Overunity.com Archives is Temporarily on Read Mode Only!



Free Energy will change the World - Free Energy will stop Climate Change - Free Energy will give us hope
and we will not surrender until free energy will be enabled all over the world, to power planes, cars, ships and trains.
Free energy will help the poor to become independent of needing expensive fuels.
So all in all Free energy will bring far more peace to the world than any other invention has already brought to the world.
Those beautiful words were written by Stefan Hartmann/Owner/Admin at overunity.com
Unfortunately now, Stefan Hartmann is very ill and He needs our help
Stefan wanted that I have all these massive data to get it back online
even being as ill as Stefan is, he transferred all databases and folders
that without his help, this Forum Archives would have never been published here
so, please, as the Webmaster and Creator of these Archives, I am asking that you help him
by making a donation on the Paypal Button above.
You can visit us or register at my main site at:
Overunity Machines Forum



ZERO INPUT, 10 degrees thermal output...Yes,...genuine free energy

Started by TheoriaApophasis, December 22, 2014, 05:54:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on December 26, 2014, 06:56:33 PM

I see your study of IAAD is nill and zero   


(instantaneous action at a distance).

likewise GYROMAGNETIC PRECESSION is a very WELL KNOWN ENTITY


any MRI technician knows about it.



As I said, there are TONS of examples.

I have seen no evidence demonstrating any detectable motion of the magnetic field surrounding a "stationary" permanent magnet, and, again, your examples present none.

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on December 26, 2014, 06:58:23 PM
I have seen no evidence demonstrating any detectable motion of the magnetic field surrounding a "stationary" permanent magnet, and, again, your examples present none.


then youre blind, clueless, and dumb to boot. 


GYROMAGNETIC PRECESSION is a very WELL KNOWN ENTITY


also known as the larmor frequency,    (hint hint hint  FREQUENCY = MOVEMENT)




Go research, or dont, ..........I dont give a damn.

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on December 26, 2014, 07:09:38 PM

then youre blind, clueless, and dumb to boot. 


GYROMAGNETIC PRECESSION is a very WELL KNOWN ENTITY


also known as the larmor frequency,    (hint hint hint  FREQUENCY = MOVEMENT)




Go research, or dont, ..........I dont give a damn.

At the risk of derailing this thread, the response of a proton to an externally applied (and modulated) magnetic field as is done in an MRI machine does not in any way provide evidence of motion of the magnetic field surrounding a stationary permanent magnet.

So once again, I have seen no evidence demonstrating any detectable motion of the magnetic field surrounding a "stationary" permanent magnet, and your examples present none. 

TheoriaApophasis

Quote from: picowatt on December 26, 2014, 07:17:25 PM
externally applied (and modulated) magnetic field


OK, proven dumb then.


gyromagnetic precession is present in any magnetic system, be it atomic or magnet,    FORGET about MRI.



Likewise the phase shift is proven via the ferrocell, likewise POLARITY PHASE SHIFT is a known entity with biased rarefaction on the N pole.



Youre daft, but no shocker.

picowatt

Quote from: TheoriaApophasis on December 26, 2014, 07:34:26 PM

OK, proven dumb then.


gyromagnetic precession is present in any magnetic system, be it atomic or magnet,    FORGET about MRI.



Likewise the phase shift is proven via the ferrocell, likewise POLARITY PHASE SHIFT is a known entity with biased rarefaction on the N pole.



Youre daft, but no shocker.

The stationary patterns produced with your Ferrocell and a PM provide no evidence of motion of the magnetic field surrounding a stationary permanent magnet.

So once again, I have seen no evidence demonstrating any detectable motion of the magnetic field surrounding a "stationary" permanent magnet, and your examples continue to present none.