The Holographic Universe and Pi = 4 in Kinematics!

[bugler]

Official physical sciences have become a bad joke.


Black holes, strings theory, dark matter, antimatter, big bang, etc, etc.


Physicists looks now more like loonies than academics.

[gravityblock]

Official physical sciences have become a bad joke.


Black holes, strings theory, dark matter, antimatter, big bang, etc, etc.


Physicists looks now more like loonies than academics.

I agree and I also disagree.  Think about what you are saying!  It sounds like you believe in nothing coming out of science (black holes, string theory, dark matter, antimatter, big bang, etc.)  There is a reason for this, and that is science has nothing to bring forth that is real in this universe, except for one thing.  The one thing that is real in this universe is the one thing they overlook, ignore, dismiss and don't bring forth in their theories, and that is Spirit/Consiousness.   This is because they can't measure or detect this with their instruments.  The centrifugal force is described by physics as being a fictitious force.  The Coriolis force is also described by physics as being a fictitious force.  The Euler force is once again described by physics as being a fictitious force.  Together, these three fictitious forces are necessary for the formulation of correct equations of motion in a rotating reference frame.  Without these three fictitious forces, classical mechanics can't describe motion in a rotating reference frame. 

Which is better, creating fictitious forces in order to properly describe motion in a rotating reference frame, or not creating fictitious forces and not having the correct equations to describe motion in a rotating reference frame?  Black holes, string theory, fictitious forces, virtual photons etc. is necessary in order to describe this false reality.  If the universe wasn't a holographic simulation and was real, then we wouldn't need these fictitious forces and crazy mathematical models to have the correct equations and to properly describe the universe.  Official physical sciences only look like a bad joke to those who believe this universe is real.  The universe is not real and is a holographic simulation, thus the physicists look like loonies in trying to describe this false reality to those who believe it is real.  A holographic universe will unite both religion and science in the near future.  Wait and see!

Gravock 

[bugler]

Read this article. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2672092/Was-Einstein-wrong-Controversial-theory-suggests-speed-light-SLOWER-thought.html


Official physics is just rubbish.


Einstein's work is rubbish and he was the basis for many things like dircarding ether, accepting black holes, etc, etc. All rubbish.


First this so-called science should be rebuilt from scratch by competent scientists (how many do you think there are out there?).
Then we could see what the new theories say about the universe.

[Pirate88179]

Official physics is just rubbish.


Einstein's work is rubbish and he was the basis for many things like dircarding ether, accepting black holes, etc, etc. All rubbish.

Sure, sure.  And you base this upon your great work in physics then?  Easy to say this about one of the greatest minds in recent history, not so easy to prove what you are claiming is true.

Where are your published papers refuting Einstein's work then?  Still working on them?

Bill

[gravityblock]

Read this article. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2672092/Was-Einstein-wrong-Controversial-theory-suggests-speed-light-SLOWER-thought.html


Official physics is just rubbish.


Einstein's work is rubbish and he was the basis for many things like dircarding ether, accepting black holes, etc, etc. All rubbish.


First this so-called science should be rebuilt from scratch by competent scientists (how many do you think there are out there?).
Then we could see what the new theories say about the universe.

Bugler,

You do realize the article you referenced refers to quantum mechanics, positrons (antimatter), and virtual particles which you do not subscribe to as shown in the highlighted portion of the snapshot below!  This is proof that your belief system, your opinions, and your thought process is rubbish in and of itself by being inconsistent and contradictory.  After saying this, I do agree with the article, and the article confirms the work of Ionnais Xydous, Frank Wilczek (nobel prize winner), and Frank Znidarsic.  The article shows how mainstream science doesn't have all of the pieces yet.  According to Xydous, there is a reduction in the E/M wave's velocity when it enters into an Electrostatic Field.  When the photon leaves the Electrostatic Field it can travel at normal constant speed equal to c in a vacuum, but with decreased momentum which corresponds to the decrement of its frequency. This is in agreement with Wilczek's claim of photons being slowed-down inside a superconductor, and is also in agreement with Znidarsic's work in how the speed of light is slowed down in the electronic structure of the atom to match the speed of mechanical waves in the nucleus, which is 1,094,000 m/s.

Also, according to Xydous, the Cold Dark matter is nothing else than the Aether itself with linear velocity of 348,422.9 m/s, which is about 861 times less than the speed of light or equal to 1000 times the sound velocity in air.

Gravock