Oscillating sine wave LC tank magnet motor.

[synchro1]

12V~40V 10A Pulse Width Modulation PWM DC Motor Speed Control Switch.

This D.C. motor controller costs $9.92. This beats an A.C. frequency driver in cost by a long shot.

Two of these alternators driven by the D.C. motor, and speed controller from a twelve volt battery could power appliances; and act as a powerful emergency back up power plant in case of outage.

[synchro1]

It's worth having a look at Gerard Morin's how to video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaSvtjoAMk

Morin's drain motor diametric tube magnet is the same as the one JLN used in his "Lenz Delay" video. The difference is JLN had a large ferrite core to slide the output coil back and forth on to achieve "Lenz Delay". There's no way Morin can achieve "Lenz Propulsion" without the adjustable core and without a D.C. motor that can turn at tens of thousands of rpm's for high air core CMF. He maintains the drain alternator runs with less resistance as he speeds it up. Pretty non-specific.

The other thing is he's running his D.C. motor with only an on off switch. A low slot platform compared to the turntable alternator and high speed D.C. speed control version we have under examination. The turntable stators function as JLN's ferrite core for "Lenz Delay". 

[synchro1]

I watched all of Morin's videos and most of his replicators videos, and the D.C. motor always draws more amps every time the tester connects the alternator load. Never once have I seen the drain motor alternator show any signs of "Lenz Delay". The coils are fixed in position around the steel core. The core would have to allow the coils to move to control the delay of the "Reflected Magnet Wave".

Morin's approach of adding magnets to the sides of the D.C. motor is proven to help lower input and raise output. Combining this advantage with a "Lenz Reversal Effect" in the alternator might help it go over the top. A turntable alternator can transform it's A.C. voltage to 65,000 through an Ozone transformer just as easily as the drain job. The real dividends come from controlling the alternator drag, something the turntable stator model should be able to do better. The microwave turntable motor has a six or eight pole rotor. This yields a minimum of a 3 to 1 R.P.M. ratio, so if CMF were 12K in the diametric drain job, the turntable rotor could do it at 4K.

The drain motor alternator has a CMF, but it's way to high a spin rate for safety. The synchronous washtub motor has a running speed of 3000 rpm, while the turntable motor only 600. It's traveling five times as fast for the same 60 hertz frequency! That makes washtub CMF five times the turntable R.P.M. right off the bat.

The combination of the D.C. motor "Booster Magnets" and the "Lenz Reversed" alternator" has high self loop potential.

[synchro1]

Compare the over sized two pole rotor above Morin has to spin five times as fast as the tiny six pole below. That's at least twenty five times the work! Five times the mass at five times the speed makes it pretty hard to achieve CMF with the D.C. motor Morin's powering his alternator with.

[synchro1]

George Chaniotakis runs a synchronous motor with a second core in parallel acting as an electro magnet and achieves awesome input reduction:

Amazing High Efficiency Motor:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FVeOF53i8-E