The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[gravityblock]

Please note, the 1.094 in my previous calculation has no units and is a dimensionless number since it is based on a ratio.  The dimensionless number of 1.094 is also based on a ratio between the speed of light in a vacuum and the speed of sound in the nuclear structure of the atom. Velocity may be expressed in units of megahertz-meters. This dimensional frequency expresses a relationship between the size and frequency of the transitional quantum state. Expressing velocity in units of megahertz-meters is useful in describing the transitional state of non-centric systems.  So, in essence, TK has no legitimate argument with the dimensionless number of 1.094 being used as 1.094 MHz meters or 1,094,000 m/s.

The megahertz-meter relationship describes the process of quantum transition. The quantum transition involves a strong interaction involving all of the natural forces. Strong interactions require strong mediating forces. The strength of the electrical force, the nuclear force, and the gravitational force converge at a displacement equal to n times the classical radius of the electron 2rp.

Gravock

[gravityblock]

LOL.  Other than the established crackpot Miles Mathis there are few who would continue to fight your many times lost battle with reality.

Please provide a scientific rebuttal instead of asserting your opinion.

Gravock

[TinselKoala]

4 * 10035553 seconds = 40,142,212 seconds, and 3.1416 * 10035553 seconds = 31,527,693 seconds

40,142,212 seconds / 31,527,693 seconds = 1.27200906 or 4 / 3.14 = 1.27...

DIMENSIONLESS, since you are taking the ratio of two quantities of SECONDS.

4 - 3.14 = 0.86
1.27200906 * 0.86 = 1.093927791,

Two more DIMENSIONLESS numbers, the ratio and the product of DIMENSIONLESS numbers, not to mention the FALSE PRECISION and the nonsensical subtraction of two ratios.

which is equal to the quantum transitional speed of 1.094 MHz meters or 1,094,000 m/s. 

Where did these "meters per second" units come from? A DIMENSIONLESS number is NOT EQUAL to a velocity or a "MegaHertzMeters" made-up quantity.
YOU FAIL at this step because your UNITS do not compute properly.  "SIX" does not equal "Half a dozen EGGS".  Is six o'clock equal to a six-pack of cola? That is what you are claiming here. DIMENSIONS, aka UNITS, matter and must work out algebraically just as the numbers themselves must. YOU FAIL in this.

The quantum transitional speed is directly tied to the Planck's constant, the fine structure constant, the speed of light, the speed of sound in the nuclear structure of the atom, etc.

I can make up all kinds of numbers too. If the UNITS do not work out, as they do not work out in your pretend calculation above .... they are wrong.

You are playing some pretty silly games with numbers there.

[gravityblock]

DIMENSIONLESS, since you are taking the ratio of two quantities of SECONDS. Two more DIMENSIONLESS numbers, the ratio and the product of DIMENSIONLESS numbers, not to mention the FALSE PRECISION and the nonsensical subtraction of two ratios.Where did these "meters per second" units come from? A DIMENSIONLESS number is NOT EQUAL to a velocity or a "MegaHertzMeters" made-up quantity.
YOU FAIL at this step because your UNITS do not compute properly.  "SIX" does not equal "Half a dozen EGGS".  Is six o'clock equal to a six-pack of cola? That is what you are claiming here. DIMENSIONS, aka UNITS, matter and must work out algebraically just as the numbers themselves must. YOU FAIL in this.
I can make up all kinds of numbers too. If the UNITS do not work out, as they do not work out in your pretend calculation above .... they are wrong.

You are playing some pretty silly games with numbers there.

Please read my previous post.  I already addressed your dimensionless argument prior to you posting, along with the megahertz meter relationship.

Gravock

[TinselKoala]

Please read my previous post.  I already addressed your dimensionless crap prior to you posting this.

Gravock

Dimensionless crap? The DIMENSIONLESS NUMBERS came from your post, didn't they?

Do you now dispute the FACT that units, aka dimensions, MUST work out properly in any calculation? Let's see you give some support for THAT.


Now please show your COMPLETE calculations, as I have done, that also show the units/dimensions working out properly.

But of course  you cannot.