Overunity electrolysis - 31 times more effective gas production than with DC

[ramset]

Bob Boyce

[profitis]

Thanks ramset.it seems these methods of current control definitely increase efficiency of gaseous liberation by cleansweeping (removal) of adsorbed species buildup on surface of electrodes drasticly reducing KINETIC and CONCENTRATION OVERPOTENTIAL.I'm not sure if it goes into overunity territory though somebody is going to have to do very careful measurements,rigorous scientific calculation.I won't be surprised if it crosses second law thermodynamics limitations.

[Les Banki]

Thanks ramset.it seems these methods of current control definitely increase efficiency of gaseous liberation by cleansweeping (removal) of adsorbed species buildup on surface of electrodes drasticly reducing KINETIC and CONCENTRATION OVERPOTENTIAL.I'm not sure if it goes into overunity territory though somebody is going to have to do very careful measurements,rigorous scientific calculation.I won't be surprised if it crosses second law thermodynamics limitations.

profitis,

With all due respect, what the hell are you talking about??
Did you actually READ the two articles the discussion on this thread is based on?

And all this ABSURD nonsense about "overunity" here!

It is about time that someone (in this case, me) tells you all that running engines on water ONLY has ALWAYS been WAY "overunity",
as it is, without the need for "very careful measurements, rigorous scientific calculation" as you put it!
You don't believe it?
Fine.
Then you better explain HOW and WHY an ICE, with its 26% efficiency, runs beautifully, all day long on nothing but HydrOxy,
generated by  no 'fancy' circuit but quite ordinary electrolysis (but done CORRECTLY)!

The trouble is that most of you have fallen for all the BS "scientific" explanations for WHY this can't be done!
Try to tell that to all those around the world who have done it for several decades already.
Or to the man I have personally known for 20 years who has been running his first "water car" since 1979 and the
second one (a large van) since 1998, with the "government's" blessing, may I add!

Guys, it is time to cut the BULLSHIT!
You have all been had BIG time!
TRY to snap out of it!

THIS thread is about a new electrolysis method which can achieve 8 times 'Faraday' gas production!
Guys, you want FREE ENERGY, right?
Well, WAKE UP and pay attention!

STOP arguing and theorizing!
Get your hands dirty instead and you might get your FREE ENERGY!

Cheers,
Les Banki

[Kator01]

Hello Mr. Les Banki,


profitis - I guess - is takling about the Helmholz double-layer builiding up on the electrode-surface. This build-up happens within 3 mykosec which is the reason that the method discussed here becomes efficient - although I am not convinced that pulses below 3mykosec puls-width are the only reason. Znidarsic´s work on quantum transition might give a better answer.

Mr. Les Banki  please bear with me - and profitis - in divigating the subject but Znidarsic´s work is of some importance in regard to this topic. He is an electrical engineer and not a theoreticianYou may accept the following Link or skip it. It is for those who want to learn some extraordinary idea which has proven true in Podlenkovs work and in cold-fusion.
We are talking here about the physical dimension of a cell adapted to the quantum-transition constant:

Quote:

" The Z Theory is simple and intuitive once the basic physics and engineering concepts are explained, thanks to enthusiastic fellow physicist Lane Davis [12], who has created an excellent series of more than 20 videos posted on YouTube [13]. Davis takes you from high school electromagnetism and practical everyday engineering through highly controversial cold fusion and anti-gravity research to the elementary algebra that encapsulates the Z theory, proving how all the fundamental constants are reduced to just one, the velocity of sound in the atomic nucleus of about 1 million metres per second, 1.093846 x 10⁶ m/s, to be more precise [12]. Interview
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6JiiQ22YC7Y

Now this velocity 1.093846 x 10⁶ m/s can be expressed in Hzm ( 1/s m ) which gives us a tool to choose the correct frequency adapted to the physical dimension ( length ) of a coaxial cell.

We are dealing here with harmonics of these pulses and in this setup they might have come close to the quantum-transition speed found by Mr. Znidarsic.

Its worth a try - at least I will test it.

Nevertheless looking forward to your suggestions for practical work..the real deal.

Regards

Kator01

[ramset]

Les
You have OUR undivided attention!
Kator
I attached a patent  which touches your topic and was  recently  translated By Peterae and itsu At OUR [over unity research]
.


Thx
Chet