let me know.

Listen, this QEG is doing what? Producing volts. Just use a Tesla coil and it will do the same thing.

Basically if this QEG requires anything that will rotate, what do you think will be the outcome. Moving a piece of iron to produce an electromagnet, and then we all wonder why it seizes.

My gut tells me this is a group of people that embarked on a build, went a little overboard on costs, did not get the results and now they are trying to recoup as much as they can by convincing others to chime in with some money to get "starter plans" of something that does not work. Chime in on what?

I was in a Quebec group of motor/generator/gearing guys and we spent 250K to find out certain methods won't work. hahaha. We did not afterwards go public to offer to sell the tech slating it as "for further development".

My own hint when planning to make big builds, first establish a small R&D business. I have three companies, two that are in my specialty of water treatment and the third I use only for R&D. All my R&D expenses go into that company and the capital just grows and grows. If I close the company tomorrow, I can get 50% of the capital as personal tax credit. If I use the company to make a big profit on something (it has to be big), then after paying a corporate tax of 20% I can then take all the capital I put in right back into my pocket non-taxable. One day, if I ever decide to actually pay myself a salary for R&D, the Canadian Government will pay me back 50% of that. hahaha

The QEG will work miracles when one day, we find a way to make that piece of iron approach the MOT then disappear. But that is not possible in the foreseeable future. The only other way I can think of is explained at OUR.

The solution I am proposing to you at OUR is to try and push the idea into a more realistic and especially a more out-of-the-box approach. Imagine a huge core having a coil of 20-40 Henries or so, just moving the plate in and out not even at a very fast speed should produce some good output that could be capped and then really be usable. Is it OU, don't know but it has a much better shot at working then turning a wheel.

But as soon as you start playing the rotation game, you are stuck with the progressive rise, peak, progressive fall and during all that time, you are setting up the electromagnetic demise because the approaching iron generates the jail it then gets caught in.

The other main problem with your testing versus QEG is leverage. Since your I core is at the outside of a rotating system, a drag of 1 between the I and E core will be transfered to the motor as a drag of 10 (as an example). So just a slight seizing at the outer end of the rotation will produce great drag force on the motor. That's leverage and the way it is set-up, it is working against you.

The QEG on the other hand has the rotor plates close to the shaft so the reverse leverage from drag will still be felt but not as much as your system. It will however suffer from lower rotor plate speed across the stator plates. This is because at a fixed RPM, a large diameter wheel will provide more end speed then a smaller diameter wheel. So the QEG only had one more option, increase rotation speed, but as you increase rotation speed, if you do not increase the applied horsepower as well, you now will have much less torque. So this game has been played and played and played for so many years and people forget to consider all the chips on the table before placing a bet. They think they are doing something new, spend the bucks, then cry to mommy when it all goes south.

But whatever you do man, I am always loving every minute of it because I appreciate your genuine effort to help the world, like many of us here. Pure intent is what you exude when you are authentic. And, it does not hurt to have friends that check your back. hahaha

The pick up coil wants to see change. Change occurs when the iron plate approaches and it also occurs when it backs away. The small instant of no movement is what I would be interested in that you cannot produce when rotating. hehehe

wattsup

Thanks wattsup for taking the time to write such a long post.

For some reason I never get email notification of a replied at OUR?

I agree with what you say but since there was a super high value Inductance connected to a capacitor it really got my attention because of my work and experiments on the effects of phase shift.

For the past two days I've been testing a design of my own of a solid state version. I see a little OU but it's small, at most 1 watt, so it could be scope math power calculation error. I'll try to boost it (if I can) to try to eliminate possible error.

I'll look at OUR for your post

Luc

[markdansie]

I believe that somebody asked about QEG caps: http://be-do.com/index.php/en/qeg-parts-tools/113-qeg-capacitors

In some of my research, I have found some interesting material.

I don't know if I'm reading this article by Sterling Allan correctly but it seems to me from what I read (and I could be wrong about that) that Mr. Dansie doesn't believe that motor-generators are capable of overunity, that, essentially, they are all bogus? Please correct me if I am wrong about that.

http://freeenergynews.com/SmartScarecrow/2013/12/12/

http://peswiki.com/index.php/Congress:Former_Member:Mark_Anthony_Dansie

Regards,

VIDBID

I have seen none to date that work, however I am happy to keep my mind open. There are some other interesting anomalies and approaches I have been made aware of that may make the process possible, but not in the form of a magnetic motor generator.
Sterling has an excellent site that has documented hundreds of failed magnetic motors and sell looped gensets over the last decade. Some even ended up in jail.
I personally do not give much credibility to anything Sterling says, especially the numerology nonsense. He does provide a valuable service.
Kind Regards
Mark
PS you can read my articles at Revolution_Green.com
Kind Regards as always

[DreamThinkBuild]

Hi Luc and Laurent,

Thank you for those tests. While I'm not really following the QEG I find the change in inductance and the self excitation from it's change through a capacitor fascinating. Luc's test with the oscillation slowly building up reminds me of a flux compression generator. Instead of placing a seed voltage on the coils it is built up internally.

I finally got in the lab and did a very simple test with an electromagnet to see how bringing different material near the coil would change the inductance. Attached is a pdf of the results.

Using the preliminary results it might be possible to make sectors or squirrel cage type design of alternating aluminum and galvanized steel wire (electric fence wire) to pass in front of the inductor to induce parametric change.

A solid state version might be possible by just shorting out a coil. I haven't tried this but an idea is to take a galvanized steel core and wrap a coil (maybe aluminum wire?) around it, then short and un-short with a switch. Would have to do more tests to see how shorting a coil wrapped around the material would effect the inductance. The efficiency is still the question though.

Here are some patents for reference.

4200831 - Compensated pulsed alternator

https://www.google.com/patents/US4200831

4266180 - Method of and means for high performance direct current electrical pulse generation utilizing mechanical energy storage

https://www.google.com/patents/US4266180

4431960 - Current Amplifying Apparatus

https://www.google.com/patents/US4431960

4935708 - High energy pulse forming generator

https://www.google.com/patents/US4935708


Keep experimenting.