1939 Gravity Power - multiply power by 1200%

[ARMCORTEX]

No, there has been enough direction.

Simply a matter of planning well and anticipate modification and way to adapt mechanism to test many situation.

To see really if there is OU or not.

Now it is the realm of big boys to decide is its worth the risk, so I ask if the Skinner cultists will pool together or continue the non OU builds individually.

[d3x0r]

This isn't entirely skinner, and may appear to be entirely off topic, but in my considerations I see one leading to the other a little


Ermola Andrei ... unfortunately he's ukrainian so there's some language issues...
http://www.overunity.com/14746/ermola-andrei/msg408658/#new  (summary thread I started)



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0g0FcY-7Fw0 (inventor himself demonstrating.  Just a vertical force ends up causing a perpetual rotation)





I somehow think these two ideas are linked, in that if I had something like TheJohnDevice(.com) (modern, simpler idea section) that if I attached the rotation of the shaft to a slip-ring at the top that had a spring that pulled the rotating axis offset, that it could be self-running... somehow there is probably an equilibrium that will end up with the weight just bound to a higher point instead of allowing it to fall continuously...


Actually got linked to skinner and john's device from recent posts on realstraanik thread about ermola andrei... so that might be part of my bias of linking them.


Translated page of Ermola describing the principle

[ARMCORTEX]

I like Skinner more than that thing. And I like Dimitriev more than Skinner. Bigger smoother more durable=better.

It has super annoying durability issues that he is trying to diminish.

[d3x0r]

I like Skinner more than that thing. And I like Dimitriev more than Skinner. Bigger smoother more durable=better.

It has super annoying durability issues that he is trying to diminish.

Dimitreiv is that big wheel in france right?  Problem with that is size to power ratio.... I tried a sim of that too... and maybe adding more arms will work.... just hard to do in a square grid.


The perpetual motion device noone disputes is that ball on a track in a circle with a pendulum...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9GucVwc36Q (Finsrud GMD)
http://youtu.be/Yqk283c5zBo?t=2m11s

I'll stop straying from topic.  (although this is less of a reach than Ermola)

[ARMCORTEX]

Somebody named matze simmed it well.

All these devices give 4x OU.

So I see that ermola actually is making good papers, this is goood.

You can take design with grain of salt, whats important it overall principle.