Gyroscopic Inertia Generator

[tinman]

k
11/20/14

What if? . . .

What if I were to state that I do not intend to perform any extensive testing beyond this humble attempt to confirm that internal system voltage may rise while system is operating and possibly powering an LED light while maintaining or increasing voltage?

What if I were to state this is all I care about?

If there is ANY evidence this might be accomplished then; all you experts are certainly welcome to perform all this proposed testing to determine specific performance.
And, of course and if they need a machine to test, I would certainly be willing to rent my asset to them for the purposes of testing. 

While I, on the other hand, will then pursue bigger and better things while all you eggheads can do ALL the work to solve whatever problem(s) you might decide to have with the revealed evidence.... 

See how that might work?
If I were to make an actual claim of a specific performance then; everybody will certainly demand  that I perform all this work and prove it beyond my own believe system.
This would be a huge burden of proof thrust upon me by way of my own claim...
And if system actually is operating within the variable source energy fields and charging batteries that are subject to various conditions including temperature and even plate forming that occurs over time, and system performance changes merely depending on location, orientation, time of day, solar system cycles and other factors; how does one possibly quantify this and provide any specific performance results?

So why would I, Mike, John, Aaron, Peter (or anybody else for that matter) make any such claims subject to such demands and burdens?!?

It would appear that if anybody makes a specific claim then others, such as yourself, will certainly demand proof.
In this hypothetical, "what if?", scenerio; the proof would already be there for those with open minds to learn, ears to hear and eyes to see.
BUT they have to actually see, touch, and hear it in order to obtain the true knowledge they seek!

Otherwise; they lazily claim "you faked the video"... 
So. . . why would we want to subject ourselves to such attacks?!?

Would it be acceptable if I merely attempt to replicate what was presented in the video to the satisfaction of myself while also sharing my experience here for all to see?
Would it be acceptable if I merely allow others to find the proof they seek to support their own belief systems?

Want true, first hand, experiential knowledge and undeniable proof?
Then build and/or and test it yourself silly!   

}:>

John, Arron, Peter have made many claims to self running free energy machines, but never once backed up said claims with hard evidence-nothing out of the ordinary there.
Be true to your self Scorch-search for the truth through testing.

Remember, John, Arron, Peter are all for making money, and the longer they hide the truth, the more money they make.

[TinselKoala]

What if I were to state that I do not intend to perform any extensive testing beyond this humble attempt to confirm that internal system voltage may rise while system is operating and possibly powering an LED light while maintaining or increasing voltage?

What if I were to state this is all I care about?

If that's all you care about you can do it for under 5 dollars, with no moving parts.

Skip ahead to 11:00 and watch from there, for a demonstration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQi4jz2puio

[Scorch]

Is this is a logical assumption these men are only motivated by greed?
Do we actually know what motivates these other individual men such as that beyond mere greed?
Are they actually receiving substantial income from this or do most of them still maintain a 'day job'?

If there is so much money to be made in this field of providing educational materials and experimental kits for a specific consideration-compensation; then why aren't there a lot more than just few men doing this?

If a man wants to be 'in it for the money'; is this a logical choice for a man to choose such a controversial field in which 'proof positive' is not always forthcoming and history has proven that those who try are always subject to a LOT of personal ridicule, attacks, legal challenges and even death?
And if one does, in fact, provide hard evidence the second law needs a serious revision, does mainstream science and other factors such as the energy and banking cabals merely roll over, play dead, follow their lead and immediately revise the second law?  Which ALREADY faces something like 12 known challenges and, yet, remains unrevised despite revisions to many other laws.......

Do good teachers, such as a college professor, merely provide hard evidence to 'back his claim' or does he actually encourage and challenge his students to construct and perform the experiments for themselves so they may gain their own experiential KNOWLEDGE?
Has anybody ever bothered to replicate the original single battery "school girl" device that won the science fair?
(I suspect they have but haven't seen one. So I will probably have to build it myself based on the new information I just received.)

I see no evidence or record that John, Arron or Peter are perpetrating a "hide the truth" fraud or they are in this ONLY for the receiving of compensation for their time, services, or goods or that anybody expecting or receiving compensation for their time, services, or goods is actually a 'bad thing' and I believe no such evidence or record exists. 

Is there anything to "remember" beyond these mere assumptions, presumptions, or opinions regarding what might be the motives of other men?

In consideration of ALL the ridicule and personal attacks already revealed here in these OU forums; would it be logical for me to make any "earth shattering" claims about the specific performance of this experiment?

Does this serve as even more evidence to WHY these and many other men (such as Ed Leedskalnin) may be VERY reluctant to reveal their truth in this context of said ridicule, personal attacks, highly competitive attitudes and seriously destructive wars?

Kindest regards;

}:>

John, Arron, Peter have made many claims to self running free energy machines, but never once backed up said claims with hard evidence-nothing out of the ordinary there.
Be true to your self Scorch-search for the truth through testing.

Remember, John, Arron, Peter are all for making money, and the longer they hide the truth, the more money they make.

[Scorch]

Thank you for the information, I have watched the video in it's entirety and is very interesting, but appears to be out of context. Or, otherwise, not quite what I might care about in terms of usefulness and the fact this experiment is not even in the same class, requires a powered transmitter, and appears to only be a demonstration of the wireless transmission of energy that is NOT demonstrating how much potential is consumed by transmitter versus how much potential back out from the receiver or anything beyond typical characteristics of electrolytic recovery which is similar to that of a battery electrolyte that also recovers some voltage after load removed. Nothing new here. . . . 

Please show me a joule thief that does not require a powered transmitter and is charging my 12 volt car battery... then I might care about that! 

For clarification regarding said hypothetical "what if" scenario; this scenario is in regards to a system that appears to be operating in an electrical-mechanical resonance providing well over 13 volts to power a bank of sixty LEDs or charge a common 12 volt battery or a bank of nine 350 farad ultra capacitors.

The video of the $5 experiment, producing 1-2 volts, does not appear to be anywhere near the useful 13+ volt lighting-charging output I might care about and is not an electro-mechanical system also providing a rotational 'shaft output'.

Please forgive me; but I do love mechanical, spinning, devices operating within, or even in conjunction with, this solar system and my Mother earth. 
But, of course, if there is a solid state device producing more useful output, such as a 'giant' joule thief that doesn't require a transmitter, then I might care about that as well. 

Kindest regards;

}:>

If that's all you care about you can do it for under 5 dollars, with no moving parts.

Skip ahead to 11:00 and watch from there, for a demonstration.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQi4jz2puio

[synchro1]

Tinsel(Mythbuster)Koala apparently found the hamster in Mike Kantz's motor alternator!